Re: Doubts about pointers
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:30:44 -0500
Nick Keighley wrote:
Simon <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<snip>
Actually I'm mostly learning C from the book by H. Schildt, which is
excellent but it doesn't mention near and far pointers at all. I find
them quite confusing, so I think any book should explain them clearly.
As for being obsolete, the good thing is that Borland have released
Turbo-C for free now, so there's no need to worry about Micro$oft
license fees. Also C doesn't change much!
there are many free compilers for modern systems (no near and far).
If you are confined to Windows then there is a gcc based one (ming-w
(sp?)) lcc (no charge for non-commercial use) and even Microsoft
express versions.
Those are NOT 16 bit systems. They cannot be used to check code
executes correctly on a minimal system.
--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Doubts about pointers
- From: Nick Keighley
- Re: Doubts about pointers
- References:
- Doubts about pointers
- From: Simon
- Re: Doubts about pointers
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Doubts about pointers
- From: Simon
- Re: Doubts about pointers
- From: Nick Keighley
- Doubts about pointers
- Prev by Date: Re: Doubts about pointers
- Next by Date: Re: void * vs. T *
- Previous by thread: Re: Doubts about pointers
- Next by thread: Re: Doubts about pointers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|