Re: private functions
- From: Eric Sosman <esosman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 15:35:19 -0400
Richard wrote:
Eric Sosman <esosman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Richard wrote:"Joachim Schmitz" <nospam.jojo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:Nonsense. And if you're afraid, cower.
Ronald Bruck wrote:Nonsense. Of course you can do this in C. Non "standard" extensions areSigh. It's been awhile since I've programmed in C, but I'm SURE thatYou simply can't do this in C.
you can have a function whose scope is purely within another function.
still "C" I am afraid.
So people using nested functions are not writing C?
No, no more than those who write `GOTO 10' are writing C.
Don't be so ridiculous.
Don't be daft.
Oh, and tell IBM.
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/lnxpcomp/v8v101/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.xlcpp8l.doc/language/ref/nested_functions.htm
Quoting from the above: "The language feature is an
extension to C89 and C99, implemented to facilitate porting
programs developed with GNU C."
--
Eric Sosman
esosman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: private functions
- From: Richard
- Re: private functions
- References:
- private functions
- From: Ronald Bruck
- Re: private functions
- From: Joachim Schmitz
- Re: private functions
- From: Richard
- Re: private functions
- From: Eric Sosman
- Re: private functions
- From: Richard
- private functions
- Prev by Date: Re: struct padding ???
- Next by Date: Re: private functions
- Previous by thread: Re: private functions
- Next by thread: Re: private functions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|