Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- From: Mark Bluemel <mark_bluemel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:37:35 +0000
rembremading wrote:
Yes, your assembler code works fine, although I don't understand what it
does :-)
Then read http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/gccintro/gccintro_70.html
It answers your questions fairly comprehensively and gives a simple
way of disabling extended precision for the duration of a program's
execution.
The mechanism outlined is the simplest way of "fixing" your problem.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- From: Chris Torek
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- References:
- Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- From: rembremading
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- From: rembremading
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- From: rembremading
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- From: rembremading
- Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- Prev by Date: Re: typedef function with void parameters
- Next by Date: Re: typedef function with void parameters
- Previous by thread: Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- Next by thread: Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion
- Index(es):