Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:58:01 -0500
Keith Thompson wrote:
"Gerry Ford" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:.... snip ...
This, of course, differs with persons who miss with such sincerity.
Is this supposed to be word salad? (Consult Google if you don't
know what "word salad" means.)
If you don't start making sense soon, you can expect to be ignored.
For unknown reasons 'Ford's posts never get here. I suspect he is
intercepted by some newsserver along the path to me. I am NOT
complaining.
--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?
- From: Tony Giles
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?
- References:
- Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?
- From: lak
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?
- From: Gerry Ford
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?
- From: Gerry Ford
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?
- From: Keith Thompson
- Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?
- Prev by Date: Re: incr MACRO
- Next by Date: Re: incr MACRO
- Previous by thread: Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?
- Next by thread: Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|