Re: $ & _

From: Ian Collins <ian-news@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:38:51 +1200

Mabden wrote:

"Ian Collins" <ian-news@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6f8737F9gq07U10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

santosh wrote:
Not to mention C and buffer overflows :) Although the browser
vulnerabilities are faults of the implementation, not the language.

There is no "C buffer overload" problem. But there are many programmers who
need to get *** done "Right Now!".

Buffer overloads are a CTO contagion, NOT a problem with C. So we agree.

Do we? I haven't a clue what a "C buffer overload" is.

--
Ian Collins.
.

References:
- $ & _
  - From: antianti
- Re: $ & _
  - From: antianti
- Re: $ & _
  - From: Mark McIntyre
- Re: $ & _
  - From: Ian Collins
- Re: $ & _
  - From: santosh
- Re: $ & _
  - From: Ian Collins
- Re: $ & _
  - From: Mabden

Prev by Date: Re: stream io in c
Next by Date: file deletion in a directory with some conditions .
Previous by thread: Re: $ & _
Next by thread: Re: $ & _
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread