Re: dual core and c
- From: Nelu <spamahead@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Feb 2008 16:48:43 GMT
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:58:55 +0000, Kenny McCormack wrote:
In article <slrnfsgao5.qqc.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Antoninus Twink<snip>
<nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ...
And HeathField's attack dogs are unleashed in 3... 2... 1...Yes. I was quite amazed to see that Roberson managed to post a response
in this thread - that wasn't the usual:
Off topic. Not portable. Cant discuss it here. Blah, blah, blah.
nonsense. He must be slipping. Clique membership possibly in doubt.
I was expecting to see you all grown up, maybe posting something useful
and on topic every once in a while... Oh well, I see that, at least, you
have a friend to talk to.
--
Ioan - Ciprian Tandau
tandau _at_ freeshell _dot_ org (hope it's not too late)
(... and that it still works...)
.
- References:
- dual core and c
- From: kerravon
- Re: dual core and c
- From: Antoninus Twink
- Re: dual core and c
- From: Kenny McCormack
- dual core and c
- Prev by Date: Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- Next by Date: Re: array index and pointer, which is faster?
- Previous by thread: Re: dual core and c
- Next by thread: Re: dual core and c
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|