Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation
- From: fmassei@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
On 30 Mar, 17:20, Willem <wil...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Richard wrote:
) There are still people like Chuck there spouting nonsense. If you dont
) know, dont answer.
And if you *do* know where correct answers can be found ? Exactly.
If you want to ask about threads, go to comp.programming.threads
Thank you all for the advice, I will write another post there. Anyway,
AFAIK any reentrant function is thread-safe. So, as long as I keep my
library functions reentrant there are no problems. Unfortunately there
are no standard c functions to allocate dynamic memory that are
assured to be reentrant. Is everything correct?
.
- References:
- Reentrant functions and memory allocation
- From: fmassei
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation
- From: Eric Sosman
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation
- From: Richard
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation
- From: Willem
- Reentrant functions and memory allocation
- Prev by Date: Re: Experiences using "register"
- Next by Date: Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation
- Previous by thread: Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation
- Next by thread: Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|