Re: Doubts about pointers

Keith Thompson wrote:
santosh <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

Thanks, but I have access to better systems, and so do most.

Do those better systems allow you to test your code for portability to
16-bit systems?

Well that depends if he has emulators for them. There are a lot of
different 16 bit systems out there.

--
Ian Collins.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Revenge of Dapple!
    ... of an eye on portability than before. ... EMU]['s gotten just so hairy I can't look at the code anymore, so I'm starting from the ground up. ... But it's off to a start, it's got the scanlines method already, because of SDL, and as soon as I can get the keyboard and disk running, then it'll at least stand up to the older emulators. ...
    (comp.emulators.apple2)
  • Re: c compiler?
    ... Keith Thompson a écrit: ... non-standard extensions are disabled? ... it could be a very useful tool for writing portable ... Portability is maybe nice but usability is maybe better. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: preprocessing statements
    ... drop by and pick up a few pearls of what I am pleased to call "wisdom".] ... [snip lots of good stuff] ... Keith Thompson kst-u@xxxxxxx ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: code
    ... Keith Thompson wrote: ... Not by me until I'm more experienced in portability. ... perror is as portable as any other function in the standard library. ... assumption that fopensets errno on an error is not entirely ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: File exist
    ... There is no stat() function in standard C. Using it will limit the ... portability of your code. ... Keith Thompson kst-u@xxxxxxx ...
    (comp.lang.c)