comp.lang.c

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• CLICK AND enjoy money
  • From: jtsudharsanam@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Approximate integer square roots
  • From: pete
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: CLC stats
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Approximate integer square roots
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Help 2 Update old C-Routine
  • From: Richard
• Re: Constructing a scalar reference
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Constructing a scalar reference
  • From: sln
• PDPCLIB 1.00 released after 15 years
  • From: kerravon
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Why does this crash?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Earn money 1$ per click
  • From: shenky_17
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Need GATE pdf Books 4 Computer Science
  • From: think 4 rohit
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Gate Books 4 Computer Scirnce
  • From: think 4 rohit
• Project Topic On C
  • From: think 4 rohit
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Don Bruder
• Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Don Bruder
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• CHEAP SELL:nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jeans:$30,watch$60,FREE SHIPPING !
  • From: www.iofferkicks.com
• Re: Is my global part of BSS ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Check this out
  • From: frankknot678@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why does this crash?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Funny videos
  • From: frankknot678@xxxxxxxxx
• UGG Boots and Discount UGG Boots
  • From: lingerliu17
• Re: Why does this crash?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: user923005
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Is my global part of BSS ?
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Help 2 Update old C-Routine
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Why does this crash?
  • From: vippstar
• Why does this crash?
  • From: vippstar
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: user923005
• Forged articles - request for amnesty
  • From: Nomen Nescio
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Approximate integer square roots
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Approximate integer square roots
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Approximate integer square roots
  • From: Nelu
• Re: [ot]Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Approximate integer square roots
  • From: Fred
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Approximate integer square roots
  • From: Albert
• Re: [ot]Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: [ot]Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [META] Forgeries
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: pete
• Re: [ot]Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: [ot]Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: Keith Thompson
• [ot]Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: pete
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Don Bruder
• Re: free problem
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• free problem
  • From: Andres Steinhilber
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [META] Forgeries
  • From: Default User
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: RegisterClassEx not Unicode as it should be
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Consistent code formatting
  • From: Ian Pilcher
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: George Peter Staplin
• Re: Consistent code formatting
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: RegisterClassEx not Unicode as it should be
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: EnumWindows returning before it should?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: PostMessage waiting for response???
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Can anyone help me with this "if" condition please?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Consistent code formatting
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Consistent code formatting
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: chris.j.smith.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [META] Forgeries
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Consistent code formatting
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Rui Maciel
• A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: chris.j.smith.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Consistent code formatting
  • From: Horacius ReX
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Software Engineer
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Richard
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Is my global part of BSS ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: vippstar
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: vippstar
• Resources about program design in C
  • From: Albert
• Latest string of forgeries
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: Albert
• UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• [META] Forgeries
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: struct data offsets
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Is my global part of BSS ?
  • From: Francis Moreau
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Richard
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Help 2 Update old C-Routine
  • From: Chris Lupus
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Zach
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Zach
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: A->B += A->C[d]->B please help!!
  • From: rahul
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Eric Sosmon
• Re: RegisterClassEx not Unicode as it should be
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Keith Thompson
• RegisterClassEx not Unicode as it should be
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• EnumWindows returning before it should?
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• PostMessage waiting for response???
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Larry Gates
• Chanel Shoes and Discount Chanel shoes
  • From: lingerliu17
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: 'execl' query
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: George Peter Staplin
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Help 2 Update old C-Routine
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: 'execl' query
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Help 2 Update old C-Routine
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: Help 2 Update old C-Routine
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Default User
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: Bart
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Help 2 Update old C-Routine
  • From: Chris Lupus
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Bart
• Help 2 Update old C-Routine
  • From: Chris Lupus
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: 'execl' query
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: 'execl' query
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 'execl' query
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: A->B += A->C[d]->B please help!!
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: A->B += A->C[d]->B please help!!
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: CBFalconer
• [OT] Spam
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: 'execl' query
  • From: Andrew Smallshaw
• Re: 'execl' query
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: 'execl' query
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: struct data offsets
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• 'execl' query
  • From: Mike
• Re: Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Storing values that are too large for that data type
  • From: Albert
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: struct data offsets
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: struct data offsets
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: struct data offsets
  • From: Fred
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Nelu
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: A->B += A->C[d]->B please help!!
  • From: stephenwvickers
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Nelu
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Array reference without index inside a for() loop -- help!!
  • From: Bart
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: Bart
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: standards question
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• standards question
  • From: Steve Chow
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Welcome to my pc world
  • From: akshy
• Re: C conditional statement shorthand puzzle -- please help!!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: C conditional statement shorthand puzzle -- please help!!
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Array reference without index inside a for() loop -- help!!
  • From: rahul
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Array reference without index inside a for() loop -- help!!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Zach
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Larry Gates
• Funny Videos
  • From: mleczko
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Mark L Pappin
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Richard
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Richard
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Default User
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: child exit status query
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• child exit status query
  • From: Mike
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Warning about constness (I think)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 'fork' query
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: 'fork' query
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: 'waitpid' query
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: 'fork' query
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Mark L Pappin
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: jameskuyper
• 'fork' query
  • From: Mike
• Re: Warning about constness (I think)
  • From: Old Wolf
• 'waitpid' query
  • From: Mike
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Golden opportunity
  • From: Deepika
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Harold Aptroot
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• dfg
  • From: natesanpriyait@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Bartc
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: forkazoo
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: pete
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: pete
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: pete
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: pete
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: pete
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Yevgen Muntyan
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• "Double Your Money In Under 30 Days"
  • From: Nickjr
• Funny videos
  • From: tomekwojciechowski88@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: portable printf of different size types
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: David Thompson
• portable printf of different size types
  • From: dacium
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Gary
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Bartc
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: user923005
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: AK_2009
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Bartc
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Andrew Smallshaw
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Gary
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Gary
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: pete
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: AK_2009
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: AK_2009
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Andrew Smallshaw
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: AK_2009
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Richard
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Richard
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: user923005
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Default User
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: user923005
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: user923005
• Re: Generic profilers?
  • From: ssylee
• Re: Generic profilers?
