Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA
- From: "Default User" <defaultuserbr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Apr 2008 19:10:32 GMT
Richard Harter wrote:
On 11 Apr 2008 15:53:31 GMT, "Default User"
<defaultuserbr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There's no reason for the person to quote the whole message to post
a thanks. He could trim all but a small slice to establish
identity, then correctly post under that.
He could have, but he chose not to, just as you could choose not
to be a bandwidth wasting public nuisance but instead choose to
be one.
You are entitled to your opinion. You could also have, long ago, put in
a filter for the "-TPA" that I so thoughtfully add to the subject line.
*plonk*
Brian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA
- From: Richard
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA
- References:
- Problem with hdparam
- From: Mark Berry
- Re: Problem with hdparam
- From: Antoninus Twink
- Re: Problem with hdparam
- From: Mark Berry
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA
- From: Default User
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA
- From: Default User
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA
- From: Richard Harter
- Problem with hdparam
- Prev by Date: population and industrial?
- Next by Date: Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA
- Next by thread: Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|