Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Tobin)
- Date: 29 Feb 2008 21:12:56 GMT
In article <12b8f0bd-7e79-486e-bdbf-b1e92a38ba2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
However, it wouldn't be weird at all if the inlined procedure simply
moves the stack pointer by some delta to enlarge the current frame,
then references all of its locals with respect to the current frame,
and then moves the stack pointer back by the same delta upon
termination to release the storage.
But what would be the point?
-- Richard
--
:wq
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: Morris Dovey
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- References:
- Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: Mahesh
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: Micah Cowan
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- From: Kaz Kylheku
- Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- Prev by Date: Re: calculating length of an substring
- Next by Date: Re: array index and pointer, which is faster?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|