Re: Positive random number
- From: santosh <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:48:57 +0530
Johannes Bauer wrote:
<snip discussion about whether zero should be considered
positive or not>
The status of zero in mathematics seems to be similar to that of the
photon in physics. The "correct" definition in a particular case is the
definition that yields good results!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Positive random number
- References:
- Positive random number
- From: deepak
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Jack Klein
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Johannes Bauer
- Re: Positive random number
- From: pete
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Spoon
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Johannes Bauer
- Re: Positive random number
- From: James Kuyper
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Johannes Bauer
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Philip Potter
- Re: Positive random number
- From: Johannes Bauer
- Positive random number
- Prev by Date: Re: Annoying compiler warning
- Next by Date: Re: main
- Previous by thread: Re: Positive random number
- Next by thread: Re: Positive random number
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|