comp.lang.c

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: header
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast"
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: CLC stats
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Strange !!
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard
• Re: Strange !!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Strange !!
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Allocating Memory And Strings
  • From: jfbode1029
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Luuk
• Re: Allocating Memory And Strings
  • From: Mike
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: the consiglieri
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Allocating Memory And Strings
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Allocating Memory And Strings
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Allocating Memory And Strings
  • From: pete
• Re: Allocating Memory And Strings
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Christian Audigier Women's T-Shirts
  • From: zhanglin099
• Re: Allocating Memory And Strings
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: James Kuyper
• Allocating Memory And Strings
  • From: Mike
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: pete
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: pete
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Passing by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Passing by reference
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Free C Compiler on Windows
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Passing by pointer
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Passing by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Passing by pointer
  • From: Han from China
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: Kojak
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: can we initialize a function argument in c
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Han from China
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: can we initialize a function argument in c
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Passing by pointer
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Qsort-ing structures
  • From: Albert
• Re: header
  • From: Richard
• Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast"
  • From: Richard
• Re: header
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Richard
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: Richard
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Richard
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: the consiglieri
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: the consiglieri
• Re: Passing by reference
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: header
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Passing by reference
  • From: user923005
• Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast"
  • From: Larry Gates
• on all usenet
  • From: rio
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: can we initialize a function argument in c
  • From: pete
• can we initialize a function argument in c
  • From: harry
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: pete
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: pete
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: blargg
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Returning automatic pointers always bad?
  • From: C . J . Clegg
• Re: header
  • From: Richard
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: Han from China
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: henry
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Han from China
• header
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: GPS tracking software
  • From: Bubba
• Re: GPS tracking software
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: GPS tracking software
  • From: Bubba
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Han from China
• Re: pwd - C equivalent
  • From: user923005
• Re: GPS tracking software
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: C <--> FORTRAN, but without ISO_C_BINDING
  • From: user923005
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Richard
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: Richard
• GPS tracking software
  • From: Bubba
• Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C <--> FORTRAN, but without ISO_C_BINDING
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• C <--> FORTRAN, but without ISO_C_BINDING
  • From: Arjan
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Francogrex
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: user923005
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect
  • From: pete
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: maciek borzecki
• Re: C question
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: henry
• Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Richard
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: C question
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: pwd - C equivalent
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: jfbode1029
• Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: Kenneth Brody
• how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000
  • From: henry
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Kojak
• Re: [OT] Spam
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard Tobin
• [OT] Spam
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: C question
  • From: Kojak
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: blargg
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: blargg
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• [OT] Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Eric Sosman
• C question
  • From: GayCProgrammer
• Re: pwd - C equivalent
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: pwd - C equivalent
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: pwd - C equivalent
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: pwd - C equivalent
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: James Kuyper
• pwd - C equivalent
  • From: MN
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C
  • From: mireillen
• Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• implement default variable in C ?? is it possible
  • From: Tinku
• Re: serial port in C
  • From: Ian Collins
• serial port in C
  • From: the consiglieri
• Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: TonyMc
• Must a function pointer have a prototype in C
  • From: mireillen
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: How , system cpu and user cpu times calculates
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect
  • From: user923005
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect
  • From: vamsi
• Re: gets and puts warning
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• How , system cpu and user cpu times calculates
  • From: pavunkumar
• gets and puts warning
  • From: pavunkumar
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: user923005
• Difference between fgets and gets
  • From: pavunkumar
• Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect
  • From: user923005
• Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect
  • From: vamsi
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed
  • From: qarnos
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Nikos Chantziaras
• Re: test
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Ian Collins
• OT: Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Paul Hsieh
• Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed
  • From: Han from China
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Richard
• Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32
  • From: Robbo
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed
  • From: user923005
• Re: Clarification required for linkage.
  • From: Han from China
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: gw7rib
• Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed
  • From: Guilbert STABILO
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Ralf Damaschke
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32
  • From: Robbo
• Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32
  • From: Keith Thompson
• How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32
  • From: Robbo
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: pete
• Re: Clarification required for linkage.
  • From: pete
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Fred
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Boon
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!
  • From: Kojak
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: blargg
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: blargg
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Very simple: passing parameters
  • From: Francogrex
• Re: usage of fwide function
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• usage of fwide function
  • From: pavunkumar
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast"
  • From: Han from China
• Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast"
  • From: Han from China
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: TonyMc
• Re: Clarification required for linkage.
  • From: Han from China
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Kojak
• What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?
  • From: Mark Hobley
• Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast"
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast"
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Larry Gates
• Movado Medalist Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches255
• Tissot V8 Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches255
• Breguet Marine Automatic Big Date Mens Watch 5817ST.Y2.SVO, Best Wristwatch World
  • From: iwcwatches255
• Breitling Navitimer 18kt Yellow Gold Steel Black Mens Watch D2332212-B6-431D, Best Wristwatch World
  • From: iwcwatches255
• Rado Coupole Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches255
• Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: blargg
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Clarification required for linkage.
  • From: somenath
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Tony
• On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast"
  • From: Han from China
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Coogi Men's Jeans - discount
  • From: sxhhuangshuixian
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Jujitsu Lizard
• Re: C mnemonics
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Bartc
• Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Paul Hsieh
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: user923005
• Re: Interesting math problem
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Clarification required for linkage.
  • From: Han from China
• Interesting math problem
  • From: Nikos Chantziaras
• Re: Clarification required for linkage.
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Bartc
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Clarification required for linkage.
  • From: somenath
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated...
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: stijnvandongen
• ANNOUNCE: PL/compiler postdoctoral research position (closes 3/31/09)
  • From: smithmk
• Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety
  • From: Richard
• Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: printf output
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: stijnvandongen
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Richard
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: C mnemonics
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?]
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Bart van Ingen Schenau
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: MN
• Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: pete
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: stijnvandongen
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: blargg
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit
  • From: deepak . upp
• ATTN: Han Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit
  • From: deepak . upp
• Re: object & executable file
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: MN
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit
  • From: deepak . upp
• Fashion True Religion Men's t shirt - discount
  • From: maipump01
• Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety
  • From: Han from China
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety
  • From: Jujitsu Lizard
• geld verdienen durch online sein,drakensang geld machen,internet geld verdienen forum,viel geld verdienen,im internet verdienen durch,
  • From: datona753
• Re: What is the proper way to do recursion
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: object & executable file
  • From: jfbode1029
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Han from China
• Re: object & executable file
  • From: Han from China
• Re: [OT] Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: What is the proper way to do recursion
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: What is the proper way to do recursion
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Richard
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Richard
• What is the proper way to do recursion
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: object & executable file
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• On strictly conforming programs and the future of CLC
  • From: Han from China
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Han from China
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: rkiesling
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: stijnvandongen
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: teapot
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: object & executable file
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Bartc
• Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC
  • From: pete
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re:
  • From: Richard
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: stijnvandongen
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: sathya
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?
  • From: MN
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: object & executable file
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: explanation for exec functions
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• object & executable file
  • From: techgroups.bk@xxxxxxxxx
• explanation for exec functions
  • From: techgroups.bk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile
  • From: Larry Gates
• Fashion True Religion Womens t shirt - discount
  • From: sxhhuangshuixian
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re:
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Christian interested in a mature debate
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Christian interested in a mature debate
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: rkiesling
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC
  • From: Han from China
• Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC
  • From: pete
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: user923005
• Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC
  • From: Richard
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Richard
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Richard
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: blargg
• Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Default User
• Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: user923005
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Richard
• Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile
  • From: Richard
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Bartc
• Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: big mess
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Larry Gates
• On implementation limits and the future of CLC
  • From: Han from China
• Re: greedy algorithm
  • From: user923005
• Re: big mess
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: big mess
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: big mess
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Conclusive proof concerning CBFalconer's thread annoyances
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Stupid Echo
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Stupid Echo
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: rio
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• DOWNLOAD FREE ALL NOKIA MOBILE HANDSET,& iPHONE,LAPTOP,COMPUTER ALL ARE FREE.
  • From: RAJESH RANA
• [OT] Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: big mess
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: pete
• www.dudes-mall.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes.!
  • From: www.dudes-mall.com
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Bartc
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Bartc
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: blargg
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: greedy algorithm
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Jean-Marc Bourguet
• Rock And Republic Womens Jeans - fashion
  • From: sxhhuangshuixian
• Hogan shoes (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn )
  • From: fffffffffff
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Han from China
• greedy algorithm
  • From: Jung, William
• make online money
  • From: com bizz
• Make money online
  • From: com bizz
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: big mess
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: Han from China
• Re: big mess
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Mark L Pappin
• Re: big mess
  • From: Joe Wright
• Open Your Eyes To What’s REALLY Going On In The World!
  • From: asrock
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: big mess
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: big mess
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Conclusive proof concerning CBFalconer's thread annoyances
  • From: Han from China
• Re: strange result
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: big mess
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: teapot
• Re: big mess
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Han from China
• Re: big mess
  • From: Kojak
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• big mess
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: dlopen of several lib
  • From: Anthony Catel
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Han from China
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: dlopen of several lib
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: dlopen of several lib
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: blargg
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: hex to int
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• hex to int
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: dlopen of several lib
  • From: Anthony Catel
• Re: dlopen of several lib
  • From: Anthony Catel
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: dlopen of several lib
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Han from China
• dlopen of several lib
  • From: Anthony Catel
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Harald van $)CD)&k
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Richard
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: Richard
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Draft paper submission deadline extended: SETP-09
  • From: sr
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: pete
• Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: Tea Pot
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Tea Pot
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: pete
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Tea Pot
• Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Tea Pot
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: pete
• Questionnaire
  • From: pkuphenix
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: rio
• lcc-win is not <some compiler>
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?
  • From: vib.cpp@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Richard
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Richard
• Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>
  • From: teapot
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: teapot
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: solving a recursion
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Han from China
• FYI - Thompson's killfile
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: strange result
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: Han from China
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: CLC stats
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Han from China
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Richard
• Re:
  • From: Richard
• Re:
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Han from China
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: printf output
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: strange result
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: strange result
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: strange result
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: strange result
  • From: happytoday
• Re: strange result
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: solving a recursion
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: strange result
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: strange result
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Just a bit of silliness
  • From: Barry
• Re: strange result
  • From: Kojak
• strange result
  • From: happytoday
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: pete
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: solving a recursion
  • From: pete
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: printf output
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• solving a recursion
  • From: varun chadha
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?]
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?]
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Woodall
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?]
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?]
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• ed hardy men's underwear - fashionable
  • From: janetannjn
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Just a bit of silliness
  • From: The Hippy
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: pete
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: pete
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: pete
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Randy Howard
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Qsort-ing structures
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: user923005
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Han from China
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?]
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Han from China
• OT: Editor heritage [was: Re: C question]
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?]
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Han from China
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Han from China
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: printf output
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: C question
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: external variables
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Han from China
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: vaib
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Qsort-ing structures
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC
  • From: Han from China
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: printf output
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Han from China
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: printf output
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: user923005
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: C question
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Current world's smallest chess program
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: a[i++] = j
  • From: Fred
• Re: a[i++] = j
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: a[i++] = j
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: a[i++] = j
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: a[i++] = j
  • From: Kojak
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Kojak
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Han from China
• a[i++] = j
  • From: saurabh29789
• Re: On "type casting"
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: jfbode1029
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Erik Trulsson
• Re: Segmentation fault
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: logging optimization
  • From: Nelu
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: jameskuyper
• Segmentation fault
  • From: vaib
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Tom Impelluso
• wholesale cheap lacoste puma trainers, edhardy bbc lrg t-shirts & jeans
  • From: www.globwholesale.com
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Tips to earn more with no inverstment...
  • From: Sushmitha
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: #include vs. -library
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• #include vs. -library
  • From: Tom Impelluso
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: pete
• Re: logging optimization
  • From: lndresnick
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: pete
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: pete
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Compilers no longer release executables
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !
  • From: Boon
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: logging optimization
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: logging optimization
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• logging optimization
  • From: Neo
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Compilers no longer release executables
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Searching for history of "#if"
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• ed hardy men's shirts - fashionable
  • From: hclchanglinghuang
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Nelu
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: user923005
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Searching for history of "#if"
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: pete
• Re: rel strength index function
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: About space for variable
  • From: westbest98
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: pete
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Nelu
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: Brice Rebsamen
• rel strength index function
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: pete
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Bartc
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: On "type casting"
  • From: Han from China
• More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs"
  • From: Han from China
• Re: On "type casting"
  • From: blargg
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: On "type casting"
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Bartc
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
• Re: Compilers no longer release executables
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Bartc
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Han from China
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Richard
• Re: On "type casting"
  • From: Han from China
• Compilers no longer release executables
  • From: Clifford Stern
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Nelu
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Han from China
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: blargg
• Re: On "type casting"
  • From: blargg
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Han from China
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats
  • From: Tim Prince
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Richard
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Richard
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats
  • From: Bartc
• Re: About space for variable
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: "Referenced type "
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Ira Baxter
• Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats
  • From: rembremading
• "Referenced type "
  • From: saurabh29789
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Richard
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?
  • From: Hallvard B Furuseth
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: Han from China
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Richard
• Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats
  • From: Bartc
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Chris Dollin
• (WWW.STYLISHDUDES.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING)
  • From: www.stylishdudes.com
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Richard
• Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats
  • From: rembremading
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: pete
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Richard
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Richard
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Richard
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Andrew Smallshaw
• Re: About space for variable
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Kojak
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Bartc
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: Rajshekhar
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• any compiler that takes encrypted input
  • From: sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Han from China
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Bartc
• Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Tea Pot
• Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Hans Schneider
• Re: About space for variable
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: About space for variable
  • From: Kojak
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: About space for variable
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Qsort-ing structures
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Re: Searching for history of "#if"
  • From: Boon
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Han from China
• Qsort-ing structures
  • From: Albert
• Re: About space for variable
  • From: raashid bhatt
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: Rajshekhar
• About space for variable
  • From: westbest98
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: Rajshekhar
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: blargg
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: adding \ char to the string
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Kojak
• bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• adding \ char to the string
  • From: Rajshekhar
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: Brice Rebsamen
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: casting and arithmetic
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: printf output
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• casting and arithmetic
  • From: Brice Rebsamen
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Bartc
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Remebering the order of precedence
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Richard
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Tea Pot
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Han from China
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: C question
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Walter Banks
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: user923005
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Tea Pot
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Tea Pot
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: blargg
• On "type casting"
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: blargg
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: C mnemonics
  • From: Coos Haak
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• celebs
  • From: sonynamratha
• music maestro
  • From: sonynamratha
• voip and video conferencing
  • From: sonynamratha
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Searching for history of "#if"
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: C question
  • From: Richard
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: C question
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: printf output
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Bartc
• Re: printf output
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Richard
• Re: C question
  • From: Richard
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Richard
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Kojak
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Kojak
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Kojak
• Re: C question
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Kojak
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Han from China
• Re: C mnemonics
  • From: Han from China
• Re: C mnemonics
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: printf output
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Kojak
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Kojak
• Re: C mnemonics
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Searching for history of "#if"
  • From: Boon
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: MisterE
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Searching for history of "#if"
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: Kojak
• Logical operator not working in if condition
  • From: venkatarao0@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Paul Hsieh
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: external variables
  • From: pete
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: external variables
  • From: pete
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: C mnemonics
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: user923005
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: printf output
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: C question
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: user923005
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Bartc
• C mnemonics
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C question
  • From: user923005
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: user923005
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: C question
  • From: Ficus Elastica
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: user923005
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Bartc
• Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present
  • From: Tea Pot
• Re: Function Call - help
  • From: John Bode
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: printf output
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: printf output
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: JJ
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: printf output
  • From: Nelu
• Re: printf output
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: printf output
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: user923005
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Function Call - help
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: printf output
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: maciek borzecki
• How often do you read the C standard?
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: Function Call - help
  • From: Richard
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard
• Re: printf output
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: C question
  • From: blmblm
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Searching for history of "#if"
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: printf output
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Searching for history of "#if"
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: printf output
  • From: Keep Asking
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Function Call - help
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: printf output
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Function Call - help
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Richard
• Re: Function Call - help
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Function Call - help
  • From: libertinux
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Richard
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Richard
• Re: C question
  • From: Richard
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Han from China
• Re: C question
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: C question
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: external variables
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: printf output
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: C question
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Port Royal Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches114
• Popular Cartier Watches
  • From: iwcwatches114
• Vacheron Constantin Patrimony Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches114
• Best Stuhrling Watches World
  • From: iwcwatches114
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: printf output
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: reading socket data
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Golden California Girls
• reading socket data
  • From: nix
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: printf output
  • From: jaysome
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: user923005
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Richard
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Richard
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: C question
  • From: Richard
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Richard
• Re: printf output
  • From: Richard
• (part1b) Han from China teaches you C
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Han from China
• Re: printf output
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: user923005
• Re: printf output
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: printf output
  • From: Jack Klein
• printf output
  • From: Keep Asking
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: external variables
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Bartc
• Re: C question
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C question
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C question
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: user923005
• Re: C question
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: C question
  • From: Ficus Elastica
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: user923005
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: user923005
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Richard
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard
• Re: external variables
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: user923005
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Han from China
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: external variables
  • From: Han from China
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: user923005
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: JJ
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: blargg
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Han from China
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Han from China
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Bartc
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Richard
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Han from China
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: Richard
• "%d"+1 and printf !!
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: external variables
  • From: pete
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: external variables
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: skillzero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Han from China
• Re: external variables
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: external variables
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: external variables
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: external variables
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: external variables
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: HTTP RESPONSE query
  • From: Ram
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• ED Hardy sunglasses - sunglasses discount
  • From: jmsmark30
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Han from China
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Han from China
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: skillzero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• [Meta] Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: skillzero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: skillzero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer...
  • From: Jujitsu Lizard
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: skillzero@xxxxxxxxx
• Excuse me
  • From: ama
• Re: va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• va_list * and function parameters?
  • From: skillzero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Environmental Living! - Join The Green Revolution!
  • From: Sjouke Burry
• Re: ? :
  • From: pete
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: ? :
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Environmental Living! - Join The Green Revolution!
  • From: greenliving.cjb@xxxxxxxxx
• Environmental Living! - Join The Green Revolution!
  • From: greenliving.cjb@xxxxxxxxx
• Environmental Living! - Join The Green Revolution!
  • From: greenliving.cjb@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: ? :
  • From: Richard
• Re: ? :
  • From: pete
• Re: ? :
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: ? :
  • From: Ian Collins
• ? :
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: external variables
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Christian interested in a mature debate
  • From: stoney
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Bikini babes:_:_:_
  • From: coolbuddy
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: MACRO QUERY
  • From: pete
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: external variables
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: external variables
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: [OT] Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: C question
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• MACRO QUERY
  • From: Tagore
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: JJ
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: HTTP RESPONSE query
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: Han from China
• Re: HTTP RESPONSE query
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: mijoryx
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: passing reference to pointer
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• passing reference to pointer
  • From: softdeveloper007
• Re: HTTP RESPONSE query
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Never reinstall XP again
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Bikini babes:__::::
  • From: coolbuddy
• HTTP RESPONSE query
  • From: Ram
• Re: Freeing the allocated block
  • From: new
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: myforwik
• Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?
