Re: Doubts about free()
- From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:29:38 -0700
Ian Collins <ian-news@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
vippstar@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Oct 31, 2:49 pm, Pawel Dziepak <pdzie...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Assuming there is a need for memory by some other process and no otherI don't think that <snip>
free memory is available, is it the case malloc for the other process
would fail under such circumstances. Does the OS do some kind of
tracking and free up this memory. Is there any way to force freeing up
the memory to the system back.
Please don't remove attribution lines.
<http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote1.html>
Why pick on this bloke rather than that arrogant prat Burditt?
Not speaking for vippstar, but experience has shown that picking on
that arrogant prat Burditt is ineffective.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@xxxxxxx <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
.
- References:
- Doubts about free()
- From: pushpakulkar
- Re: Doubts about free()
- From: Pawel Dziepak
- Re: Doubts about free()
- From: vippstar
- Re: Doubts about free()
- From: Ian Collins
- Doubts about free()
- Prev by Date: Re: Doubts about free()
- Next by Date: Re: srand
- Previous by thread: Re: Doubts about free()
- Next by thread: Re: Doubts about free()
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
