[ot]Re: Re-use the argument?
- From: pete <pfiland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 04:04:27 -0400
Richard Heathfield wrote:
Richard Tobin said:
<snip>
The key is to be clear.
No argument there - I'm just nit-hunting right now.
For example, consider
a function to determine kinetic energy given mass and speed:
You can't. You need the velocity, not the speed.
No; you need the speed.
Energy isn't a vector quantity.
http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/GBSSCI/PHYS/Class/energy/u5l1c.html
--
pete
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ot]Re: Re-use the argument?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: [ot]Re: Re-use the argument?
- References:
- Re-use the argument?
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Re: Re-use the argument?
- From: Richard
- Re: Re-use the argument?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: Re-use the argument?
- From: Richard
- Re: Re-use the argument?
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: Re-use the argument?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re-use the argument?
- Prev by Date: finding color of bits
- Next by Date: Re: finding color of bits
- Previous by thread: Re: Re-use the argument?
- Next by thread: Re: [ot]Re: Re-use the argument?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|