Re: Typedef-ing structs
- From: Golden California Girls <gldncagrls@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:43:35 GMT
CBFalconer wrote:
People who fail to understand this are misusing Usenet. I may be
hard to understand at times because I will make posts (like mine
above) that just point out the failing, and not the reasons for
that being a failing.
I think you should contact your news provider and determine why you are the last
person on the face of the planet that doesn't get all the posts. While they are
fixing it, read the references header line. Or perhaps you are just abusing
your news reader and telling it to delete headers to articles you have read
rather than marking them read. Or perhaps your plonk filters are set to delete
far too many articles.
Clearly it is just you complaining. And it is just you who gets taken to task
for not getting it. Rules of debugging being such, the problem must lie with you.
.
- References:
- Typedef-ing structs
- From: Albert
- Re: Typedef-ing structs
- From: Ian Collins
- Re: Typedef-ing structs
- From: Albert
- Re: Typedef-ing structs
- From: Nelu
- Re: Typedef-ing structs
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Typedef-ing structs
- From: Nelu
- Re: Typedef-ing structs
- From: CBFalconer
- Typedef-ing structs
- Prev by Date: Re: Typedef-ing structs
- Next by Date: Re: WINSCP for Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: Typedef-ing structs
- Next by thread: Re: Typedef-ing structs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
