Re: private functions

Eric Sosman <esosman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Richard wrote:
"Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Ronald Bruck wrote:
Sigh. It's been awhile since I've programmed in C, but I'm SURE that
you can have a function whose scope is purely within another function.
You simply can't do this in C.

Nonsense. Of course you can do this in C. Non "standard" extensions are
still "C" I am afraid.

Nonsense. And if you're afraid, cower.

So people using nested functions are not writing C?

Don't be so ridiculous.

Oh, and tell IBM.

http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/lnxpcomp/v8v101/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.xlcpp8l.doc/language/ref/nested_functions.htm
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Feedback appreciated for a new design I am working on.
    ... Complete nonsense, I'm afraid. ... I'm afraid you're missing the point. ... If you have provided a content-type of text/html from the server, ...
    (alt.html)
  • Re: private functions
    ... Richard wrote: ... you can have a function whose scope is purely within another function. ... Nonsense. ... And if you're afraid, cower. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: OT: Another day and another sockpuppet appears from the OBSESSO idiot
    ... if you're not careful scoope they'll be catching a plane to Barcelona to *stalk* you ... are you *afraid*? ... I sneer at who ever indoctrinated you with this nonsense, be it your parents or teachers because they are guilty of child abuse" - Mozzer, 2009. ...
    (uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool)
  • Re: Tiscali strike out application!
    ... >>> I'm afraid you're wasting your time trying to get any sense out of ... >>> nonsense after nonsense. ... > questions tis all. ...
    (uk.local.southwest)
  • Re: private functions
    ... you can have a function whose scope is purely within another function. ... Nonsense. ... Non "standard" extensions are ... still "C" I am afraid. ...
    (comp.lang.c)