Re: function
- From: Richard<rgrdev@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 20:46:54 +0200
"Bill Cunningham" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
"CBFalconer" <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:48417EB4.1B3F9B56@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[snip]
That means while the expression num-- is non-zero, do theconditionals. One of my weak points now. I can barely use while. I have
following. The expression value is num before decrementing it.
for and it down well. Switch is unusable and unreadable to me at this point.
Bill
"while" is about 3x easier to understand than "for". See if you can see why.
.
- References:
- function
- From: Bill Cunningham
- Re: function
- From: Joachim Schmitz
- Re: function
- From: Bill Cunningham
- Re: function
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: function
- From: Bill Cunningham
- function
- Prev by Date: Re: function
- Next by Date: Re: private functions
- Previous by thread: Re: function
- Next by thread: strtok question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|