Re: Multi precision floating point
- From: Ian Collins <ian-news@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 11:51:40 +1300
Flash Gordon wrote:
jacob navia wrote, On 30/11/07 21:32:
Keith Thompson wrote:
jacob navia <jacob@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
<snip>
3) Using operator overloading, I integrated this library
like a basic type into the language.
Where the phrase "the language" refers to something other than C.
No. All this extensions are compatible with the C standard as
I have explained thousand times in this newsgroup.
Note that the C standard does NOT forbid extensions
Well, your compiler does not conform to the C standard *without* the
-ansic flag (for example declaring atof in math.h), so does it support
operator overloading *with* the -ansic flag? If not then it compiles C
when the -ansic flag is specified and something other than C that
supports operator overloading with it.
Just like gcc?
--
Ian Collins.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multi precision floating point
- From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: Multi precision floating point
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Multi precision floating point
- From: Flash Gordon
- Re: Multi precision floating point
- References:
- Re: Multi precision floating point
- From: Flash Gordon
- Re: Multi precision floating point
- Prev by Date: Re: Very interesting GC discussion
- Next by Date: Re: Reading a table
- Previous by thread: Re: Multi precision floating point
- Next by thread: Re: Multi precision floating point
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|