Re: As a programmer of both languages...
- From: Ian Collins <ian-news@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:49:37 +1300
jacob navia wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:Your ignorance continues to astound. Maybe you should take some time
jacob navia wrote:You can't program in C++ without using classes. Even if you define
The difference between C and C++ is the object orientation of C++. C isAre you really dense, or just being obtuse? As you have been told many
not object oriented.
times before, C++ is a multi paradigm language. You can *choose* to
write OO or procedural code in C++.
a simple structure it is actually a class.
out and learn C++ before slagging it off.
C++ does nothing magical with structs, if a struct is valid C, it is
equally valid in C++, nothing is added. Otherwise how could we use C
libraries with C++?
Of course you can write a hello world program without them but explainBy not using them?
me how do you ignore classes in C++?
If everything C does plus quite a bit more (like your beloved operator
Maybe, who knows what buzzword will be invented in the future, but
the fact is that without classes you just can't do anything at all in
C++.
overloading) amounts to nothing.....
Or... I am just "dense" and fail to grasp the obvious :-)Probably.
--
Ian Collins.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: As a programmer of both languages...
- From: jacob navia
- Re: As a programmer of both languages...
- References:
- As a programmer of both languages...
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Re: As a programmer of both languages...
- From: jacob navia
- Re: As a programmer of both languages...
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: As a programmer of both languages...
- From: jacob navia
- As a programmer of both languages...
- Prev by Date: Re: *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption
- Next by Date: Re: operators and type promotion
- Previous by thread: Re: As a programmer of both languages...
- Next by thread: Re: As a programmer of both languages...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|