comp.lang.c

• Date Index

---

• Simple question regarding the use of ;, Andrew
  • Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, pete
    • Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Moi
      • Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, pete
      • Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, pete
  • Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Bartc
    • Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Keith Thompson
• OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Tony
  • Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, dj3vande
  • Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, JC
  • Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Frank
  • Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, user923005
  • Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Laurent Deniau
  • Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Bartc
  • Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Les Harris
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, JC
• node again.., Bill Cunningham
  • Re: node again.., Keith Thompson
    • Re: node again.., Bill Cunningham
      • Re: node again.., Keith Thompson
  • Re: node again.., Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: node again.., CBFalconer
      • Re: node again.., Keith Thompson
      • Re: node again.., CBFalconer
      • Re: node again.., Richard Tobin
      • Re: node again.., Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: node again.., Keith Thompson
  • Re: node again.., Barry Schwarz
    • Re: node again.., Moi
      • Re: node again.., Bill Cunningham
      • Re: node again.., Bill Cunningham
• Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, __PaTeR
  • Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, __PaTeR
      • Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, pete
      • Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, pete
      • Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, pete
      • Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, pete
      • Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, nick_keighley_nospam
• Graphing Convolution, viper-2
  • Re: Graphing Convolution, vippstar
    • Re: Graphing Convolution, viper-2
    • Message not available
      • Re: Graphing Convolution, viper-2
• "#define" vs "const int", Eric
  • Re: "#define" vs "const int", jacob navia
    • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Ben Pfaff
  • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Ben Pfaff
  • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Malcolm McLean
    • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Keith Thompson
      • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Malcolm McLean
      • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Flash Gordon
      • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Eric
  • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: "#define" vs "const int", blargg
      • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Keith Thompson
  • Re: "#define" vs "const int", CBFalconer
    • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: "#define" vs "const int", CBFalconer
      • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Keith Thompson
      • Re: "#define" vs "const int", James Kuyper
    • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Richard Heathfield
  • Re: "#define" vs "const int", James Kuyper
    • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Flash Gordon
  • Re: "#define" vs "const int", Gordon Burditt
• Call again a variadic function (... variable number of arguments) with same arguments that its variadic wrapper, moreau . steve
  • Re: Call again a variadic function (... variable number of arguments) with same arguments that its variadic wrapper, Flash Gordon
    • Re: Call again a variadic function (... variable number of arguments) with same arguments that its variadic wrapper, moreau . steve
  • Re: Call again a variadic function (... variable number of arguments) with same arguments that its variadic wrapper, Eric Sosman
• Asynchronous i/o?, deostroll
  • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, jacob navia
    • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, CBFalconer
    • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, deostroll
      • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, James Kuyper
      • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, jameskuyper
      • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: Asynchronous i/o?, user923005
• Utah Leather Huron M92532 Collection, chanelwatches
• Juicy Couture Handbag Silver Gray 06003 Collection, chanelwatches
• Marc Jabocs Handbag Cream 200861 Collection, chanelwatches
• Hermes Birkin 30cm Togo Leather Bag Brown Silver Collection, chanelwatches
• Monogram Canvas Pochette Orsay M51790 Collection, chanelwatches
• Louis Vuitton Tahitienne PM Blueviolet Collection, bagsbags02
• Damier Azur Saleya PM N51186 Collection, chanelwatches
• Monogram Mini Lin Lin Saumur XL M95220 Collection, chanelwatches
• Chanel Modern Flap Bag Black 352922A Collection, chanelwatches
• Perforation Speedy 30 Perfo Fuschia M95180 Collection, chanelwatches
• Chloe Bay Handbag Black 097 Collection, chanelwatches
• Utah Six Card And Bill Holder M92074 Collection, chanelwatches
• Balenciaga "Giant Part Time" Bag Coffee 084328 Collection, chanelwatches
• Chanel Patent Leather Bag Red 20061 Collection, chanelwatches
• Gucci NEW BRITT beige white bag Collection, chanelwatches
• Monogram Canvas Exentri Cite M51161 Collection, chanelwatches
• Defacto standard string library, Jon Harrop
  • Re: Defacto standard string library, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: Defacto standard string library, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Defacto standard string library, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Defacto standard string library, user923005
    • Re: Defacto standard string library, user923005
    • Re: Defacto standard string library, pete
      • Re: Defacto standard string library, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Defacto standard string library, user923005
  • Re: Defacto standard string library, CBFalconer
    • Re: Defacto standard string library, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Defacto standard string library, christian.bau
  • Re: Defacto standard string library, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: Defacto standard string library, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Defacto standard string library, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Defacto standard string library, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Defacto standard string library, Richard Harter
      • Re: Defacto standard string library, Keith Thompson
• problem with pthread_cancel, vamsi
  • Re: problem with pthread_cancel, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: problem with pthread_cancel, Keith Thompson
    • Re: problem with pthread_cancel, Keith Thompson
• initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, davoti
  • Re: initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, Keith Thompson
    • Re: initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, CBFalconer
  • Re: initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• C compilers' behaviour for multiple function definition, RealCat
  • Re: C compilers' behaviour for multiple function definition, Sjouke Burry
  • Re: C compilers' behaviour for multiple function definition, dj3vande
  • Re: C compilers' behaviour for multiple function definition, James Kuyper
• moving averages, Bill Cunningham
• fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, Tagore
  • Re: fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, CBFalconer
      • Re: fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, Eric Sosman
  • Re: fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, Andrew McMeikan
    • Re: fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, Ben Bacarisse
• char is signed or unsigned?, Tagore
  • Message not available
    • Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Ben Pfaff
  • Message not available
    • Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Tagore
      • Message not available
      • Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: char is signed or unsigned?, pete
      • Message not available
      • Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Default User
  • Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Thad Smith
    • Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: char is signed or unsigned?, J. J. Farrell
• Re: Error handling in C, Tony
  • Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper
    • Re: Error handling in C, Tony
      • Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Error handling in C, Tony
      • Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Error handling in C, Tony
      • Re: Error handling in C, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Error handling in C, Tony
      • Re: Error handling in C, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Error handling in C, Tony
      • Re: Error handling in C, Kenny McCormack
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Error handling in C, Tony
  • Re: Error handling in C, Tony
    • Re: Error handling in C, blargg
      • Re: Error handling in C, Tony
      • Re: Error handling in C, blargg
      • Re: Error handling in C, Tony
    • Re: Error handling in C, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: Error handling in C, Tony
  • Re: Error handling in C, Tony
    • Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Error handling in C, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Error handling in C, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Error handling in C, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Error handling in C, blargg
      • Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Error handling in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Error handling in C, c prog fan
      • Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Error handling in C, jameskuyper
      • Re: Error handling in C, Willem
      • Re: Error handling in C, c prog fan
      • Re: Error handling in C, Bartc
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Error handling in C, Rick Dearman
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Error handling in C, Richard Harter
  • Re: Error handling in C, nick_keighley_nospam
• www.iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes., www.iofferkicks.com
• fgets not doing as I expect., Andrew McMeikan
  • Re: fgets not doing as I expect., William Pursell
    • Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Andrew McMeikan
      • Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: fgets not doing as I expect., pete
      • Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Andrew McMeikan
      • Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Barry Schwarz
      • Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Andrew McMeikan
      • Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Barry Schwarz
  • Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Keith Thompson
  • Re: fgets not doing as I expect., CBFalconer
• Online Trading, money_maker
• Financial libraries in C?, ccalls001
  • Re: Financial libraries in C?, vippstar
    • Re: Financial libraries in C?, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla
      • Re: Financial libraries in C?, ccalls001
      • Re: Financial libraries in C?, vippstar
      • Re: Financial libraries in C?, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Financial libraries in C?, ccalls001
      • Re: Financial libraries in C?, CBFalconer
  • Re: Financial libraries in C?, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Financial libraries in C?, ccalls001
  • Re: Financial libraries in C?, user923005
    • Re: Financial libraries in C?, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Financial libraries in C?, user923005
• Pass by reference?, __PaTeR
  • Re: Pass by reference?, pete
  • Re: Pass by reference?, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: Pass by reference?, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Pass by reference?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Pass by reference?, __PaTeR
      • Re: Pass by reference?, __PaTeR
      • Re: Pass by reference?, James Kuyper
      • Re: Pass by reference?, Barry Schwarz
• reassigning pointers, Chad
  • Re: reassigning pointers, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: reassigning pointers, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: reassigning pointers, Chad
      • Re: reassigning pointers, vippstar
      • Re: reassigning pointers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: reassigning pointers, vippstar
      • Re: reassigning pointers, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: reassigning pointers, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: reassigning pointers, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: reassigning pointers, vippstar
      • Re: reassigning pointers, Harald van Dijk
      • Trolls (was: reassigning pointers), CBFalconer
      • Re: reassigning pointers, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: reassigning pointers, James Kuyper
      • Re: reassigning pointers, christian.bau
• moving average, Bill Cunningham
  • Re: moving average, Joachim Schmitz
  • Re: moving average, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: moving average, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: moving average, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: moving average, pete
  • Re: moving average, CBFalconer
    • Re: moving average, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: moving average, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: moving average, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: moving average, Default User
      • Re: moving average, CBFalconer
      • Re: moving average, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: moving average, Ben Bacarisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: moving average, Bill Cunningham
    • Message not available
      • Re: moving average, CBFalconer
      • Re: moving average, Keith Thompson
      • Re: moving average, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: moving average, Keith Thompson
      • Message not available
      • Re: moving average, Keith Thompson
• C language, ikcchowdhury
  • Re: C language, tommyprep
    • Re: C language, Richard Bos
  • Re: C language, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: C language, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C language, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C language, Doug Miller
  • Re: C language, george972
• fifo algotithm, cerr
  • Re: fifo algotithm, Eric Sosman
  • Re: fifo algotithm, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: fifo algotithm, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: fifo algotithm, cerr
      • Re: fifo algotithm, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: fifo algotithm, cerr
      • Re: fifo algotithm, Keith Thompson
      • Re: fifo algotithm, cerr
      • Re: fifo algotithm, cerr
      • Re: fifo algotithm, Keith Thompson
      • Re: fifo algotithm, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: fifo algotithm, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: fifo algotithm, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: fifo algotithm, CBFalconer
      • Re: fifo algotithm, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: fifo algotithm, Barry Schwarz
• Ensure your success in SCJP,SCWCD,OCP,OCA, Oracle, Java exams @TechFaq360.com, techfaq360.com@xxxxxxxxx
• Displaying enum symbol names in GDB, omkar pangarkar
  • Re: Displaying enum symbol names in GDB, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: Displaying enum symbol names in GDB, Ulrich Eckhardt
    • Re: Displaying enum symbol names in GDB, omkar pangarkar
• tr-alike character replace function, Mik
  • Re: tr-alike character replace function, William Pursell
    • Re: tr-alike character replace function, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: tr-alike character replace function, Mik
      • Re: tr-alike character replace function, Anthony Fremont
• Funny Christmas wallpapers, theme & 15,999$/- per day, HAPPY NEW YEAR Funny Christmas wallpapers, theme Free Funny Christmas Wallpaper Software Downloads and earn 15,999$/-
• where is stdarg.h of gcc, mobile . parmenides
  • Re: where is stdarg.h of gcc, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: where is stdarg.h of gcc, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: where is stdarg.h of gcc, Keith Thompson
    • Re: where is stdarg.h of gcc, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: where is stdarg.h of gcc, Keith Thompson
• Wish you Merry Christmas and a Happy & Prosperous New Year, ilogic consulting
• Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Kenneth Kan
  • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Kenneth Kan
    • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Kenneth Kan
      • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Kenneth Kan
  • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Moi
  • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Ike Naar
  • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Thad Smith
  • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Barry Schwarz
  • Message not available
    • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Keith Thompson
• Raising a Number doubt..?, cnoe
  • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, user923005
  • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, user923005
      • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, jacob navia
  • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Bartc
    • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, user923005
      • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, user923005
      • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Bartc
      • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Bartc
  • Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Dik T. Winter
• typedef v/s macro, Tagore
  • Re: typedef v/s macro, Keith Thompson
• Order of passing of parameters?, Tagore
  • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, James Harris
      • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, jameskuyper
      • [OT] English spelling (was: Order of passing of parameters?), CBFalconer
      • Re: [OT] English spelling, George
      • Re: [OT] English spelling (was: Order of passing of parameters?), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Bartc
      • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Tony Quinn
      • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, user923005
  • Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Stephen Sprunk
• Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Stephan Beal
  • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Eric Sosman
    • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Stephan Beal
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Flash Gordon
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), August Karlstrom
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), s0suk3
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), William Pursell
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Eric Sosman
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Eric Sosman
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), James Kuyper
    • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), c prog fan
  • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Barry Schwarz
• How to print like this?, JOYCE
  • Re: How to print like this?, Barry Schwarz
• A question on argument passing, M. Azam
  • Re: A question on argument passing, Eric Sosman
  • Re: A question on argument passing, Keith Thompson
    • Re: A question on argument passing, M. Azam
• Problem with realloc (I think), DSF
  • Re: Problem with realloc (I think), Eric Sosman
    • Re: Problem with realloc (I think), DSF
• va_list usage from multiple functions?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• combination of a string and queries, Tagore
  • Re: combination of a string and queries, Tagore
  • Re: combination of a string and queries, user923005
• Type-checking casts for GNU C, Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
    • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, jameskuyper
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Ian Collins
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, jameskuyper
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Ian Collins
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, jameskuyper
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, jameskuyper
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Ian Collins
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, blargg
    • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Jan Engelhardt
  • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan
  • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, blargg
    • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, blargg
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, blargg
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Ian Collins
      • Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, blargg
• query, swarnabl85
  • Re: query, Keith Thompson
  • Re: query, CBFalconer
    • Re: query, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: query, jan olieslagers
      • Re: query, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: query, Keith Thompson
      • Re: query, CBFalconer
      • Re: query, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: query, jameskuyper
      • Re: query, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: query, Antoninus Twink
• A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, RAKHE
  • Message not available
    • Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, RAKHE
      • Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, Flash Gordon
      • Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, RAKHE
  • Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, Keith Thompson
      • Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, CBFalconer
    • Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, CBFalconer
• Storing a pointer in an int?, Evan Klitzke
  • Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, user923005
  • Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, James Kuyper
    • Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, user923005
      • Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, jameskuyper
      • Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, Dik T. Winter
• fgets problem, Alan Peake
  • Re: fgets problem, Eric Sosman
    • Re: fgets problem, Keith Thompson
    • Re: fgets problem, Alan Peake
      • Re: fgets problem, Phil Carmody
      • Re: fgets problem, Alan Peake
      • Re: fgets problem, Keith Thompson
      • Re: fgets problem, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: fgets problem, CBFalconer
      • Re: fgets problem, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: fgets problem, Keith Thompson
    • Re: fgets problem, Eric Sosman
    • Re: fgets problem, Alan Peake
      • Re: fgets problem, vippstar
      • Re: fgets problem, Keith Thompson
      • Re: fgets problem, vippstar
      • Re: fgets problem, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: fgets problem, Alan Peake
      • Re: fgets problem, James Kuyper
      • Re: fgets problem, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: fgets problem, Keith Thompson
      • Re: fgets problem, pete
  • Re: fgets problem, CBFalconer
    • Re: fgets problem, vippstar
      • Re: fgets problem, CBFalconer
  • Re: fgets problem, Barry Schwarz
• Part / Full Time Internet Jobs, manoj256sharma@xxxxxxxxx
• pointer/linked List clarification, Peter
  • Re: pointer/linked List clarification, blargg
    • Re: pointer/linked List clarification, Peter
      • Re: pointer/linked List clarification, blargg
      • Re: pointer/linked List clarification, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: pointer/linked List clarification, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: pointer/linked List clarification, Chad
      • Re: pointer/linked List clarification, blargg
      • Re: pointer/linked List clarification, Peter
• (slightly OT) info needed, george972
  • Re: (slightly OT) info needed, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: (slightly OT) info needed, c prog fan
• "Replace" function goes in overflow, pater
  • Re: "Replace" function goes in overflow, Richard
    • Re: "Replace" function goes in overflow, Keith Thompson
  • Re: "Replace" function goes in overflow, Eric Sosman
• signed and unsigned Sign bit doubt, hari
  • Re: signed and unsigned Sign bit doubt, Eric Sosman
    • Re: signed and unsigned Sign bit doubt, Eric Sosman
  • Re: signed and unsigned Sign bit doubt, Keith Thompson
  • Re: signed and unsigned Sign bit doubt, CBFalconer
• Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, 张扬 Santa
  • Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, s0suk3
  • Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, 张扬 Santa
    • Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, s0suk3
      • Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, Jack Klein
    • Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, CBFalconer
• offset, henry
  • Re: offset, James Kuyper
  • Re: offset, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: offset, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: offset, James Kuyper
  • Re: offset, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: offset, CBFalconer
    • Re: offset, James Kuyper
• Error: sh: cannot duplicate fd 31 to fd 0: Bad file descriptor, bgold12
  • Re: Error: sh: cannot duplicate fd 31 to fd 0: Bad file descriptor, Jack Klein
  • Re: Error: sh: cannot duplicate fd 31 to fd 0: Bad file descriptor, James Kuyper
• C is a Middle level language...., adgaur . niit
  • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Coos Haak
  • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Keith Thompson
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., user923005
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., jameskuyper
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., user923005
    • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Ian Collins
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Phil Carmody
    • Re: C is a Middle level language...., August Karlstrom
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., James Kuyper
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Richard Heathfield
    • Re: C is a Middle level language...., xyzzybill
      • Re: C is a Middle level language...., Keith Thompson
• is byte allocated, sinbad
  • Re: is byte allocated, Keith Thompson