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Generic profilers?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Rafael
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Bartc
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Generic profilers?
  • From: ssylee
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: WINSCP for Linux
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• WINSCP for Linux
  • From: AK_2009
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Fred
• Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: syuga2012@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Richard
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Bartc
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: C conditional statement shorthand puzzle -- please help!!
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Software Engineer
  • From: ashley . wolfe
• Re: C conditional statement shorthand puzzle -- please help!!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Richard
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Richard
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Richard
• Re: Old program to generate skeleton of Finite State Machines
  • From: Aardalath
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: pete
• Re: Old program to generate skeleton of Finite State Machines
  • From: Aardalath
• Re: Old program to generate skeleton of Finite State Machines
  • From: Aardalath
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: pete
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Zach
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Andrew Smallshaw
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Richard
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: why is it dumping core?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Zach
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• validity of a pointer
  • From: sinbad
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Albert
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Nelu
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Set a position in file stream to be EOF?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: user923005
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Set a position in file stream to be EOF?
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Set a position in file stream to be EOF?
  • From: dacium
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Bartc
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: user923005
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Richard
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Gary
• Re: problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• problem incrementing my variable
  • From: Gary
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Richard
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Richard
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Make Money Now !!!
  • From: earn.money1online@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: why is it dumping core?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Bartc
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Meetings (Was: Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process)
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: why is it dumping core?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: why is it dumping core?
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard
• Re: why is it dumping core?
  • From: Richard
• Re: The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: stijnvandongen
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Richard
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: vippstar
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: vippstar
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: Remo D.
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Understanding ForEach() loop with 3 parameters -- please help!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Richard
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Richard
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Richard
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Albert
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Albert
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: santosh
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Albert
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare,MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Nelu
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Ian Collins
• Typedef-ing structs
  • From: Albert
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Albert
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Kai-Uwe Bux
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: vippstar
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: vippstar
• Re: [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: vippstar
• [OT] The nature of theft, was: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Albert
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: why is it dumping core?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Albert
• How to be a fake killfiler on comp.lang.c
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: dannyx . payton
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: No longer belongs to this program, but it still prints it - Strange
  • From: Richard
• Re: No longer belongs to this program, but it still prints it - Strange
  • From: Default User
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: jaysome
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Erik Trulsson
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Francis Moreau
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Francis Moreau
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: CLC stats
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: IOCTL to read a disk block
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Richard
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Richard
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: santosh
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Nelu
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: santosh
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: John Bode
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: malloc and alignment
  • From: vippstar
• malloc and alignment
  • From: Francis Moreau
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: portable and efficient signed bitfields
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Bartc
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Bartc
• Re: portable and efficient signed bitfields
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Type casting void *
  • From: MisterE
• Type casting void *
  • From: MisterE
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: RankWeis
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: MisterE
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: MisterE
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Albert
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: No longer belongs to this program, but it still prints it - Strange
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Kian Samii
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: pete
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Albert
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Rich Webb
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• not declaring something to equal null
  • From: Kian Samii
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Default User
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• infinite loop
  • From: kenny
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Why typecast to void when call a function with no return value
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: No longer belongs to this program, but it still prints it - Strange
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Tagore
• Re: Any differnece between functions
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Any differnece between functions
  • From: Tagore
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: No longer belongs to this program, but it still prints it - Strange
  • From: Victor Bazarov
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Default User
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Old program to generate skeleton of Finite State Machines
  • From: Dan Henry
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: John Doe
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: fmassei
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: John Bode
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Richard
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Richard
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Bartc
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: x=(r,s,t);
  • From: Willem
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Richard
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• x=(r,s,t);
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Richard
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Bartc
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: tfelb
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Hi all
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Richard
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Richard
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Richard
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Richard
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Richard
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Richard
• Re: lex
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• labour welfare
  • From: gopall.krishnan9@xxxxxxxxx
• lex
  • From: snigdha
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Chris H
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: tfelb
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: ssylee
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: about __llseek
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: ssylee
• about __llseek
  • From: keuntae . shin
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Hi all
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Why typecast to void when call a function with no return value
  • From: su
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Why typecast to void when call a function with no return value
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: String searching in a FILE*
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Why typecast to void when call a function with no return value
  • From: Ian Collins
• String searching in a FILE*
  • From: spasmous
• Why typecast to void when call a function with no return value
  • From: su
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: jellybean stonerfish
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Richard
• Re: Warning about constness (I think)
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Hi all
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: portable and efficient signed bitfields
  • From: Andrew Oakley
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: user923005
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Richard
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Richard
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Richard
• Re: printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: user923005
• Re: Fail-Safe C?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Warning about constness (I think)
  • From: CBFalconer
• printf on a very small floating point number
  • From: ssylee
• Re: Fail-Safe C?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Fail-Safe C?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: user923005
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: comparisons of floating point variables
  • From: user923005
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: user923005
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Default User
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Trap representations
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Hi all
  • From: John Bode
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: comparisons of floating point variables
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: struct problems
  • From: jameskuyper
• Trap representations
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: user923005
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Default User
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Hi all
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: isupper macro defined in ctype.h
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: portable and efficient signed bitfields
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: santosh
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Andrew Smallshaw
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Richard
• Re: isupper macro defined in ctype.h
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Richard
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Richard
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Default User
• Re: isupper macro defined in ctype.h
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: isupper macro defined in ctype.h
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Default User
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Kelsey Bjarnason
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Kelsey Bjarnason
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Kelsey Bjarnason
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• isupper macro defined in ctype.h
  • From: Tagore
• Re: comparisons of floating point variables
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: comparisons of floating point variables
  • From: Andrew Oakley
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Warning about constness (I think)
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Warning about constness (I think)
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: tfelb
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Richard
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• portable and efficient signed bitfields
  • From: Andrew Oakley
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Nelu
• Re: comparisons of floating point variables
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: joshuajnoble
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: comparisons of floating point variables
  • From: pete
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: tfelb
• comparisons of floating point variables
  • From: Tagore
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Hi all
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Warning about constness (I think)
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: James Kuyper
• Warning about constness (I think)
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: tfelb
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: tfelb
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: [OT] Hi all
  • From: Curtis Dyer
• Fail-Safe C?
  • From: Zach
• Re: [OT] Hi all
  • From: The Hippy
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: [OT] Hi all
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: [OT] Hi all
  • From: The Hippy
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Markus Litz
• Re: [OT] Hi all
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• [OT] Hi all
  • From: The Hippy
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Bitwise 2k9
  • From: bitwise2k9@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ? and :
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Bitwise 2k9
  • From: bitwise2k9@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Nelu
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: ? and :
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: ? and :
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: ? and :
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: ? and :
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Zach
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Zach
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Zach
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: CBFalconer
• ? and :
  • From: Zach
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: printf query
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: printf query
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: CBFalconer
• Forged articles
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: user923005
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Default User
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [OT] Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Default User
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Default User
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Default User
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• [OT] Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Default User
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• newsgroup conflict?
  • From: Zach
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: user923005
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Default User
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Zach
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: user923005
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: user923005
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Andrew Smallshaw
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Andrew Smallshaw
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• [OT] Iteration vs Recusion (Was Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal)
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: printf query
  • From: Tagore
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Richard
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard
• Re: printf query
  • From: santosh
• Re: printf query
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: printf query
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: printf query
  • From: Tagore
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: printf query
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: printf query
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Nelu
• printf query
  • From: Tagore
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• [OT] Cryptographic signatures
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Default User
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Default User
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Default User
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: santosh
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Rafael
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: struct problems
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: struct problems
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Eps
• Re: struct problems
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: struct problems
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: struct problems
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Richard
• Plattform independent basename function
  • From: Markus Litz
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard
• Re: Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Rafael
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Chad
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Bartc
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: James Kuyper
• Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 4)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 2)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 3)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Heathfield really, really has a killfile! (round 1)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re:
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Zach
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: santosh
• if (pointer) ?
  • From: Zach
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Zach
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: hi
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• ed hardy Jeans -fashionable
  • From: tanlanda
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: hi
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: hi
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: hi
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: hi
  • From: Rafael
• Re: "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: DSF
• hi
  • From: sarahholmes
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: [OT] Pronunciation
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Default User
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: user923005
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Tony
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Default User
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Callbacks and FFI Techniques
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Callbacks and FFI Techniques
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Default User
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: user923005
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Krypto
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Suggestions on improving program on binary tree postorder traversal
  • From: Krypto
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Rafael
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: struct problems
  • From: John Bode
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: struct problems
  • From: John Bode
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: santosh
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: struct problems
  • From: santosh
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Richard
• Re: struct problems
  • From: John Bode
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Default User
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: tfelb
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Richard
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: When it will be freed?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Rafael
• When it will be freed?
  • From: tfelb
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Richard
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Maciej Piechotka
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Eps
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: struct problems
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Richard
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: bert
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: James Kuyper
• GREATWAY TO EARN OVER $2000 P/M FROM ONLINE PARTTIME JOB
  • From: alanstretch
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Bartc
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Eps
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Chris H
• Re: struct problems
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: struct problems
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: struct problems
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: struct problems
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: struct problems
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• passing a dynamic number of strings to a function
  • From: Eps
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Richard
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Chris H
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Chris H
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: user923005
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: user923005
• Topicality - Are we missing the point?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Pronunciation
  • From: Albert
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• [OT] Pronunciation
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Gucci 111 Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches76
• Jaeger LeCoultre Reverso Gran Sport Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches76
• Fashion Blancpain Watches
  • From: iwcwatches76
• IWC Portofino Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches76
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Getting nanoseconds in a process
  • From: A. Marin
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Hans Schneider
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Richard
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: user923005
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Richard
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Albert
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: struct problems
  • From: Daniel Molina Wegener
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Richard
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: lawrence . jones
• struct problems
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Default User
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Richard
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Richard
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Rafael
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Julienne Walker
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Rafael
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Maciej Piechotka
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: blargg
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Maciej Piechotka
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: blargg
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: blargg
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Doug Harrison [MVP]
• Re: Old program to generate skeleton of Finite State Machines
  • From: Lorenzo Villari
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Old program to generate skeleton of Finite State Machines
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Richard
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Old program to generate skeleton of Finite State Machines
  • From: Aardalath
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Maciej Piechotka
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: mohi
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Maciej Piechotka
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: sscanf question
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: William Pursell
• Jaeger LeCoultre Reserve de Marche Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: bagsbags35
• Best Popular Watches
  • From: bagsbags35
• Maurice Lacroix Masterpiece Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: bagsbags35
• Audemars Piguet Charleston Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: bagsbags35
• Popular Gucci Watches
  • From: bagsbags35
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Bumbala
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Rafael
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Richard
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Richard
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• comp.lang.c topicality guidelines (version 1.0)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: George
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Maciej Piechotka
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Bumbala
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• (part2) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: blargg
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: blargg
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Default User
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: Default User
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Reading stderr
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Reading stderr
  • From: Bumbala
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: Chad
• Re: sscanf question
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: sscanf question
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: blargg
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: The Ultimate guide for computer's enthusiasts
  • From: vippstar
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: blargg
• The Ultimate guide for computer's enthusiasts
  • From: Jrdman
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: Chad
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: santosh
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Mark Wooding
• [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations
  • From: Maciej Piechotka
• Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case letter (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: Chad
• I can't get the uppercase letter to convert to the lower case level (Please don't bait Han from China)
  • From: Chad
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: sscanf question
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: sscanf question
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: sscanf question
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: sscanf question
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: sscanf question
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: sscanf question
  • From: Zach
• sscanf question
  • From: Zach
• Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition
  • From: rkiesling
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: Sac
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: Default User
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: William Pursell
• Passing a two dimensional array to function
  • From: Sac
• Re: Very basic but dont know how to find the answer .. what's L" ??
  • From: blargg
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Very basic but dont know how to find the answer .. what's L" ??
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Very basic but dont know how to find the answer .. what's L" ??
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Very basic but dont know how to find the answer .. what's L" ??
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Very basic but dont know how to find the answer .. what's L" ??
  • From: hcchen (gmail)
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: OT: CBF's peeing in his cornflakes again (Was [as hard as thisis to believe!]: Order of passing of parameters?)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Albert
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Bartc
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: petertwocakes
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: petertwocakes
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: CLC stats
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Richard
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Lorenzo Villari
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• EARN 14,500$/- TO 19,000$/- PM @ HOME
  • From: sh.pappu
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: OT: CBF's peeing in his cornflakes again (Was [as hard as this is to believe!]: Order of passing of parameters?)
  • From: Golden California Girls
• cheap sell:nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50,(FREE SHIPPING)FROM WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM
  • From: www.iofferkicks.com
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Richard
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Richard
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Bartc
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Richard
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Richard
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: geo
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Bartc
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: OT: CBF's peeing in his cornflakes again (Was [as hard as this is to believe!]: Order of passing of parameters?)
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Liinear distribution of random numbers?
  • From: petertwocakes
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Callbacks and FFI Techniques
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Callbacks and FFI Techniques
  • From: George
• Re: شاركنا الحملة
  • From: Larry Gates
• sequence points and the execution model
  • From: George
• Re: Idea about trolls
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Callbacks and FFI Techniques
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Albert
• Callbacks and FFI Techniques
  • From: Aaron W . Hsu
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Albert
• Re: OT: CBF's peeing in his cornflakes again (Was [as hard as this is to believe!]: Order of passing of parameters?)
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: [OT] killfile
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Standard C Programming in visual studio
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: Standard C Programming in visual studio
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Q about passing data as a const array
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Standard C Programming in visual studio
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: blargg
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: John Bode
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Richard
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Richard
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Richard
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Q about passing data as a const array
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Standard C Programming in visual studio
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: kevindtimm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: Richard
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: [OT] killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: lawrence . jones
• [OT] killfile
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Default document viewer
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Fred
• Re: Default document viewer
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: kevindtimm@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Default document viewer
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Different ways
  • From: tfelb
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: blargg
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Richard
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Richard
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Richard
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Different ways
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Does memory copied with memcpy() match bit for bit?
  • From: thomas . mertes
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Does memory copied with memcpy() match bit for bit?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Unicode characters length (NOT size)
  • From: jonathanztaub@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Richard
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: constructing a binary tree given the inorder and postorder traversals
  • From: Santosh
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Different ways
  • From: tfelb
• Re: constructing a binary tree given the inorder and postorder traversals
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Richard
• Re: constructing a binary tree given the inorder and postorder traversals
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Moncler down jacket
  • From: fashiontrade2046
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• constructing a binary tree given the inorder and postorder traversals
  • From: Santosh
• Re: Different ways
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: vippstar
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Richard
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: Bartc
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Richard
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: blargg
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: blargg
• Question on strncmp / strnicmp use
  • From: C . J . Clegg
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: blargg
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• OT: CBF's peeing in his cornflakes again (Was [as hard as this is to believe!]: Order of passing of parameters?)
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: Possible C shorthand -- please help!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Standard C Programming in visual studio
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer
  • From: optical supercomputing
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: prg usin linkd list n files
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Bartc
• Different ways
  • From: tfelb
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Q about passing data as a const array
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Standard C Programming in visual studio
  • From: Daniel Molina Wegener
• Re: Standard C Programming in visual studio
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Q about passing data as a const array
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Standard C Programming in visual studio
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Standard C Programming in visual studio
  • From: MasterMind
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: MACRO QUERY-3
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: CBFalconer
• (part1) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Unicode characters length (NOT size)
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: If 'Han from China' wrote a C book
  • From: James Harris
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Unicode characters length (NOT size)
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Hitherto secret facts revealed about DS9K
  • From: Keith Thompson
• USE YOUR MIND للاذكياء فقط
  • From: earn.money1online@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: MACRO QUERY-3
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• katrina kaif & sania mirza fucking video &earn 12,500$
  • From: kareena
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Unicode characters length (NOT size)
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Hitherto secret facts revealed about DS9K
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: jameskuyper
• Hitherto secret facts revealed about DS9K
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C exam on select2perform
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: The DS9000 (was: memcpy() with unitialised memory)
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Albert
• Re: Unicode characters length (NOT size)
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Unicode characters length (NOT size)
  • From: jonathanztaub@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Unicode characters length (NOT size)
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Unicode characters length (NOT size)
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: CBFalconer
• using pre-processor to count bits in integer types...
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: CBFalconer
• The DS9000 (was: memcpy() with unitialised memory)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: C exam on select2perform
  • From: Krypto
• Re: Unicode characters length (NOT size)
  • From: jonathanztaub@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Unicode characters length (NOT size)
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Unicode characters length (NOT size)
  • From: jonathanztaub@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C exam on select2perform
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• C exam on select2perform
  • From: Krypto
• Re: I will appear in Jerusalem. I am a hero. I will tell you what is "Armageddon". I am Isaac Newton. I think that Chinese people like dogs. I will take the yellow with black people into concentration camps.
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: MACRO QUERY-3
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Q about passing data as a const array
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Idea about trolls
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Bartc
• MACRO QUERY-3
  • From: Tagore
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Richard
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Guillaume Dargaud
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Richard
• Re: Idea about trolls
  • From: Richard
• Re: Idea about trolls
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Does memory copied with memcpy() match bit for bit?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Does memory copied with memcpy() match bit for bit?
  • From: vippstar
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: copx
• Re: Idea about trolls
  • From: vippstar
• Does memory copied with memcpy() match bit for bit?
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Idea about trolls
  • From: Richard
• Re: Idea about trolls
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: Richard
• Re: Idea about trolls
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: copx
• Re: Default document viewer
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: David Resnick
• [META] News server that carries comp.lang.c
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: Default document viewer
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: prg usin linkd list n files
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Default document viewer
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Guillaume Dargaud
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard Tobin
• "C Unleashed" OCR PDF on RapidShare, MegaUpload, P2P, etc.
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Guillaume Dargaud
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: George
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: George
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Popular Vacheron Constantin Watches
  • From: hualibao346
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Q about passing data as a const array
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Idea about trolls
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: prg usin linkd list n files
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Q about passing data as a const array
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Idea about trolls
  • From: John Bode
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: CBFalconer
• [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Beginner help
  • From: user923005
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Beginner help
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: vippstar
• C programming music
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Bartc
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Beginner help
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Beginner help
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Beginner help
  • From: asadfag
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Beginner help
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: John Doe
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Tony
• Beginner help
  • From: asadfag
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Jalapeno
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: John Doe
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Richard
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Bartc
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Richard
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Arithmetic conversions and integer constants
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: Default document viewer
  • From: Richard
• Re: Default document viewer
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Default document viewer
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• vsprintf without vsnprintf
  • From: Guillaume Dargaud
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Laurent Deniau
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Richard
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Bartc
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: prg usin linkd list n files
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• prg usin linkd list n files
  • From: mittalkratika817@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Viewing the padded bytes
  • From: Richard
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Richard
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Moi
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Q about passing data as a const array
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Arithmetic conversions and integer constants
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Default document viewer
  • From: wizard
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Q about passing data as a const array
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: Qwertyioup
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Q about passing data as a const array
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: user923005
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: user923005
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: user923005
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: user923005
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: George
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: user923005
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: qarnos
• memcpy() with unitialised memory
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Arithmetic conversions and integer constants
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Arithmetic conversions and integer constants
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: strange code
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: large array?? how to avoid stack overflow?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: large array?? how to avoid stack overflow?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: large array?? how to avoid stack overflow?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: user923005
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Richard
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: large array?? how to avoid stack overflow?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: On forgeries and lying
  • From: copx
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: user923005
• On forgeries and lying
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: user923005
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Richard
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: user923005
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: user923005
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: How to Easily Make a Function Thread-Safe
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: blargg
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: double cast to int reliable?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Richard
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• double cast to int reliable?
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: large array?? how to avoid stack overflow?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: REH
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: pointer to function?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: =?windows-1256?B?UmU6IFVTRSBZT1VSIE1JTkQg4eHH0N/tx8Eg3d7Y?=
  • From: Keith Thompson
• pointer to function?
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: USE YOUR MIND للاذكياء فقط
  • From: Ed Prochak
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• USE YOUR MIND للاذكياء فقط
  • From: earn.money1online@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: user923005
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: large array?? how to avoid stack overflow?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: large array?? how to avoid stack overflow?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Free Download - Microsoft Windows 7 Beta
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: IBM XL C/C++ NOSTRICT_INDUCTION
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: large array?? how to avoid stack overflow?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: How to Easily Make a Function Thread-Safe
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: large array?? how to avoid stack overflow?
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Flash Gordon
• large array?? how to avoid stack overflow?
  • From: A.E lover
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: marc
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Fred
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: marc
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: [off topic]Strange Behaviour -- adding printf change the progra execution
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: marc
• Re: How to Easily Make a Function Thread-Safe
  • From: Richard
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: marc
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: marc
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: How to Easily Make a Function Thread-Safe
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: Big numbers
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Strange Behaviour -- adding printf change the progra execution
  • From: swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx
• Big numbers
  • From: marc
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: Arithmetic conversions and integer constants
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: Richard
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [off topic]Strange Behaviour -- adding printf change the progra execution
  • From: blargg
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: blargg
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: William Hughes
• [off topic]Strange Behaviour -- adding printf change the progra execution
  • From: raxit@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: blargg
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: blargg
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• nice shopping plaza
  • From: weofferbest1@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Arithmetic conversions and integer constants
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: tfelb
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: vippstar
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: vippstar
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: tfelb
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: Richard
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: tfelb
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: vippstar
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Richard
• Re: strange behaviour
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Arithmetic conversions and integer constants
  • From: James Kuyper
• strange behaviour
  • From: tfelb
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Lorenzo Villari
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Arithmetic conversions and integer constants
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Christof Warlich
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: reassigning pointers
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Arithmetic conversions and integer constants
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Richard
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
• Re: How to Easily Make a Function Thread-Safe
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: How to Easily Make a Function Thread-Safe
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: blargg
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Richard
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: copx
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Make Money Online
  • From: lizzy
• (part 10) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Richard
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: Andrey Tarasevich
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: inet_ntoa not returning correct values
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Richard
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Richard
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Richard
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: avishaih
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: avishaih
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Richard
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Stephan Beal
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: sveiki
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: inet_ntoa not returning correct values
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: inet_ntoa not returning correct values
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• inet_ntoa not returning correct values
  • From: satish . burnwal
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: blargg
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: blargg
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: Compound literals efficiency
  • From: Marcus Harnisch
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Richard
• Re: Bit fields Vs logical operators?
  • From: Marcus Harnisch
• Re: Optimization Level -O2 in gcc
  • From: felipemartinsss
• Re: Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: Richard
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Richard
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Richard
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Richard
• linux, named pipes (mkfifo) and a hanging application
  • From: avishaih
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Richard
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: woo
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Palestinians Under Attack
  • From: MIK
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• www,honestaaa.com wholesale ugg boot nike adidas puma prada bag clothing...
  • From: honest08
• Palestinians Under Attack
  • From: zz495613
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: copx
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: copx
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: aloha826@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Optimization Level -O2 in gcc
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: Insert char at string
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: CBFalconer
• inline doesn't work - what I am doing wrong?
  • From: copx
• Insert char at string
  • From: aloha826@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: C vs. C++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• C vs. C++
  • From: beggars . banquet
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Bart
• Re: Bug analysis
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: comp.lang.c: Why no subcategories?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: jacob navia
• People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: James Harris
• Re: People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Bug analysis
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• People's time being wasted by 'Han from China'
  • From: James Harris
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Stephan Beal
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Stephan Beal
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Ian Collins
• Looking for tips for portable printf() specifiers for signed ints of varying sizes
  • From: Stephan Beal
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: IBM XL C/C++ NOSTRICT_INDUCTION
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Bit fields Vs logical operators?
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Charles Richmond
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Christof Warlich
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Christof Warlich
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: hi
  • From: parmenides
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Assert and application
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Optimization Level -O2 in gcc
  • From: felipemartinsss
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Assert and application
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Optimization Level -O2 in gcc
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Optimization Level -O2 in gcc
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Assert and application
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Assert and application
  • From: Rafael
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Optimization Level -O2 in gcc
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Optimization Level -O2 in gcc
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Optimization Level -O2 in gcc
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: James Kuyper
• Optimization Level -O2 in gcc
  • From: felipemartinsss
• Re: Assert and application
  • From: vippstar
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Richard
• Assert and application
  • From: Rafael
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Magnus Brand
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Christof Warlich
• Re: Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• connecting alternative output stream to terminal
  • From: Christof Warlich
• Re: (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Advanced Technology
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Advanced Technology
  • From: rtlxgroups
• (part 9) More Schildt-like errors in Dicky Heathen's book
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• How to check for errors when inputting a number
  • From: Albert
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: qarnos
• Re: comp.lang.c: Why no subcategories?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient
  • From: Sac
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: comp.lang.c: Why no subcategories?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Magnus Brand
• Re: comp.lang.c: Why no subcategories?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: comp.lang.c: Why no subcategories?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: eddie
• Re: Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: what's the expected behavior for duplicate symbol
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: comp.lang.c: Why no subcategories?
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Need help with struct *** dirent ???
  • From: eddie
• Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: comp.lang.c: Why no subcategories?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: what's the expected behavior for duplicate symbol
  • From: SamL
• Re: what's the expected behavior for duplicate symbol
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Defning SIZE_MAX
  • From: ozbear
• Re: what's the expected behavior for duplicate symbol
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• what's the expected behavior for duplicate symbol
  • From: SamL
• Re: comp.lang.c: Why no subcategories?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: CLC stats
• Re: Bit fields Vs logical operators?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• comp.lang.c: Why no subcategories?
  • From: Tony
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Magnus Brand
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Memory layout in unions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Bit fields Vs logical operators?
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Needed features in upcoming standards
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Defning SIZE_MAX
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: forward declaration of a struct typedef
  • From: eliben
• lvalue and rvalue?
  • From: Zach
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: forward declaration of a struct typedef
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Daniel Molina Wegener
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Whgere can I find Factorial source code?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Memory layout in unions
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: Memory layout in unions
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Memory layout in unions
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: Memory layout in unions
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: Memory layout in unions
  • From: just . a . garbageman
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Whgere can I find Factorial source code?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Whgere can I find Factorial source code?
  • From: user923005
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Whgere can I find Factorial source code?
  • From: petertwocakes
• Re: Whgere can I find Factorial source code?
  • From: petertwocakes
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Memory layout in unions
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: just . a . garbageman
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: forward declaration of a struct typedef
  • From: eliben
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Default User
• Free Download - Microsoft Windows 7 Beta
  • From: GoodieMan
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Whgere can I find Factorial source code?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Tony
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: qarnos
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Defning SIZE_MAX
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Defning SIZE_MAX
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Defning SIZE_MAX
  • From: ozbear
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• IBM XL C/C++ NOSTRICT_INDUCTION
  • From: rCs
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Chad
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Default User
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Chad
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Chad
• Re: Whgere can I find Factorial source code?
  • From: user923005
• Re: An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Default User
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Chad
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Default User
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Default User
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: rockdale
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: forward declaration of a struct typedef
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Timers using hash tables
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: malloc and free?
  • From: MisterE
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• malloc and free?
  • From: rockdale
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• An overflow case that puzzles me
  • From: Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Default User
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Chad
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Whgere can I find Factorial source code?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: dj3vande
• invalid lvalue in assignment
  • From: Chad
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Whgere can I find Factorial source code?
  • From: user923005
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Whgere can I find Factorial source code?
  • From: petertwocakes
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Drew Lawson
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: forward declaration of a struct typedef
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Amandil
• Re: forward declaration of a struct typedef
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: forward declaration of a struct typedef
  • From: swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: forward declaration of a struct typedef
  • From: crisgoogle
• Re: log4c thread safe ?
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: forward declaration of a struct typedef
  • From: Fred
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Bartc
• forward declaration of a struct typedef
  • From: eliben
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Timers using hash tables
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: log4c thread safe ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• log4c thread safe ?
  • From: satish . burnwal
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Triple-DES
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: pointer Access violation
  • From: tfelb
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: s.dhilipkumar@xxxxxxxxx
• Timers using hash tables
  • From: Ananda Jayeshwara (Arut Selvan)
• Re: 12 Bit data inside 16 bit words: how to truncate blanking bits
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: pointer Access violation
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: Stephan Beal
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: 12 Bit data inside 16 bit words: how to truncate blanking bits
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Amandil
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: bitwise operator !!
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Amandil
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Amandil
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: Stephan Beal
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: vippstar
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Porting from POSIX (FILE*) API to file descriptors. What is the equivalent of...
  • From: Stephan Beal
• Re: MACRO QUERY-2
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: vippstar
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard
• Re: MACRO QUERY-2
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: MACRO QUERY-2
  • From: vippstar
• MACRO QUERY-2
  • From: Tagore
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: vippstar
• Re: 12 Bit data inside 16 bit words: how to truncate blanking bits
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Steffen Buehler
• Re: 12 Bit data inside 16 bit words: how to truncate blanking bits
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard
• Re: random int -> random float
  • From: copx
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Richard
• 12 Bit data inside 16 bit words: how to truncate blanking bits
  • From: johnny
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: What is C header file sys/cdefs.h used for?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: pointer Access violation
  • From: tfelb
• Re: pointer Access violation
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: random int -> random float
  • From: geo
• pointer Access violation
  • From: tfelb
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Richard
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard
• Re: bitwise operator !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: blargg
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: blargg
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: bitwise operator !!
  • From: blargg
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Assertions that give full function call stack
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Assertions that give full function call stack
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: How to get strcmp() to work with number strings?
  • From: MisterE
• Re: How to get strcmp() to work with number strings?
  • From: MisterE
• Re: assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• ....sell CHEAP NIKE SHOES AND JEANS,AND UGG BOOTS
  • From: nikeshoe.sda@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reducing the size of objects with realloc()
  • From: Jujitsu Lizard
• Re: assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: John Carter
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Assertions that give full function call stack
  • From: John Carter
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: pls help modify it
  • From: james
• Re: pls help modify it
  • From: james
• Re: pls help modify it
  • From: james
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Storing a pointer in an int?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: bitwise operator !!
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: bitwise operator !!
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: bitwise operator !!
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Richard
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: A question about pointer of array.
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Richard
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Richard
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Richard
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: void * and explicit cast
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: How to get strcmp() to work with number strings?
  • From: Steve555
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: pls help modify it
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: pls help modify it
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• [OT] Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How to get strcmp() to work with number strings?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Counting chars after fprintf on a terminal
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Michael Angelo Ravera
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Counting chars after fprintf on a terminal
  • From: Antonio Maschio
• Re: How to get strcmp() to work with number strings?
  • From: Steve555
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Rafael
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Oh! The people of all over the world!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Richard
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Writing a function to figure out if stack grows up or down
  • From: sacindia2000@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How to get strcmp() to work with number strings?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: How to get strcmp() to work with number strings?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: How to get strcmp() to work with number strings?
  • From: Willem
• Re: How to get strcmp() to work with number strings?
  • From: David Resnick
• How to get strcmp() to work with number strings?
  • From: Steve555
• Re: Counting chars after fprintf on a terminal
  • From: Rafael
• Counting chars after fprintf on a terminal
  • From: Antonio Maschio
• Re: pls help modify it
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: pls help modify it
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: pls help modify it
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: jacob navia
• pls help modify it
  • From: james
• Re: Something like assert() while define NDEBUG, but not abort()
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Oh! The people of all over the world!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: pete
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: satish . burnwal
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: pete
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Something like assert() while define NDEBUG, but not abort()
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Something like assert() while define NDEBUG, but not abort()
  • From: Alex Vinokur
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Jean-Marc Bourguet
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: user923005
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Willem
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Is stat function thread safe ?
  • From: satish . burnwal
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Triple-DES
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Triple-DES
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: random int -> random float
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: String Manipulation
  • From: blargg
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: saul . plonkerton
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: saul . plonkerton
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: DanielJohnson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: qarnos
• Re: strange code
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: strange code
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: strange code
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: OT: fun with typos (was Re: OT: My killfile)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Order of passing of parameters?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: strange code
  • From: jellybean stonerfish
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: JC
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Default User
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: JC
• Re: assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: filia&sofia
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: strange code
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Barry
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: filia&sofia
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Barry
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Eric Sosman
• OT: fun with typos (was Re: OT: My killfile)
  • From: Lowell Gilbert
• Re: strange code
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Reducing the size of objects with realloc()
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: strange code
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Pointers and constants
  • From: Default User
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: OT: Killfile nomenclature
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Reducing the size of objects with realloc()
  • From: Barry
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: String Manipulation
  • From: Default User
• Pointers and constants
  • From: filia&sofia
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: String Manipulation
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: random int -> random float
  • From: copx
• Re: Reducing the size of objects with realloc()
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Reducing the size of objects with realloc()
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Reducing the size of objects with realloc()
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: random int -> random float
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Reducing the size of objects with realloc()
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: String Manipulation
  • From: Richard
• Re: String Manipulation
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: String Manipulation
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Harter
• String Manipulation
  • From: aloha826@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: random int -> random float
  • From: copx
• Re: strange code
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Needed features in upcoming standards
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: strange code
  • From: vippstar
• Re: strange code
  • From: vippstar
• Re: strange code
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• strange code
  • From: Tagore
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: saul . plonkerton
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Bartc
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: JC
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: JC
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: JC
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: JC
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: JC
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: JC
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Chad
• Re: random int -> random float
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: random int -> random float
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: saul . plonkerton
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: pete
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Amandil
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Richard
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard
• Difficulty of passing char[] to function accepting unsigned char*
  • From: Triple-DES
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: random int -> random float
  • From: copx
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: saul . plonkerton
• Re: William Shakespeare information
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Error handling in C
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Error handling in C
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: random int -> random float
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• William Shakespeare information
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: random int -> random float
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• random int -> random float
  • From: copx
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: vippstar
• Re: assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: JC
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: vippstar
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: vippstar
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Les Harris
• Is this a Standard Portable C Program?
  • From: Citizen C
• Re: assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: John Carter
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Rich Webb
• Re: Error handling in C
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Bartc
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Bartc
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Doug Miller
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Default User
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Rick Dearman
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: saul . plonkerton
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Huibert Bol
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Meta: Filters was Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Forged articles
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: pete
• Forged articles
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Meta: Filters was Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: OT: Killfile nomenclature
  • From: Richard
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: dj3vande
• OT: Killfile nomenclature
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Error handling in C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• OT: Suggestions for your killfile
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Order of passing of parameters?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Richard Bos
• OT: More on my killfile
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Make Money zonline
  • From: lizzy
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Error handling in C
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Compound literals efficiency
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Error handling in C
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Compound literals efficiency
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Compound literals efficiency
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Compound literals efficiency
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Error handling in C
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Compound literals efficiency
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Compound literals efficiency
  • From: Marcus Harnisch
• Re: Error handling in C
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Order of passing of parameters?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Compound literals efficiency
  • From: Marcus Harnisch
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: John Bode
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Compound literals efficiency
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• MACRO QUERY
  • From: Tagore
• Re: Compound literals efficiency
  • From: blargg
• Re: Compound literals efficiency
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Richard
• Re: Hello and Seeking Members Interested in Global Energy Assessment
  • From: Richard
• Compound literals efficiency
  • From: Marcus Harnisch
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Hello and Seeking Members Interested in Global Energy Assessment
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: JC
• Re: assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: JC
• Re: Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Displaying enum symbol names in GDB
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Raising a Number doubt..?
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• assert (unsigned > 0)
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: pete
• Re: Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode fileopening
  • From: Default User
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Charles Richmond
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: Richard
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode fileopening
  • From: Richard
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: DanielJohnson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Rick Dearman
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Asynchronous i/o?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: DanielJohnson
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: OT: My killfile
  • From: Default User
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: JC
• Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode fileopening
  • From: Default User
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: DanielJohnson
• Re: Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: christian.bau
• Problem in printing string, created in another function.
  • From: DanielJohnson
• Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode fileopening
  • From: Richard
• Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode fileopening
  • From: Default User
• Re: My killfile
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Questions regarding specialized malloc()/free() replacements
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: J. F. Lemaire
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• OT: My killfile
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: alternative451
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Questions regarding specialized malloc()/free() replacements
  • From: blargg
• Re: Questions regarding specialized malloc()/free() replacements
  • From: blargg
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: fflush(stdin), scanf and a space
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Questions regarding specialized malloc()/free() replacements
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re:
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: alternative451
• Re: using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Questions regarding specialized malloc()/free() replacements
  • From: Stephan Beal
• Re: Questions regarding specialized malloc()/free() replacements
  • From: Stephan Beal
• Re: using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: alternative451
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Questions regarding specialized malloc()/free() replacements
  • From: blargg
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: pete
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Questions regarding specialized malloc()/free() replacements
  • From: Stephan Beal
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: blargg
• Re: Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: JC
• using gtk+ and pixbuf
  • From: alternative451
• Re: Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: blargg
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Asynchronous i/o?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Asynchronous i/o?
  • From: deostroll
• Re: SETP-09 call for papers
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: pete
• SETP-09 call for papers
  • From: john
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Eric
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Richard
• Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode fileopening
  • From: Richard
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode fileopening
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: The irony of my being a troll
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode fileopening
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: pete
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Thad Smith
• Re: Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Loading a variable with its maximum value
  • From: Eric
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: CLC stats
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Bartc
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: reading a config file
  • From: Richard
• Re: Financial libraries in C?
  • From: Richard
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Han
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Han
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Bartc
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Richard
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Bartc
• Re: A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Keith Thompson
• A bit of fun. A programming puzzle to be done in C.
  • From: Rick Dearman
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Graphing Convolution
  • From: viper-2
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Financial libraries in C?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;
  • From: Moi
• Re: C99 compiler
  • From: soscpd
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: C99 compiler
  • From: JC
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• C99 compiler
  • From: soscpd
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: pete
• Re: The irony of my being a troll
  • From: Luuk
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: blargg
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: blargg
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: JC
• Re: Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: blargg
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: JC
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Null terminated strings: bad or good?
  • From: Tony
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: Tony
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: user923005
• Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode file opening
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• The irony of my being a troll
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode file opening
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode file opening
  • From: Falcon Kirtaran
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: spinoza1111
• Re: Graphing Convolution
  • From: Default User
• Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: August Karlstrom
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: pete
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: CBFalconer/Chuck still trolling strong
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: JC
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: JC
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: pete
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: user923005
• [ot]Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: pete
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: user923005
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Radoslav Dorcik
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: pete
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: user923005
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: user923005
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Graphing Convolution
  • From: viper-2
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: user923005
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: JC
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: David Liang
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Incremental memory allocation
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: CBFalconer/Chuck still trolling strong
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: [ot]Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Graphing Convolution
  • From: CBFalconer
• Incremental memory allocation
  • From: David Liang
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: christian.bau
• [ot]Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: pete
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: JC
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: JC
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: JC
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: user923005
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: user923005
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: rembremading
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: rembremading
• Re: Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: JC
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: JC
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: JC
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: jameskuyper
• how to avoid mistaken integer comparisons
  • From: rembremading
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: jameskuyper
• [OT] Re: Error handling in C
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Spiro Trikaliotis
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bill Cox
• cheap wholesale jordan shoes and air force one
  • From: dd
• Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: pete
• Re: Graphing Convolution
  • From: viper-2
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: blargg
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: CBFalconer/Chuck still trolling strong
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: James Harris
• Win free DVD Player now
  • From: skumar
• Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: xyzzybill
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: JC
• Re: CBFalconer/Chuck still trolling strong
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: xyzzybill
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: JC
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: spinoza1111
• Re: CBFalconer/Chuck still trolling strong
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: CBFalconer/Chuck still trolling strong
  • From: JC
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: Anonymous
• CBFalconer/Chuck still trolling strong
  • From: George Orwell
• Heathfield's intellectual integrity
  • From: Borked Pseudo Mailed
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: blargg
• Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors"
  • From: spinoza1111
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: pete
• Re: Graphing Convolution
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: MisterE
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: MisterE
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Brian McManus
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: pete
• Re: elliminate 0s
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last month)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Graphing Convolution
  • From: viper-2
• Re: Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: __PaTeR
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: JC
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: JC
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: pete
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: elliminate 0s
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• elliminate 0s
  • From: Jrdman
• Re: Graphing Convolution
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Asynchronous i/o?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: Eric
• Re: Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: JC
• Strange strcmp() action?
  • From: Eric
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: JC
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Error handling in C
  • From: Tony
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: Tony
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: Tony
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Jon Harrop
• Re: Error handling in C
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Charles Richmond
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: Tony
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Error handling in C
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc()
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Tom
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Tom
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Willem
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Tomás Ó hÉilidhe
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;
  • From: matt
• Re: Call again a variadic function (... variable number of arguments) with same arguments that its variadic wrapper
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Zunes bug
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Zunes bug
  • From: jacob navia
• Han from China's comp.lang.c 2009 resolution
  • From: Nomen Nescio
• Re: node again..
  • From: Moi
• Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;
  • From: blargg
• Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: char is signed or unsigned?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: C language
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types
  • From: pete
• Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: pete
• Re: Defacto standard string library
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: pete
• Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types
  • From: pete
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last month)
  • From: CLC stats
• Re: generic linklist
  • From: blargg
• Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?
  • From: Tony