Re: dual core and c
- From: gazelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kenny McCormack)
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:58:55 +0000 (UTC)
In article <slrnfsgao5.qqc.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Antoninus Twink <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
....
But what I don't understand is the concept of a "core", as in "dual
core". What implications does that have for a C program like zip?
Does it have the ability to look at the instructions ahead of time
and pipeline them or something? Pipelining is something that has
been around for a long time. Did someone just get the bright idea to
call it dual core instead or what?
And HeathField's attack dogs are unleashed in 3... 2... 1...
Yes. I was quite amazed to see that Roberson managed to post a response
in this thread - that wasn't the usual:
Off topic. Not portable. Cant discuss it here. Blah, blah, blah.
nonsense. He must be slipping. Clique membership possibly in doubt.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dual core and c
- From: Nelu
- Re: dual core and c
- References:
- dual core and c
- From: kerravon
- Re: dual core and c
- From: Antoninus Twink
- dual core and c
- Prev by Date: Re: dual core and c
- Next by Date: Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately
- Previous by thread: Re: dual core and c
- Next by thread: Re: dual core and c
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|