    • Re: is byte allocated, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: is byte allocated, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: is byte allocated, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: is byte allocated, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: is byte allocated, CBFalconer
      • Re: is byte allocated, Ian Collins
    • Re: is byte allocated, sinbad
      • Re: is byte allocated, Flash Gordon
• Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, vippstar
    • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Richard
      • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Richard
      • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Anthony Fremont
    • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, CBFalconer
      • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Richard
      • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, vippstar
      • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Richard
  • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Anthony Fremont
    • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Flash Gordon
    • Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, lawrence . jones
• Robotix, rahul
• Basic doubt in datatypes of signed and unsigned, hari
  • Re: Basic doubt in datatypes of signed and unsigned, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: Basic doubt in datatypes of signed and unsigned, James Kuyper
    • Re: Basic doubt in datatypes of signed and unsigned, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Basic doubt in datatypes of signed and unsigned, James Kuyper
  • Re: Basic doubt in datatypes of signed and unsigned, Jack Klein
• Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins
  • Re: A question about pointer of array., pete
    • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., blargg
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins
    • Re: A question about pointer of array., CBFalconer
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Richard
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., pete
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., CBFalconer
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Harald van Dijk
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., jameskuyper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
    • Re: A question about pointer of array., Jack Klein
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson
  • Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson
    • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Phil Carmody
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Phil Carmody
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., vippstar
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Richard Tobin
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Harald van Dijk
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., jameskuyper
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., lawrence . jones
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., jameskuyper
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Phil Carmody
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Phil Carmody
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., CBFalconer
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Flash Gordon
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., CBFalconer
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., CBFalconer
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Flash Gordon
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Richard Tobin
      • Re: A question about pointer of array., Phil Carmody
  • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: A question about pointer of array., pete
  • Re: A question about pointer of array., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: A question about pointer of array., Ben Bacarisse
• total noob- call c function from c#, Adam Chapman
  • Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Keith Thompson
  • Re: total noob- call c function from c#, CBFalconer
    • Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Lassie
      • Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Keith Thompson
      • Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Lassie
    • Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• reading a config file, jan olieslagers
  • Re: reading a config file, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: reading a config file, Chad
  • Re: reading a config file, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: reading a config file, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: reading a config file, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: reading a config file, jan olieslagers
• Merging Linked List in C, dmp
  • Re: Merging Linked List in C, pete
  • Re: Merging Linked List in C, Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: Merging Linked List in C, MisterE
  • Re: Merging Linked List in C, CBFalconer
  • Re: Merging Linked List in C, Richard Bos
  • Re: Merging Linked List in C, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Merging Linked List in C, user923005
• Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, CBFalconer
    • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, CBFalconer
      • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, CBFalconer
      • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, CBFalconer
      • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE, jkfffffffffff
• pointer question, the . cool . dude . man
  • Re: pointer question, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: pointer question, Keith Thompson
  • Re: pointer question, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: pointer question, James Kuyper
• Re: simple region allocator..., Chris M. Thomasson
• Big Tits Big Boobs, blady
  • Re: Big Tits Big Boobs, Charles Richmond
    • Re: Big Tits Big Boobs, vippstar
• Example pdcurses, And ||
  • Re: Example pdcurses, vippstar
  • Re: Example pdcurses, jameskuyper
  • Re: Example pdcurses, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Example pdcurses, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• HTTP://WWW.STREETCANDY.ORG, nikeshoe.nike30@xxxxxxxxx
• gotoxy in linux?, Psi
  • Re: gotoxy in linux?, Joachim Schmitz
  • Re: gotoxy in linux?, mstorkamp
    • Re: gotoxy in linux?, Andrew McMeikan
• 15000$ per month, sapanapappu@xxxxxxxxx
• Nike Jordans Fusion 23 AIR Jordan 22 Jordan Fusions 21 AIR Jordans, salewholexian
• obfiscated code, Mark
  • Re: obfiscated code, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: obfiscated code, Keith Thompson
  • Re: obfiscated code, Chris Dollin
    • Re: obfiscated code, vippstar
  • Re: obfiscated code, CBFalconer
    • Re: obfiscated code, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: obfiscated code, CBFalconer
      • Re: obfiscated code, Keith Thompson
      • Re: obfiscated code, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: obfiscated code, Keith Thompson
      • Re: obfiscated code, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: obfiscated code, Richard Tobin
      • Re: obfiscated code, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: obfiscated code, Richard Tobin
      • Re: obfiscated code, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: obfiscated code, CBFalconer
      • Re: obfiscated code, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: obfiscated code, pete
      • Re: obfiscated code, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: obfiscated code, pete
      • Re: obfiscated code, Keith Thompson
      • Re: obfiscated code, Richard Tobin
      • Re: obfiscated code, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: obfiscated code, pete
      • Re: obfiscated code, pete
      • Re: obfiscated code, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: obfiscated code, pete
      • Re: obfiscated code, Keith Thompson
      • Re: obfiscated code, CBFalconer
      • Re: obfiscated code, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: obfiscated code, pete
      • Re: obfiscated code, Nate Eldredge
• Thanks to all, dmp
  • Re: Thanks to all, Bill Reid
  • Re: Thanks to all, CBFalconer
• UGG shoes hot wholesale, yahoo808
• generic linklist, aditya
  • Re: generic linklist, maverik
  • Re: generic linklist, Eric Sosman
  • Re: generic linklist, Chris Dollin
    • Re: generic linklist, Phil Carmody
  • Re: generic linklist, John Bode
  • Re: generic linklist, CBFalconer
    • Re: generic linklist, Richard
      • Re: generic linklist, CBFalconer
  • Re: generic linklist, pete
  • Re: generic linklist, Chris M. Thomasson
    • Re: generic linklist, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: generic linklist, Chris M. Thomasson
  • Re: generic linklist, xyzzybill
  • Re: generic linklist, gw7rib
    • Re: generic linklist, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: generic linklist, gw7rib
    • Re: generic linklist, blargg
      • Re: generic linklist, Chris M. Thomasson
      • Re: generic linklist, pete
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • generic linklist, Borked Pseudo Mailed
    • Re: generic linklist, pete
      • Re: generic linklist, CBFalconer
      • Re: generic linklist, pete
• Structures, dmp
  • Re: Structures, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Structures, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Structures, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Structures, maverik
      • Re: Structures, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Structures, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Structures, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Structures, Joachim Schmitz
• float() function, jan olieslagers
  • Re: float() function, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: float() function, Keith Thompson
  • Re: float() function, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: float() function, jan olieslagers
• Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Jujitsu Lizard
  • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, vippstar
  • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, jameskuyper
    • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Kevin D . Quitt
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, jameskuyper
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Kevin D . Quitt
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, vippstar
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, lawrence . jones
  • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, pete
  • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer
    • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Sjouke Burry
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, jameskuyper
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, James Kuyper
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Bos
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, pete
• Re: Valid C syntax., emoh
  • Re: Valid C syntax., jameskuyper
  • Re: Valid C syntax., Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Valid C syntax., pete
    • Re: Valid C syntax., pete
      • Re: Valid C syntax., Richard Tobin
• Help with system() call in C, sunny4frenz
  • Re: Help with system() call in C, Richard Heathfield
• Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, s0suk3
  • Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, christian.bau
    • Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, christian.bau
      • Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, jameskuyper
    • Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Moi
• gcc compiler options for K&R C code Options, Utkado
  • Re: gcc compiler options for K&R C code Options, Keith Thompson
    • Re: gcc compiler options for K&R C code Options, Eric Sosman
  • Re: gcc compiler options for K&R C code Options, nicolas . sitbon
• Const Char & Char Const, tommyprep
  • Re: Const Char & Char Const, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: Const Char & Char Const, pete
    • Re: Const Char & Char Const, tommyprep
  • Re: Const Char & Char Const, CBFalconer
    • Re: Const Char & Char Const, Jack Klein
      • Re: Const Char & Char Const, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Const Char & Char Const, pete
    • Re: Const Char & Char Const, James Kuyper
• get_defined_vars, Giulio Orrù
  • Re: get_defined_vars, Keith Thompson
  • Re: get_defined_vars, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: get_defined_vars, Giulio Orrù
• websit, abhaysin59
  • Re: websit, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: websit, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: websit, jan olieslagers
• comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, pete
  • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar
    • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, pete
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Chris Dollin
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Chris Dollin
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Phil Carmody
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, pete
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, pete
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Hallvard B Furuseth
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Hallvard B Furuseth
  • Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Barry Schwarz
• Stack depth, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: Stack depth, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: Stack depth, Richard Bos
