Re: xmalloc string functions
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:20:21 -0500
Randy Howard wrote:
.... snip ...
What this amounts to is one of those so-called "religious"
disputes about which programmers love to argue, yet nobody every
gets "converted". In a word, pointless. Well, there is an
outside chance that somebody that hasn't formed an opinion yet
might learn something from the debate that would help them come
to a conclusion. However, calling each other "idiot", or "smart
arses" doesn't do much to help that process along.
Well, that depends on your definition of 'that process'. If it is
'an efficient method of engendering flamewars', I think it has been
admirably assisted.
--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- References:
- xmalloc string functions
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: xmalloc string functions
- From: Yevgen Muntyan
- Re: xmalloc string functions
- From: Kelsey Bjarnason
- Re: xmalloc string functions
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: xmalloc string functions
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: xmalloc string functions
- From: Yevgen Muntyan
- Re: xmalloc string functions
- From: Randy Howard
- Re: xmalloc string functions
- From: Yevgen Muntyan
- Re: xmalloc string functions
- From: Randy Howard
- xmalloc string functions
- Prev by Date: Re: xmalloc string functions
- Next by Date: time in threaded programs
- Previous by thread: Re: xmalloc string functions
- Next by thread: Re: xmalloc string functions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|