Re: OOP
- From: Sjouke Burry <burrynulnulfour@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:50:25 +0200
campyhapper@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi folks,Why not just use the features you want and ignore the
I tend to prefer C, and of course I know that structs
can be used in C to achieve something like
an object-oriented design. And I prefer C in part
because C++ has, I think, grown into a bit of a
monster wherein readability is sacrificed.
But I wonder, has anyone ever tried to create a
sort of lite version of C++, a C+ if you will, that adds
to C just a few key features and disallows things
like templates, multiple inheritance and the like?
Thanks.
ones you dont like??
The language will work just as well.
.
- References:
- OOP
- From: campyhapper
- OOP
- Prev by Date: Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f)
- Next by Date: Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int
- Previous by thread: Re: OOP
- Next by thread: Re: YAPL - Yet Another Programming Language
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|