  • Re: Stack depth, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Stack depth, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Stack depth, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: Stack depth, Gene
    • Re: Stack depth, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Stack depth, James Kuyper
      • Re: Stack depth, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Stack depth, jameskuyper
      • Re: Stack depth, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Stack depth, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: Stack depth, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Stack depth, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: Stack depth, Bartc
      • Re: Stack depth, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• sizeof unpadded struct size, sinbad
  • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Ian Collins
    • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, pete
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody
    • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, pete
  • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper
  • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Chris Dollin
    • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Bartc
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Eric Sosman
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Bartc
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, CBFalconer
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Chris Dollin
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Bartc
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, sinbad
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Chris Dollin
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper
      • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Eric Sosman
  • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Peter Nilsson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • sizeof unpadded struct size, Nomen Nescio
  • sizeof unpadded struct size, George Orwell
    • Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Peter Nilsson
• Making an executable file from a program, Sowrabh
  • Re: Making an executable file from a program, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Making an executable file from a program, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Making an executable file from a program, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: Making an executable file from a program, Bartc
      • Re: Making an executable file from a program, Richard Heathfield
• Returning structs, Jon Harrop
  • Re: Returning structs, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: Returning structs, James Kuyper
    • Re: Returning structs, Jon Harrop
      • Re: Returning structs, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Returning structs, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Returning structs, Jon Harrop
      • Re: Returning structs, jacob navia
      • Re: Returning structs, CBFalconer
      • Re: Returning structs, James Kuyper
      • Re: Returning structs, jacob navia
      • Re: Returning structs, CBFalconer
      • Re: Returning structs, jameskuyper
      • Re: Returning structs, jacob navia
      • Re: Returning structs, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Returning structs, jacob navia
      • Re: Returning structs, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Returning structs, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Returning structs, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Returning structs, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Returning structs, jacob navia
    • Re: Returning structs, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Returning structs, Jon Harrop
      • Re: Returning structs, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Returning structs, jacob navia
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Returning structs, Nomen Nescio
• Corruption in Montavista and not in RedHat, Anonymous
• /*Apologize [OT]*/, c . prog . fan
  • Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, Joachim Schmitz
  • Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, jameskuyper
  • Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, James Harris
  • Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, Andreas Eibach
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • /*Apologize [OT]*/, George Orwell
    • Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, James Harris
• Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider
  • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider
      • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Mark L Pappin
    • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider
      • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider
      • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider
    • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Peter Nilsson
  • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider
• Pointer Type, polas
  • Re: Pointer Type, Lew Pitcher
  • Re: Pointer Type, pete
• Software anti-bugs, M.Caggiano
  • Re: Software anti-bugs, James Kuyper
    • Re: Software anti-bugs, M.Caggiano
      • Re: Software anti-bugs, jameskuyper
  • Re: Software anti-bugs, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: Software anti-bugs, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Software anti-bugs, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Software anti-bugs, Chris McDonald
      • Re: Software anti-bugs, Andrew Smallshaw
      • Re: Software anti-bugs, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Software anti-bugs, pete
      • Re: Software anti-bugs, Andrew Smallshaw
      • Re: Software anti-bugs, pete
  • Re: Software anti-bugs, user923005
• Where is max/min ?, Steven Woody
  • Re: Where is max/min ?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Where is max/min ?, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: Where is max/min ?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Where is max/min ?, Steven Woody
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Ian Collins
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Steven Woody
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Bartc
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, vippstar
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, pete
    • Re: Where is max/min ?, vippstar
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, pete
  • Re: Where is max/min ?, jacob navia
    • Re: Where is max/min ?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, jacob navia
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, jacob navia
    • Re: Where is max/min ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Where is max/min ?, jacob navia
• size of a struct without "sizeof", srikar2097
  • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield
    • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Harald van Dijk
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", srikar2097
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Default User
  • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson
    • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Tobin
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", srikar2097
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Tobin
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Ben Pfaff
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Tobin
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", pete
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Tobin
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Tobin
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Eric Sosman
    • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Phil Carmody
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield
    • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Eric Sosman
  • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Bos
    • Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson
• Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman
  • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, jameskuyper
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Amandil
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, jameskuyper
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous
  • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Joachim Schmitz
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Kenny McCormack
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed
  • ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Kenny McCormack
  • ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, CBFalconer
  • ENV VAR addresses, George Orwell
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Keith Thompson
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Eric Sosman
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, CBFalconer
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield
  • ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, nick_keighley_nospam
  • ENV VAR addresses, Nomen Nescio
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Antoninus Twink
  • ENV VAR addresses, Nomen Nescio
  • ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous
  • ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield
  • ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed
  • ENV VAR addresses, Nomen Nescio
  • ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous
  • ENV VAR addresses, Nomen Nescio
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Tobin
  • ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed
  • ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous
  • ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Anthony Fremont
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Bos
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, CBFalconer
  • ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous
  • ENV VAR addresses, George Orwell
  • ENV VAR addresses, George Orwell
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Keith Thompson
  • ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous
  • ENV VAR addresses, George Orwell
  • ENV VAR addresses, George Orwell
  • ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed
  • ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Bos
  • ENV VAR addresses, George Orwell
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, Antoninus Twink
  • ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed
• How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Louise Hoffman
  • Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Zero
  • Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Zero
    • Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Louise Hoffman
  • Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Louise Hoffman
  • Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, CBFalconer
    • Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Andrew Smallshaw
      • Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, CBFalconer
• [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, pater
  • Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Keith Thompson
    • Re: ENV VAR addresses, pater
  • Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Andrew Smallshaw
    • Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Anthony Fremont
  • Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Flash Gordon
  • Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Richard Tobin
  • Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Chris Dollin
• [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Jujitsu Lizard
  • Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Anthony Fremont
    • Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Chris M. Thomasson
      • Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Queue Data Structure Question, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: Queue Data Structure Question, Jujitsu Lizard
• !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero
  • Re: Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Keith Thompson
    • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, pete
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, August Karlstrom
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, pete
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, John Bode
    • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, David Thompson
  • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Richard Tobin
  • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero
  • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, James Kuyper
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, August Karlstrom
      • Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, James Kuyper
• reading input from a system call, jan olieslagers
  • Re: reading input from a system call, Joachim Schmitz
    • Re: reading input from a system call, Joachim Schmitz
  • Re: reading input from a system call, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: reading input from a system call, vippstar
    • Re: reading input from a system call, jan olieslagers
      • Re: reading input from a system call, Keith Thompson
    • Re: reading input from a system call, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: reading input from a system call, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: reading input from a system call, jan olieslagers
      • Re: reading input from a system call, Ben Bacarisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • reading input from a system call, Anonymous
    • Re: reading input from a system call, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: reading input from a system call, vippstar
      • Re: reading input from a system call, vippstar
      • Re: reading input from a system call, Eric Sosman
      • Re: reading input from a system call, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: reading input from a system call, CBFalconer
      • Re: reading input from a system call, Joachim Schmitz
  • reading input from a system call, Borked Pseudo Mailed
    • Re: reading input from a system call, vippstar
• err: req for member in something not struct, Kyle Blake
  • Re: err: req for member in something not struct, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: err: req for member in something not struct, Kyle Blake
      • Re: err: req for member in something not struct, vippstar
      • Re: err: req for member in something not struct, Kyle Blake
  • Re: err: req for member in something not struct, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: err: req for member in something not struct, Kyle Blake
• Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anonymous
  • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer
  • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Jujitsu Lizard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Borked Pseudo Mailed
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Malcolm McLean
  • Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anonymous
  • Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, George Orwell
  • Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, George Orwell
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink
  • Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Nomen Nescio
  • Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, George Orwell
• malloc() and C compiler bickering, srikar2097
  • Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, srikar2097
      • Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, srikar2097
      • Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, srikar2097
  • Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, Coos Haak
    • Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, Coos Haak
• [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, vippstar
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, vippstar
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, srikar2097
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Old Wolf
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Bos
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Bos
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer
  • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Jujitsu Lizard
  • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, jacob navia
    • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Jack Klein
    • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc
    • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Phil Carmody
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, J. J. Farrell
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, James Kuyper
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Phil Carmody
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Phil Carmody
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Phil Carmody
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard
      • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Bos
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Bos
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, jameskuyper
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Joe Wright
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, J. J. Farrell
  • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, soscpd
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, soscpd
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H
    • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard
      • Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer
• Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, vippstar
    • Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, vippstar
      • Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Harald van Dijk
• Why not a redefinition?, Bo Yang
  • Re: Why not a redefinition?, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Why not a redefinition?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Why not a redefinition?, Nate Eldredge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Why not a redefinition?, Nomen Nescio
• Borked Pseudo Mailed, Stylianos
  • Re: Borked Pseudo Mailed, pater
• executable file runs on some computers, not all, Andrew
  • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Ian Collins
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, William Pursell
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, CBFalconer
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Andrew
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Ian Collins
  • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, viza
  • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, CBFalconer
    • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Ian Collins
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, lawrence . jones
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, soscpd
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • executable file runs on some computers, not all, George Orwell
    • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Anthony Fremont
    • Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Kenny McCormack
  • executable file runs on some computers, not all, George Orwell
• Noncompliant codes, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Noncompliant codes, Fred
  • Re: Noncompliant codes, Antoninus Twink
    • Re: Noncompliant codes, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Noncompliant codes, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: Noncompliant codes, vippstar
  • Re: Noncompliant codes, CBFalconer
    • Re: Noncompliant codes, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Noncompliant codes, CBFalconer
    • Re: Noncompliant codes, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Noncompliant codes, Anthony Fremont
• typedef and pointers., srikar2097
  • Re: typedef and pointers., viza
    • Re: typedef and pointers., srikar2097
      • Re: typedef and pointers., Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: typedef and pointers., James Kuyper
      • Re: typedef and pointers., Fred
      • Re: typedef and pointers., jameskuyper
      • Re: typedef and pointers., Jack Klein
      • Re: typedef and pointers., srikar2097
      • Re: typedef and pointers., Richard Bos
      • Re: typedef and pointers., John Bode
      • Re: typedef and pointers., blargg
      • Re: typedef and pointers., David Thompson
• IF YOU WANT TO LIVE LONGER, YOU SHOULD CHECK THIS!!, andrew
• Can any C debugger catch this error?, virtual
  • Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, virtual
      • Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, maverik
  • Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, user923005
• C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Programmatore
  • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, nicolas . sitbon
    • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Programmatore
      • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, nicolas . sitbon
      • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Programmatore
      • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Programmatore
      • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, nicolas . sitbon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Borked Pseudo Mailed
    • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Programmatore
  • C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, George Orwell
  • C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Anonymous
    • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, CBFalconer
  • C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Anonymous
    • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Barry Schwarz
  • C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Nomen Nescio
  • C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Nomen Nescio
  • C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Anonymous
    • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, pater
  • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, rosario
    • Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Richard Bos
  • C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Anonymous
• For more products pls visit: www.king-trade.cn, fffffffffff
• For more products pls visit: www.king-, fffffffffff
• sizeof() and a structure, srikar2097
  • Re: sizeof() and a structure, user923005
  • Re: sizeof() and a structure, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: sizeof() and a structure, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: sizeof() and a structure, Keith Thompson
      • Re: sizeof() and a structure, user923005
      • Re: sizeof() and a structure, Keith Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • sizeof() and a structure, George Orwell
    • Re: sizeof() and a structure, srikar2097
      • Re: sizeof() and a structure, Richard Bos
      • Re: sizeof() and a structure, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: sizeof() and a structure, CBFalconer
  • sizeof() and a structure, Nomen Nescio
• type compatible and const qualifier, nicolas . sitbon
  • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, nicolas . sitbon
      • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, nicolas . sitbon
      • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, vippstar
      • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, nicolas . sitbon
      • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, vippstar
      • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Old Wolf
• Standard U32 typedef, Alfie Noakes
  • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Jensen Somers
    • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, blargg
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, CBFalconer
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Jensen Somers
      • Re: Standard U32 typedef, jameskuyper
  • Re: Standard U32 typedef, Alfie Noakes
• array, Ivan
  • Re: array, viza
    • Re: array, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: array, viza
  • Re: array, Anthony Fremont
    • Re: array, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: array, Anthony Fremont
    • Message not available
      • Re: array, Anthony Fremont
      • Message not available
      • Re: array, Anthony Fremont
    • Re: array, jameskuyper
      • Re: array, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: array, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: array, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: array, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: array, Phil Carmody
      • Re: array, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: array, Chris Dollin
      • Re: array, blargg
      • Re: array, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: array, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: array, Daniel Molina Wegener
• typical problem in C... hot to solve, @$|-|. DUBEY
  • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, @$|-|. DUBEY
      • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, James Kuyper
      • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, @$|-|. DUBEY
      • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, Jack Klein
      • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, @$|-|. DUBEY
      • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, td didi
  • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, Ian Collins
  • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, CBFalconer
  • Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, Keith Thompson
• Retaining the value of the variable across dynamic library, Karthikeyan
  • Re: Retaining the value of the variable across dynamic library, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: Retaining the value of the variable across dynamic library, Gordon Burditt
• How to replace parts of a string with something else, Melroy
  • Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, jaysome
      • Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, blargg
  • Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, virtual
    • Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, David Thompson
  • Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, Keith Thompson
• Assertions that give full function call stack, virtual
  • Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, James Kuyper
  • Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, vippstar
    • Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, James Kuyper
  • Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, viza
  • Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, Bart van Ingen Schenau
• Addressing multidimensional arrays, Baboon
  • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, vippstar
    • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, vippstar
  • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, jameskuyper
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, James Kuyper
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, jameskuyper
• (OT) engines, Ken McD
  • Re: (OT) engines, viza
  • Re: (OT) engines, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: (OT) engines, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: (OT) engines, Keith Thompson
  • Re: (OT) engines, Jujitsu Lizard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • (OT) engines, Borked Pseudo Mailed
• Multiple definition of xxx, Rob Amboss
  • Re: Multiple definition of xxx, Andrew Smallshaw
• Algorithm for Pascal Triangle, dmp
  • Re: Algorithm for Pascal Triangle, user923005
  • Re: Algorithm for Pascal Triangle, nick_keighley_nospam
• Best Build Tool for large C projects, scholz . lothar
  • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, William Pursell
    • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, Border
  • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, Laurent Deniau
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Best Build Tool for large C projects, scholz . lothar
    • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, user923005
      • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, scholz . lothar
    • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, CBFalconer
      • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, scholz . lothar
      • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, Antoninus Twink
    • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, Erik de Castro Lopo
      • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, scholz . lothar
      • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, sylar
    • Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, jacob navia
• conratulations......., john adam
• what should be the output, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: what should be the output, Trent
    • Re: what should be the output, jameskuyper
    • Re: what should be the output, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: what should be the output, vippstar
    • Re: what should be the output, Eric Sosman
      • Re: what should be the output, jameskuyper
      • Re: what should be the output, Eric Sosman
    • Re: what should be the output, Trent
  • Re: what should be the output, Anthony Fremont
    • Re: what should be the output, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: what should be the output, Anthony Fremont
    • Re: what should be the output, jameskuyper
      • Re: what should be the output, Anthony Fremont
• Linking fails, Klaus Pirker
  • Re: Linking fails, pete
    • Re: Linking fails, Joachim Schmitz
    • Re: Linking fails, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Linking fails, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: Linking fails, CBFalconer
  • Re: Linking fails, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: Linking fails, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Linking fails, Richard Heathfield
• Funny & Fancy Pictures, Praveen 08
• Tennis on Helipad, Praveen 08
• Animation & Funny Pics, Praveen 08
• Hidden & Amazing Pics, Praveen 08
• Real meaning of addresses, tfelb
  • Re: Real meaning of addresses, pete
    • Re: Real meaning of addresses, tfelb
      • Re: Real meaning of addresses, tfelb
• Very Cute And Very Sexy Blonde Stripping, Sexy18
• Re: pointer questions, tfelb
  • Re: pointer questions, Chris Dollin
• carriage return and fprintf, Rahul
  • Re: carriage return and fprintf, Alexander Dolgarev
    • Re: carriage return and fprintf, Rahul
      • Re: carriage return and fprintf, Alexander Dolgarev
  • Re: carriage return and fprintf, pete
  • Re: carriage return and fprintf, James Kuyper
    • Re: carriage return and fprintf, Rahul
      • Re: carriage return and fprintf, Ben Bacarisse
• cypher, Bill Cunningham
  • Re: cypher, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: cypher, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: cypher, Ian Collins
      • Re: cypher, Keith Thompson
  • Re: cypher, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: cypher, Jujitsu Lizard
  • Re: cypher, Richard Tobin
    • Re: cypher, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: cypher, Richard Tobin
  • Re: cypher, Phil Carmody
  • Re: cypher, Hyuga
  • Re: cypher, vippstar
    • Re: cypher, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cypher, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: cypher, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: cypher, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: cypher, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cypher, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: cypher, blargg
  • Re: cypher, CBFalconer
• integer and floating point casts queries, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, John Bode
    • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, jameskuyper
    • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, CBFalconer
  • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Jack Klein
    • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, James Kuyper
      • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, pete
      • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Keith Thompson
      • Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Kenny McCormack
• Duplicate code, c . prog . fan
  • Re: Duplicate code, James Kuyper
    • Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan
      • Re: Duplicate code, jameskuyper
      • Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan
      • Re: Duplicate code, jameskuyper
      • Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan
      • Re: Duplicate code, James Kuyper
      • Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan
      • Re: Duplicate code, James Kuyper
      • Re: Duplicate code, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: Duplicate code, maverik
    • Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan
  • Re: Duplicate code, Bartc
    • Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan
  • Re: Duplicate code, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan
      • Re: Duplicate code, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan
      • Re: Duplicate code, jameskuyper
      • Re: Duplicate code, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan
      • Re: Duplicate code, nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, vippstar
  • Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, Jack Klein
    • Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, vippstar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, Old Wolf
  • Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, christian.bau
  • Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, CBFalconer
  • Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, Gordon Burditt
• SETP-09 call for papers,, john
  • Re: SETP-09 call for papers,, Kenny McCormack
• Help, poonkodi
  • Re: Help, vippstar
  • Re: Help, Jujitsu Lizard
  • Re: Help, Flash Gordon
    • Re: Help, CBFalconer
  • Re: Help, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: Help, vippstar
      • Re: Help, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Help, vippstar
      • Re: Help, Flash Gordon
    • Re: Help, James Kuyper
      • Re: Help, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Help, James Kuyper
      • Re: Help, nick_keighley_nospam
• Why this strange behaviour?, mattia
  • Re: Why this strange behaviour?, mattia
    • Re: Why this strange behaviour?, blargg
  • Re: Why this strange behaviour?, Barry Schwarz
• C99's variadic macros., João Jerónimo
  • Re: C99's variadic macros., João Jerónimo
  • Re: C99's variadic macros., Nate Eldredge
    • Re: C99's variadic macros., Laurent Deniau
  • Re: C99's variadic macros., Ben Pfaff
  • Re: C99's variadic macros., Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: C99's variadic macros., SozzlyJoe
    • Re: C99's variadic macros., João Jerónimo
      • Re: C99's variadic macros., Ben Bacarisse
• static cons v/s cons, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: static cons v/s cons, Zero
  • Re: static cons v/s cons, Flash Gordon
  • Re: static cons v/s cons, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: static cons v/s cons, blargg
  • Re: static cons v/s cons, litchie
    • Re: static cons v/s cons, James Kuyper
• bitwise operator !!, chang
  • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
  • Message not available
    • Re: bitwise operator !!, chang
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Willem
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, chang
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Bartc
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard
  • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
    • Re: bitwise operator !!, Bartc
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, James Kuyper
  • Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: bitwise operator !!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, David Thompson
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Richard Tobin
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, James Kuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, James Kuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Flash Gordon
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Flash Gordon
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Flash Gordon
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, lawrence . jones
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Phil Carmody
    • Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Flash Gordon
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, Ian Collins
      • Re: bitwise operator !!, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: bitwise operator !!, pete
    • Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson
• Array of pointer,multiple object and struct question?, Eric
  • Re: Array of pointer,multiple object and struct question?, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: Array of pointer,multiple object and struct question?, Eric
      • Re: Array of pointer,multiple object and struct question?, Ben Bacarisse
• making bytes out of bits, George
  • Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: making bytes out of bits, George
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, George
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, George
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Triple-DES
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Keith Thompson
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, George
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Keith Thompson
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Joe Wright
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, George
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, George
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Keith Thompson
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Azazel
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Keith Thompson
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Phil Carmody
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Phil Carmody
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, jameskuyper
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, George
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, George
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, David Thompson
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, David Thompson
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, George
  • Re: making bytes out of bits, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: making bytes out of bits, pete
      • Re: making bytes out of bits, Ben Bacarisse
• reading a structure with pointer, romesh
  • Re: reading a structure with pointer, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: reading a structure with pointer, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: reading a structure with pointer, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: reading a structure with pointer, Mark L Pappin
      • Re: reading a structure with pointer, nick_keighley_nospam
• job wanted for good C/c++ programmer, amolaggarwal
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats
  • Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats
• How to declare extern typedef struct?, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: How to declare extern typedef struct?, Richard Tobin
    • Re: How to declare extern typedef struct?, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: How to declare extern typedef struct?, CBFalconer
    • Re: How to declare extern typedef struct?, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
• Portable way of testing if a function exist, mathieu
  • Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, nicolas . sitbon
  • Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, mathieu
      • Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, David Thompson
    • Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, David Thompson
• fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Zero
  • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Richard Tobin
    • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Zero
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, viza
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla
  • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, George
  • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, blargg
    • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, CBFalconer
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Bartc
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Bartc
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, James Kuyper
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Joe Wright
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, James Kuyper
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, David Thompson
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Joe Wright
• tokens concat, c . prog . fan
  • Re: tokens concat, viza
    • Re: tokens concat, c . prog . fan
  • Re: tokens concat, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla
    • Re: tokens concat, c . prog . fan
      • Re: tokens concat, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla
      • Re: tokens concat, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: tokens concat, c . prog . fan
    • Re: tokens concat, Eric Sosman
• token concat, atorrses
  • Re: token concat, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: token concat, Thad Smith
    • Re: token concat, c . prog . fan
• dynamically allocate array size using malloc, SAUHING LEE
  • Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, vippstar
    • Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, vippstar
  • Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, Richard Tobin
  • Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, Keith Thompson
    • Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, Phil Carmody
• strtok problem, rayw
  • Re: strtok problem, rayw
  • Re: strtok problem, Zero
  • Re: strtok problem, Zero
  • Re: strtok problem, Thad Smith
• fclose failure conditions, manu
  • Re: fclose failure conditions, ais523
    • Re: fclose failure conditions, James Kuyper
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Bartc
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, jameskuyper
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Tobin
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, James Kuyper
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Tobin
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Eric Sosman
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, vippstar
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, CBFalconer
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, jameskuyper
  • Re: fclose failure conditions, vippstar
  • Re: fclose failure conditions, viza
    • Re: fclose failure conditions, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: fclose failure conditions, CBFalconer
    • Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Tobin
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Ian Collins
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, James Kuyper
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Tobin
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Ian Collins
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, CBFalconer
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Phil Carmody
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Bartc
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Tobin
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, CBFalconer
      • Re: fclose failure conditions, Antoninus Twink
    • Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Heathfield
• cast to 'void *', Mark
  • Re: cast to 'void *', Rolf Magnus
    • Re: cast to 'void *', blargg
      • Re: cast to 'void *', Harald van Dijk
      • Re: cast to 'void *', blargg
      • Re: cast to 'void *', Keith Thompson
      • Re: cast to 'void *', nicolas . sitbon
      • Re: cast to 'void *', Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: cast to 'void *', Keith Thompson
  • Re: cast to 'void *', Richard Heathfield
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • cast to 'void *', Borked Pseudo Mailed
    • Re: cast to 'void *', Ian Collins
    • Re: cast to 'void *', Mark
      • Re: cast to 'void *', James Kuyper
  • cast to 'void *', George Orwell
  • cast to 'void *', Anonymous
• Create multiple tree after calling self defined struct variable, SAUHING LEE
  • Re: Create multiple tree after calling self defined struct variable, nick_keighley_nospam
• Directory reading, mattia
  • Re: Directory reading, vippstar
    • Re: Directory reading, mattia
    • Re: Directory reading, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Directory reading, mattia
      • Re: Directory reading, Default User
      • Re: Directory reading, Chris McDonald
      • Re: Directory reading, Default User
      • Re: Directory reading, James Kuyper
      • Re: Directory reading, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Directory reading, Chris McDonald
      • Re: Directory reading, Default User
      • Re: Directory reading, Default User
      • Re: Directory reading, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Directory reading, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Directory reading, CBFalconer
      • Re: Directory reading, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Directory reading, David Thompson
      • Re: Directory reading, James Kuyper
      • Re: Directory reading, viza
  • Re: Directory reading, Ian Collins
    • Re: Directory reading, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Directory reading, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Directory reading, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Directory reading, Ian Collins
      • Re: Directory reading, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Directory reading, user923005
  • Re: Directory reading, thomas . mertes
    • Re: Directory reading, CBFalconer
      • Re: Directory reading, Ian Collins
      • Re: Directory reading, thomas . mertes
      • Re: Directory reading, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla
  • Re: Directory reading, mattia
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Directory reading, George Orwell
  • Directory reading, Nomen Nescio
  • Directory reading, Borked Pseudo Mailed
• C - malloc and user input, srikar2097
  • Re: C - malloc and user input, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
    • Re: C - malloc and user input, vippstar
      • Re: C - malloc and user input, nicolas . sitbon
      • Re: C - malloc and user input, CBFalconer
      • Re: C - malloc and user input, Keith Thompson
    • Re: C - malloc and user input, Flash Gordon
    • Re: C - malloc and user input, nicolas . sitbon
      • Re: C - malloc and user input, CBFalconer
      • Re: C - malloc and user input, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: C - malloc and user input, Keith Thompson
  • Re: C - malloc and user input, jameskuyper
  • Re: C - malloc and user input, Eric Sosman
• Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type (proper), Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type (proper), Ian Collins
  • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type (proper), christian.bau
• Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
  • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, jameskuyper
  • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, dj3vande
  • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, John Bode
    • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Walter Banks
  • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, CBFalconer
    • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, litchie
      • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, jameskuyper
      • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, litchie
      • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, James Kuyper
      • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, litchie
      • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, CBFalconer
      • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Harald van Dijk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Borked Pseudo Mailed
    • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Bartc
• Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, Richard Tobin
  • Message not available
    • Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, Eric Sosman
  • Message not available
    • Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, jameskuyper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • How to find out the weird character in the code, Anonymous
    • Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, jacob navia
    • Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, Keith Thompson
  • How to find out the weird character in the code, Nomen Nescio
  • Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, John Bode
  • How to find out the weird character in the code, George Orwell
• Array vs Vector, cnoe
  • Re: Array vs Vector, maverik
    • Re: Array vs Vector, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Array vs Vector, maverik
      • Re: Array vs Vector, cnoe
      • Re: Array vs Vector, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Array vs Vector, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Array vs Vector, James Harris
      • Re: Array vs Vector, maverik
      • Re: Array vs Vector, s0suk3
      • Re: Array vs Vector, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Array vs Vector, CBFalconer
      • Re: Array vs Vector, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Array vs Vector, CBFalconer
      • Re: Array vs Vector, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Array vs Vector, jameskuyper
      • Re: Array vs Vector, James Harris
      • Re: Array vs Vector, Phil Carmody
    • Re: Array vs Vector, maverik
  • Re: Array vs Vector, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Array vs Vector, viza
      • Re: Array vs Vector, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Array vs Vector, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Array vs Vector, maverik
      • Re: Array vs Vector, maverik
      • Re: Array vs Vector, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Array vs Vector, CBFalconer
      • Re: Array vs Vector, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Array vs Vector, James Harris
      • Re: Array vs Vector, viza
      • Re: Array vs Vector, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Array vs Vector, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Array vs Vector, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Array vs Vector, James Harris
  • Re: Array vs Vector, James Kuyper
  • Re: Array vs Vector, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Array vs Vector, James Kuyper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Array vs Vector, Anonymous
• some queries, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: some queries, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: some queries, Chris Dollin
      • Re: some queries, Keith Thompson
      • Re: some queries, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: some queries, viza
      • Re: some queries, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: some queries, Phil Carmody
      • Re: some queries, Bartc
      • Re: some queries, Phil Carmody
  • Re: some queries, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: some queries, James Kuyper
    • Re: some queries, James Kuyper
      • Re: some queries, Keith Thompson
  • Re: some queries, Barry Schwarz
• Is this some kind of hack, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is this some kind of hack, viza
  • Re: Is this some kind of hack, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: Is this some kind of hack, James Kuyper
  • Re: Is this some kind of hack, Keith Thompson
• reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski
  • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, viza
    • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski
      • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, viza
  • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski
      • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski
      • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Phil Carmody
      • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski
      • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, user923005
      • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski
      • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, David Thompson
• Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center
  • Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center
  • Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center
  • Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center
  • Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center
  • Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center
  • Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center
  • Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center
  • Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center
  • Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center
• Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, litchie
  • Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, James Kuyper
  • Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, John Bode
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Borked Pseudo Mailed
    • Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Richard Heathfield
  • (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, George Orwell
  • (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Anonymous
  • (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, George Orwell
    • Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Antoninus Twink
  • (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Borked Pseudo Mailed
• Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Tim Rentsch
  • Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Richard Tobin
    • Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Richard Tobin
      • [OT] Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Richard Tobin
      • [OT] Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Tim Rentsch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Borked Pseudo Mailed
• Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch
  • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk
    • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch
    • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Kaz Kylheku
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch
    • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., lawrence . jones
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., lawrence . jones
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch
• Ideal girl dance WEBCAM ! Ideal boobs !, lolekk1223@xxxxx
• OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN AND WORK WITH CMMI LEVEL5 COMPANY CATALYTIC SOFTWARE, catalyticregister@xxxxxxxxx
• writing uint16_t in a buffer, Alessio Sangalli
  • Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, Bartc
  • Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, blargg
  • Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, Willem
    • Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, litchie
      • Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, Flash Gordon
      • Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, blargg
      • Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, litchie
      • Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, Chris Dollin
  • Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, Thad Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • writing uint16_t in a buffer, Nomen Nescio
  • writing uint16_t in a buffer, Anonymous
• Re: Architecture design, Alessio Sangalli
  • Re: Architecture design, Nick Keighley
    • Re: Architecture design, Flash Gordon
• what kind of function arguments iis this ??, Sumit
  • Re: what kind of function arguments iis this ??, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: what kind of function arguments iis this ??, Jujitsu Lizard
  • Re: what kind of function arguments iis this ??, pete
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • what kind of function arguments iis this ??, George Orwell
    • Re: what kind of function arguments iis this ??, Nick Keighley
  • what kind of function arguments iis this ??, George Orwell
• learning C without an IDE, Jason
  • Re: learning C without an IDE, user923005
  • Re: learning C without an IDE, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: learning C without an IDE, darren
      • Re: learning C without an IDE, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: learning C without an IDE, Nick Keighley
      • Re: learning C without an IDE, Flash Gordon
      • Re: learning C without an IDE, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: learning C without an IDE, Flash Gordon
    • Re: learning C without an IDE, Ian Collins
  • Re: learning C without an IDE, santoshsy
  • Re: learning C without an IDE, Lorenzo Villari
    • Re: learning C without an IDE, Nick Keighley
      • Re: learning C without an IDE, Lorenzo Villari
  • Re: learning C without an IDE, Bartc
  • Re: learning C without an IDE, Tetsuya
  • Re: learning C without an IDE, Mara Guida
    • Re: learning C without an IDE, user1
  • Re: learning C without an IDE, J. J. Farrell
    • Re: learning C without an IDE, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: learning C without an IDE, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: learning C without an IDE, CBFalconer
    • Re: learning C without an IDE, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: learning C without an IDE, litchie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: learning C without an IDE, Peter Nilsson
• Re: *scanf in Harbison and Steele, George
• tree example, Bill Cunningham
  • Re: tree example, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: tree example, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: tree example, Bill Cunningham
  • Message not available
    • Re: tree example, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: tree example, Phil Carmody
• Re: QA-C gives side-effects warning. Unknown why, CBFalconer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • QA-C gives side-effects warning. Unknown why, Nomen Nescio
• Re: Searching for Link List Implementation (with requirements), user923005
  • Re: Searching for Link List Implementation (with requirements), Mark L Pappin
    • Re: Searching for Link List Implementation (with requirements), user923005
  • Re: Searching for Link List Implementation (with requirements), Chris Dollin
• Re: What is this?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: What is this?, Ben Bacarisse
• A question about void pointers, Richard Harter
  • Re: A question about void pointers, Eric Sosman
    • Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter
      • Re: A question about void pointers, Eric Sosman
      • Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter
      • Re: A question about void pointers, Eric Sosman
      • Re: A question about void pointers, jameskuyper
      • Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter
      • Re: A question about void pointers, CBFalconer
      • Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter
      • Re: A question about void pointers, CBFalconer
      • Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter
      • Re: A question about void pointers, James Kuyper
      • Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter
      • Re: A question about void pointers, David Thompson
      • Re: A question about void pointers, David Thompson
    • Re: A question about void pointers, Chad
      • Re: A question about void pointers, Chad
      • Re: A question about void pointers, Eric Sosman
  • Re: A question about void pointers, Jujitsu Lizard
  • Re: A question about void pointers, Jujitsu Lizard
• Re: volatile in C99, Kelsey Bjarnason
  • Re: volatile in C99, George
• void * and explicit cast, regis
  • Re: void * and explicit cast, maverik
  • Re: void * and explicit cast, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: void * and explicit cast, Richard Tobin
    • Re: void * and explicit cast, jameskuyper
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, pete
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, jameskuyper
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, pete
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, Richard Tobin
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, James Kuyper
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, James Kuyper
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, pete
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, Keith Thompson
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: void * and explicit cast, Tim Rentsch
    • Re: void * and explicit cast, pete
    • Re: void * and explicit cast, Jack Klein
  • Re: void * and explicit cast, jameskuyper
• Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, Walter Banks
  • Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, jameskuyper
    • Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, Walter Banks
      • Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, Nick Keighley
      • Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, jameskuyper
      • Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, blargg
  • Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, Richard Heathfield
• Compiler Warning, srikar2097
  • Re: Compiler Warning, Bartc
  • Re: Compiler Warning, vippstar
    • Re: Compiler Warning, srikar2097
      • Re: Compiler Warning, Nick Keighley
  • Re: Compiler Warning, s0suk3
    • Re: Compiler Warning, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Compiler Warning, s0suk3
      • Re: Compiler Warning, Nick Keighley
    • Re: Compiler Warning, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Compiler Warning, s0suk3
      • Re: Compiler Warning, srikar2097
      • Re: Compiler Warning - TPA, Default User
  • Re: Compiler Warning, Keith Thompson
• Re: **p vs. p[][], David Thompson
• Re: slurping in binary data, Nate Eldredge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: slurping in binary data, James Kuyper
    • Re: slurping in binary data, Keith Thompson
  • Re: slurping in binary data, George
  • Re: slurping in binary data, George
    • Re: slurping in binary data, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: slurping in binary data, James Kuyper
      • Re: slurping in binary data, George
      • Re: slurping in binary data, Chad
      • Re: slurping in binary data, Chad
      • Re: slurping in binary data, George
      • Re: slurping in binary data, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: slurping in binary data, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: slurping in binary data, George
      • Re: slurping in binary data, James Kuyper
      • Re: slurping in binary data, Keith Thompson
      • Re: slurping in binary data, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: slurping in binary data, James Kuyper
      • Re: slurping in binary data, George
      • Re: slurping in binary data, William Pursell
      • Re: slurping in binary data, George
  • Re: slurping in binary data, George
    • Re: slurping in binary data, Keith Thompson
  • Re: slurping in binary data, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: slurping in binary data, Dik T. Winter
  • slurping in binary data, Nomen Nescio
• tree, Bill Cunningham
  • Re: tree, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: tree, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: tree, Ben Bacarisse
  • Message not available
    • Re: tree, Bill Cunningham
  • Re: tree, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: tree, Nick Keighley
    • Re: tree, Bill Cunningham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • tree, Borked Pseudo Mailed
  • tree, Bill Cunningham
    • Re: tree, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: tree, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: tree, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: tree, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: tree, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: tree, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: tree, David Thompson
      • Re: tree, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: tree, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: tree, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: tree, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: tree, nick_keighley_nospam
• get the time needed to process one function., George Orwell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: get the time needed to process one function., CBFalconer
  • get the time needed to process one function., Anonymous
    • Re: get the time needed to process one function., Barry Schwarz
  • get the time needed to process one function., Borked Pseudo Mailed
  • Re: get the time needed to process one function., MisterE
  • Re: get the time needed to process one function., pete
• Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, Ben Bacarisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, James Kuyper
    • Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, pete
• Re: Free() and size of the process, christian.bau
• Re: volatile Keyword Question, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: volatile Keyword Question, lawrence . jones
    • Re: volatile Keyword Question, George
  • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Eric Sosman
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Eric Sosman
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, blargg
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, CBFalconer
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Chris Dollin
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Flash Gordon
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Chris Dollin
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Richard Tobin
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Flash Gordon
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Thad Smith
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, blargg
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Richard Tobin
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch
    • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, CBFalconer
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, CBFalconer
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, CBFalconer
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Eric Sosman
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, CBFalconer
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Eric Sosman
    • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Thad Smith
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, George
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, George
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, George
  • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Thad Smith
    • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard
  • volatile Keyword Question, Borked Pseudo Mailed
  • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Richard Bos
    • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, lawrence . jones
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, lawrence . jones
      • Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch
  • volatile Keyword Question, Nomen Nescio
• Re: z error, Ben Bacarisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: z error, Tim Rentsch
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), CLC stats