Re: Doubts about pointers

ymuntyan@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Richard Heathfield <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

.... snip ...

<shrug> You're right - it isn't. It's not far off, but there are
indeed a small number of minor conformance issues. I think the
only one I've ever bumped into in real code is the CLOCKS_PER_SEC
thing, which is hardly a showstopper.

Your "I've ever bumped" here sounds like that's the only
non-conformance issue you are aware of, but it's not. Sadly, it
only confirms that you are advocating Turbo C just because you've
done it and you won't admit you were wrong ("sadly" part if a joke,
yes).

If you object to Richards statement, then you could be helpful and
list the known failures of the compiler. Don't forget to set it
for proper ANSI observance first.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Great SWT Program
    ... good service from the vendor. ... Maybe it's cronyism, for suitable values of "cronyism", though ...
    (comp.lang.java.programmer)
  • Re: Couch Potato
    ... I snip the end that I don't read. ... misleading snippage for whatever reasons. ... Of course people have different meanings for "certainty", ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Set up LiveJournal community?
    ... But <shrug> YMMV. ... I got all that the first time. ... it's serving the purpose of a soap. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: UTC string -> time_t
    ... I just use mktime, which does precisely the same thing as ... Set your system time to GMT. ...
    (comp.lang.c)