Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4

From: Anand Hariharan <znvygb.nanaq.unevunena@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:11:37 +0200 (CEST)

On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:47:00 +0100, Philip Potter wrote:

Richard wrote:

You dispute that the size needed to store the empty string is 1?

No. I dispute that "the empty string has size = 1", which is a different
statement entirely.

ITYM "I /contend/ that \"the empty string has size = 1\"". Or am I
splitting hairs here?

--
ROT-13 email address to reply
.

References:
- K&R2, exercise 5.4
  - From: arnuld
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4
  - From: arnuld
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4
  - From: arnuld
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4
  - From: arnuld
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4
  - From: Philip Potter
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4
  - From: Richard
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4
  - From: Philip Potter

Prev by Date: Cleaning Up, Mucking Out and Paranoid Programming
Next by Date: producing the memory layout you really want is non-portable and deprecated
Previous by thread: Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4
Next by thread: Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread