Re: Comment on trim string function please
- From: Willem <willem@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:43:40 +0000 (UTC)
Bill Reid wrote:
) (I turn them ALL off, which means sub-scripting is not converted
) to pointers, which I believe takes longer, so to retain the speed
) I've manually converted most of the stuff like this).
As far as I know, there is no speed difference between sub-scripting
and pointers on most modern CPUs.
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comment on trim string function please
- From: Bill Reid
- Re: Comment on trim string function please
- References:
- Comment on trim string function please
- From: swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Comment on trim string function please
- From: Jens Thoms Toerring
- Re: Comment on trim string function please
- From: Bill Reid
- Comment on trim string function please
- Prev by Date: Re: Why do you like C more than other programming languages?
- Next by Date: Re: Passing Dynaically-Sized Arrays
- Previous by thread: Re: Comment on trim string function please
- Next by thread: Re: Comment on trim string function please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|