Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: santosh <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 13:58:30 +0530
Joachim Schmitz wrote:
Antoninus Twink wrote:
On 30 May 2008 at 21:53, CBFalconer wrote:For some reason that is beound me you elected to ignore CBF's next
Ridiculous. Most use of the function simply runs until a non-zero
is returned, after which the operation ends. It may be because of
EOF, or because of error. In either case, no further input is
available.
If you're in a restaurant and can't get your meal either because
they've run out of salmon or because the kitchen's on fire, you might
find it useful to be able to distinguish between those two error
conditions.
sentence, which addresses exaclty that:
If there is a need to distinguish EOF from errors, it
can be done at that point.
The debate was whether the caller or the callee should disambiguate
between end-of-file and error. IMHO doing it in the caller saves a
small amount of otherwise extra work in the calling code, which is
after all, the main purpose of library code. It's unclear from the
above sentence by CBFalconer whether he means the caller or the callee
when he says "at that point". One might assume from the general tone of
his reply and the use of the word "ridiculous" that he prefers this to
be done by the calling code. Either way is fine but I personally prefer
to have the line reading function do this low-level chore.
In you analogy: just ask the waiter for the reason or listen to the
fire alarm.
The analogy is flawed. The client (line reading function) has to report
the reason to someone else, (perhaps someone at his home). So should
the client ask the waiter for the reason and go home and report that,
or go home and simply say "the salmon was unavailable" and leave it to
that person to go to the restaurant and ask the waiter for the reason
why Salmon was not available?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: Joachim Schmitz
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- References:
- malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: Dave
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: santosh
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: Antoninus Twink
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- From: Joachim Schmitz
- malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- Prev by Date: Re: what is the output of this program?
- Next by Date: Re: calling function in C
- Previous by thread: Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- Next by thread: Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|