Re: OOP



campyhapper@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi folks,

I tend to prefer C, and of course I know that structs
can be used in C to achieve something like
an object-oriented design. And I prefer C in part
because C++ has, I think, grown into a bit of a
monster wherein readability is sacrificed.
But I wonder, has anyone ever tried to create a
sort of lite version of C++, a C+ if you will, that adds
to C just a few key features and disallows things
like templates, multiple inheritance and the like?

Thanks.
Why not just use the features you want and ignore the
ones you dont like??
The language will work just as well.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OOP
    ... and of course I know that structs ... an object-oriented design. ... to C just a few key features and disallows things ... http://pitcher.digitalfreehold.ca/ | GPG public key available by request ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: OOP
    ... and of course I know that structs ... an object-oriented design. ... monster wherein readability is sacrificed. ... to C just a few key features and disallows things ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: OOP
    ... and of course I know that structs ... an object-oriented design. ... multiple inheritance and the like? ... Here's your cue Jacob. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • OOP
    ... and of course I know that structs ... an object-oriented design. ... like templates, multiple inheritance and the like? ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: OOP
    ... an object-oriented design. ... to C just a few key features and disallows things ... Keith Thompson kst-u@xxxxxxx ... Nokia ...
    (comp.lang.c)