Re: C99 IDE for windows
- From: Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:26:40 +0100
Ron Ford <ron@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:45:44 +0200, Joachim Schmitz posted:
Ron Ford wrote:
The development environment for gcc is austere.
gcc is not C99 compliant either.
How close is it?
Closer than even their own status pages suggests:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/c99status.html
That reports wide character support as "missing" but as far as I can
tell, the only thing missing is format checking for the w* family
(i.e. you don't get a compile-time warning for wprintf(L"%d"); but you
do for printf("%d);).
VLAs are reported as broken, but I can't find an example of how. All
the obscure cases I have tried work -- no doubt I am not being devious
enough. Can anyone else find one?
--
Ben.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: C99 IDE for windows
- From: Harald van Dijk
- Re: C99 IDE for windows
- From: Willem
- Re: C99 IDE for windows
- References:
- C99 IDE for windows
- From: Ron Ford
- Re: C99 IDE for windows
- From: Joachim Schmitz
- Re: C99 IDE for windows
- From: Ron Ford
- C99 IDE for windows
- Prev by Date: Re: C99 IDE for windows
- Next by Date: Re: C99 IDE for windows
- Previous by thread: Re: C99 IDE for windows
- Next by thread: Re: C99 IDE for windows
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|