Re: Understanding callback
- From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 17:26:45 -0800
kid joe <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Got it, thanks. I guess just not worry about it in practise...[...]
Joe
PS. For people who had problems with my sig, try using a fixed-width font
(i.e. Courier New) - I think you'll like it :-)
I use a fixed-width font. The ASCII art you use as a signature is
reasonably impressive as ASCII art, but it's *way* too long as a
signature. The usual guideline (and I think this may be mentioned in
one of the RFCs) is that a signature should be no more than 4 lines,
not including the "-- " delimiter.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@xxxxxxx <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
.
- References:
- Understanding callback
- From: kid joe
- Re: Understanding callback
- From: jacob navia
- Re: Understanding callback
- From: kid joe
- Re: Understanding callback
- From: Pawel Dziepak
- Re: Understanding callback
- From: kid joe
- Understanding callback
- Prev by Date: Re: Pascal - C (2)
- Next by Date: Re: C and faxes
- Previous by thread: Re: Understanding callback
- Next by thread: Re: Understanding callback
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|