Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
- From: "Malcolm McLean" <regniztar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 23:53:44 -0000
"Richard" <rgrdev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
Its a case by case thing and there are no hard and fast rules. SometimesDocument each and every data state? Wouldn't it be easier just to say that the code documents each and every possible state of the algorithm?
it is impractical to rewrite since there is no suitable design
documents from the original documenting each and every data state and
which ones are important to keep in order to correctly process the
legacy data.
The snags with a lot of formal methods are mind-crashingly simple. Instead of wrting correct code first time, we write a correct design first time, and then get a low skilled person to code it up.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
- From: Richard
- Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
- References:
- Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
- From: Flash Gordon
- Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
- From: Richard
- Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
- From: Richard
- Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
- Prev by Date: Re: how can we check to not enter the any string or char?
- Next by Date: Assigning values to char arrays
- Previous by thread: Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
- Next by thread: Re: A Trend Towards Lower Software Maintenance Budgets?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|