Re: The problems in comp.lang.c
- From: gazelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Kenny McCormack)
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:42:58 +0000 (UTC)
In article <slrnfuprtp.r33.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Antoninus Twink <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 28 Mar 2008 at 10:47, Jeff P. Bailey wrote:
In summary, I find your evidence wafer thin. Only one of the examples
shows definite dishonesty on your part, but all of the others show every
sign of being a deliberate attempt on your part to misconstrue what
jacob has said for the purposes of presenting him in a negative light.
Your examples have only confirmed my belief that you have a personal
agenda to undermine him.
Heathfield plays a game in clc of trying to argue absurd points - for
example, that C doesn't have global variables. Sometimes he pushes this
too far - when he tries to claim that he doesn't have a deep-seated
personal vendetta against Jacob, that's really something noone's going
to believe for a second.
Does anybody ever believe anything that lying sack of crap says?
.
- References:
- The problems in comp.lang.c
- From: Jeff P. Bailey
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c
- From: Jeff P. Bailey
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c
- From: Antoninus Twink
- The problems in comp.lang.c
- Prev by Date: Re: case labels
- Next by Date: Re: Enum type check in function call
- Previous by thread: Re: The problems in comp.lang.c
- Next by thread: Re: The problems in comp.lang.c
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|