Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe <toe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:25:13 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 18, 10:17 pm, Chris Dollin <chris.dol...@xxxxxx> wrote:
I find the long-sequence objection far less compelling than the what-meaning
objection, but in any case am not advocating a change to the C `==`
definition, that fight having been lost or rendered irrelevant a long
time ago.
There's no point in advocating /any/ changes to C if you ask me...
better to spend your time focusing on bandaids and workarounds.
The situation's a little better with C++ as regards being able to
change and develop the language, but even if you were to come up with
a brilliant idea today it'd probably be 20 years before it actually
makes it into the language. I contacted Bjarne Stroustrup recently to
ask if he was planning a new book to reflect the coming standard of C+
+, and his response was as follows:
"I plan to write a 4th edition, but it'll take me a year or two.
Similarly, it'll take the implementers a year or two to get it all
ready for use."
.
- References:
- Copying Aggregate Data Types in C
- From: Jujitsu Lizard
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C
- From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C
- From: Chris Dollin
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C
- From: Chris Dollin
- Copying Aggregate Data Types in C
- Prev by Date: Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C
- Next by Date: Re: generic linklist
- Previous by thread: Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C
- Next by thread: Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading