Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: jacob navia <jacob@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 20:58:25 +0100
Kaz Kylheku wrote:
In principle, blocks can allocate and deallocate individually. That
requires a small overhead, but it would be a smart implementation
strategy for blocks that contain large arrays. Or at least a code-
generation option, if not default behavior.
Care to name a SINGLE compiler system that does this kind of stuff?
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32
.
- References:
- Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: Mahesh
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: Kaz Kylheku
- Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- Next by Date: Re: array index and pointer, which is faster?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|