Re: Redirect stdin ?

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:24:22 -0800, William Pursell wrote:
If you are okay with using gcc extensions, here's a section from the
glibc info pages you might find interesting:

<OT> gcc is not glibc, and glibc is not gcc. If it's documented in the
glibc info pages, you can assume it's a glibc extension rather than a gcc
one. Except for those that have been part of POSIX or similar standards
for a while, glibc extensions are less portable / more unportable than
gcc extensions. </OT>
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: math.nroot [was Re: A brief question.]
    ... >> happy to use gcc, they all could have used the older gcc spellings ... parings of C compilers and C runtime libraries are ... use glibc, they all could have used the older glibc spellings. ... trap doesn't actually fire until the _next_ fp operation ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: recommendation for toolchain
    ... What toolchain can you recommend to me? ... Building a cross-GCC for Linux shouldn't be any harder than building ... When producing GCC one needs premade binutils and a premade C ... So if you can find an existing premade glibc for the ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)
  • Re: Recommended compiler version and NPTL
    ... There is one more place except the r8169 driver where gcc 2.95.3 is bad. ... Check out a known good glibc from CVS: ... If you get a failure, make a note of it and reissue the "make ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Sources for functions like malloc()
    ... Thanks for correcting me, Dan. ... >>standard library sources, as you said. ... >>and GCC don't have anything to do with each other, ... Many parts of glibc look like complete gibberish to the ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: memory required to emerge glibc and gcc?
    ... > How much memory is required to compile glibc and gcc? ... > I was comparing 2 machines to look at runtimes to emerge glibc and gcc on ... > even be slower to emerge gcc. ...
    (comp.os.linux.hardware)