Re: The problems in comp.lang.c

CBFalconer wrote:
You are wrong. The answer is extremely simple. I, personally,
like a newsgroup where people are all discussing the same thing. The item that creates that 'same thing' is the C standard, and this
is why we consider anything that ignores it to be off-topic. The
majority here agree with me.

The C standard is rejected by the regulars.

They prefer older versions of it, or even Turboc



--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?
    ... CBFalconer wrote: ... snip ... ... Yes, this newsgroup is c.l.c. ... Standard, but merely with the behaviour that would be produced if ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Backtrace function
    ... CBFalconer said: ... So you appear to agree, now, that the code is standard, non-portable ... Well done - you now agree with Jacob *and* me. ... Google users: ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: C Socket programming question
    ... CBFalconer wrote: ... > non-standard constructs or functions, ... > newsgroup) nor exceed about 65 char. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Multi precision floating point
    ... All this extensions are compatible with the C standard as ... I have explained thousand times in this newsgroup. ... jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Good way of checking if file exists ?
    ... Geiregat Jonas wrote: ... > CBFalconer wrote: ... the subject of this newsgroup. ... > Where could I find information what is Standard ISO C ...
    (comp.lang.c)