Re: void pointers

From: santosh <santosh.k83@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:17:39 +0530

CBFalconer wrote:

Ben Bacarisse wrote:

CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

... snip ...

You are definitely on the wrong group. We deal with standard C,
and things programmable in standard C.

That does not seem to be the case. For example, you discussed your
allocator here and I doubt that is programmable in standard C.

Huh? What is this 'allocator' jazz? One of us is confused.

Nmalloc presumably.

.

References:
- void pointers
  - From: bcpkh
- Re: void pointers
  - From: CBFalconer
- Re: void pointers
  - From: Ben Bacarisse
- Re: void pointers
  - From: CBFalconer

Prev by Date: Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?
Next by Date: Re: void pointers
Previous by thread: Re: void pointers
Next by thread: Re: void pointers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?
... CBFalconer writes: ... snip ... ... are dealing with the C language. ... a way to illuminate the requirements of the standard. ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: macro to control conditional compilation based on date
... Micah Cowan wrote: ... CBFalconer writes: ... snip ... ... It's my silly assumption that the Standard would actually have the ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?
... CBFalconer wrote: ... snip ... ... Yes, this newsgroup is c.l.c. ... Standard, but merely with the behaviour that would be produced if ...
(comp.lang.c)
Re: Some bash questions :-)
... CBFalconer wrote: ... snip ... ... otherwise simply compile the standard C source. ... identifiers, not numbers. ...
(comp.os.linux.misc)
Re: help w/ c/c++ problem
... CBFalconer said: ... is beyond the reach of the standard, ... Google users: ...
(comp.lang.c)