Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem
- From: Morris Dovey <mrdovey@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:47:30 -0500
Kelsey Bjarnason wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:31:05 +0000, Herbert Rosenau wrote:
In practise it does not - because immediately after free() has oned its
work the sheduler gives another thread the CPU and that thread has
nothing better to do than to eat the released memory for its own job.
Scheduler or no, it seems to me than an implementation which does this
may in fact be non-conforming.
Eh? Please give a few hints as to your thought process here. I'm
not following (finding) your logic...
--
Morris Dovey
DeSoto Solar
DeSoto, Iowa USA
http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem
- From: Kelsey Bjarnason
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem
- References:
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem
- From: Kelsey Bjarnason
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem
- From: Herbert Rosenau
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem
- From: Kelsey Bjarnason
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem
- Prev by Date: Re: "sorting the news"
- Next by Date: hi, can anyone tell me if this software can be done in C?
- Previous by thread: Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem
- Next by thread: Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|