Re: private functions

"Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Ronald Bruck wrote:
Sigh. It's been awhile since I've programmed in C, but I'm SURE that
you can have a function whose scope is purely within another function.
You simply can't do this in C.

Nonsense. Of course you can do this in C. Non "standard" extensions are
still "C" I am afraid.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: private functions
    ... Richard wrote: ... you can have a function whose scope is purely within another function. ... Nonsense. ... And if you're afraid, cower. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: private functions
    ... Eric Sosman writes: ... you can have a function whose scope is purely within another function. ... Nonsense. ... And if you're afraid, cower. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: OT: Gone from topic, now on security Re: For PGP Users-Likes and Dislikes of PGP
    ... ActiveX controls written by others are outside of the scope of OE, ... Extensions on Firefox have to be explicitly installed, ... Only this particular issue has been fixed, the general problems of side ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Programming in standard c
    ... The mechanics of this are beyond the scope of the language, for one thing, ... very least a locking mechanism, and perhaps a database instead of a simple ... be useless in _all_ cases. ... If we keep coming back with the same nonsense, why can't you come up with ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: Feedback appreciated for a new design I am working on.
    ... Complete nonsense, I'm afraid. ... I'm afraid you're missing the point. ... If you have provided a content-type of text/html from the server, ...
    (alt.html)