Re: Positive random number
- From: Tor Rustad <tor_rustad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 17:50:16 +0100
Johannes Bauer wrote:
[...]
Then again - in a trueley mathematic sense - almost all mathematicians
consider zero to be nonpositive. Almost all of them agree that zero is a
positive number, too. This is because "almost" in a mathematic sense
means "except for a finite number of exceptions" :-)
#define is_zero_positive 0
T wrapper_positive(T number)
{
return is_zero_positive ? number : number + 1;
}
<gd&r>
--
Tor <bwzcab@xxxxxxxxx | tr i-za-h a-z>
.
- References:
- Positive random number
- From: deepak
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Jack Klein
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Johannes Bauer
- Re: Positive random number
- From: pete
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Spoon
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Johannes Bauer
- Re: Positive random number
- From: James Kuyper
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Johannes Bauer
- Positive random number
- Prev by Date: Re: Print a signel octal
- Next by Date: Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program
- Previous by thread: Re: Positive random number
- Next by thread: Re: Positive random number
- Index(es):