Re: Help with understanding this please
- From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:33:00 -0700
Richard<rgrdev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Keith Thompson <kst-u@xxxxxxx> writes:
Richard<rgrdev@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
lawrence.jones@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
Richard <rgrdev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote [re. casting the return value of malloc]:
Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Why on earth would I do that? What good could it possibly do?
Yeah because C++ is wrong and so was pre Ansi C.
C++ isn't wrong, it's different (C++ programs should use new rather than
malloc). Pre-ANSI C *was* wrong, that's why ANSI changed it.
My point seems to have eluded you. And that is it is NOT obvious. And
Heathfield's reply was less than useless.
Let me draw your attention to the original poster's response to
RH's "less than useless" reply:
Thanks as always...and thanks for the humor or humour...which I know
is lost on some, but is immensely appreciated by myself.
I'm not sure if you are trying to be amusing or typically pedantic and
elusive.
Neither.
If you think
Why on earth would I do that? What good could it possibly do?
is a good answer to a newbies question then you need to take a break.
I don't think it would have been a good answer by itself. It was, in
fact, a preamble to a longer answer (which you naturally snipped)
which explained why there is no good reason to cast the result of
malloc(). Since the person asking the question found the answer *as a
whole* useful, your opinion that it's "less than useless" would seem
to be nothing more than your usual trolling.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@xxxxxxx <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
.
- References:
- Re: Help with understanding this please
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: Help with understanding this please
- From: mdh
- Re: Help with understanding this please
- From: Richard
- Re: Help with understanding this please
- From: Richard
- Re: Help with understanding this please
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: Help with understanding this please
- From: Richard
- Re: Help with understanding this please
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with understanding this please
- Next by Date: Re: diffrence?
- Previous by thread: Re: Help with understanding this please
- Next by thread: Re: Help with understanding this please
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|