Re: is order urgent doubt
- From: lawrence.jones@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 20:02:52 -0400
Eric Sosman <Eric.Sosman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
By concentrating too closely on the "set" notion you may have
been misled into thinking that `double double trouble;' is
a legitimate declaration of what's normally called a `double',
but it's not.
In fact, there are compilers that implement a double double type as an
extension. (As the name implies, it's a floating point type consisting
of a pair of doubles, which allows some strange and wonderful split-
precision operations.)
-- Larry Jones
I don't think that question was very hypothetical at all. -- Calvin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: is order urgent doubt
- From: Eric Sosman
- Re: is order urgent doubt
- References:
- is order urgent doubt
- From: new to c
- Re: is order urgent doubt
- From: jacob navia
- Re: is order urgent doubt
- From: Flash Gordon
- Re: is order urgent doubt
- From: jacob navia
- Re: is order urgent doubt
- From: Walter Roberson
- Re: is order urgent doubt
- From: jacob navia
- Re: is order urgent doubt
- From: Eric Sosman
- is order urgent doubt
- Prev by Date: Re: what is the output of this program?
- Next by Date: Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable
- Previous by thread: Re: is order urgent doubt
- Next by thread: Re: is order urgent doubt
- Index(es):