  • From: myforwik
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Never reinstall XP again
  • From: repairtool.vze@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?
  • From: Chad
• Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Can you traverse over an array contents in c?
  • From: Chad
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• good quality nike jordan shoes from china(www.cnnshoe.com)
  • From: wulee
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: blargg
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: candide
• Re: What does this code do?
  • From: Curtis Dyer
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: candide
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: JJ
• Re: [OT] Re: c to c++
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: CLC stats
• Re: Function returning a char
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Joachim Schmitz
• Re: Freeing the allocated block
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Suvroc
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Lorenzo Villari
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Ralf Damaschke
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Suvroc
• Function returning a char
  • From: candide
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Lorenzo Villari
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: Bartc
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Tony
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Switch for floating !!
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Switch for floating !!
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Richard Tobin
• ***************New Enthiran Stills Of Rajini & Aishwarya Rai****************
  • From: Enthian
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: external variables
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: JJ
• Re: [OT] Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: [OT] Re: c to c++
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Tony
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Tony
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• OT: editors [was Re: C question]
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Copy and paste in software development
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: Old Wolf
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: external variables
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: external variables
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: external variables
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: Ian Collins
• Free credit report - 2009 Best Offer!
  • From: ojbaconstartle
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Copy and paste in software development
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: external variables
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: external variables
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Copy and paste in software development
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: [OT] Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: [OT] Re: c to c++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Tick counting problem
  • From: Bartc
• advice/thoughts on garbage collection?
  • From: mijoryx
• Tick counting problem
  • From: JJ
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: pete
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: pete
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: external variables
  • From: pete
• Re: [OT] Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• [OT] Re: c to c++
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Why copy const char* argument?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Why copy const char* argument?
  • From: blargg
• Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0
  • From: blargg
• Easy ways of earning money online guide
  • From: success
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: blargg
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: mohi
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: external variables
  • From: Boon
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: Han from China
• Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0
  • From: Boon
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: blargg
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: blargg
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: blargg
• Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0
  • From: pete
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: external variables
  • From: pete
• What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: How to test if non-numeric macro tokens are the same
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: A little bit of C -> C# help required please!!
  • From: Harold Aptroot
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Han from China
• Re: A little bit of C -> C# help required please!!
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Bruce Cook
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: Steffen Buehler
• Re: external variables
  • From: Boon
• Re: C question
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• TRI TOO WIN
  • From: tom
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: Lorenzo Villari
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: pete
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: C question
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: pete
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Freeing the allocated block
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Freeing the allocated block
  • From: new
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: ugepp
• Re: How to test if non-numeric macro tokens are the same
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: external variables
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: Daniel Kraft
• Strange behaviour of while loop !!
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: What does this code do?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• How to test if non-numeric macro tokens are the same
  • From: James Tursa
• Re: Why copy const char* argument?
  • From: Tim Woodall
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: Roberto Divia
• Re: What does this code do?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Why copy const char* argument?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Books
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: What's wrong with this code?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Amazing Cool mobile application Absolutely FREE !!
  • From: Lima
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Han from China
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: DSF
• Re: Why copy const char* argument?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Books
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Initializing with OL
  • From: Han from China
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: Han from China
• Re: What does this code do?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• What does this code do?
  • From: keekeekee17
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Why copy const char* argument?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Problem with realloc (I think)
  • From: DSF
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: psych question about ignoring people
  • From: Borked Pseudo Mailed
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Harald van Dijk
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Han from China
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Why copy const char* argument?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Han from China
• Re: psych question about ignoring people
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: dynamic list of structures
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Books
  • From: Nelu
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Why copy const char* argument?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Books
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: Paul Hsieh
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: David Resnick
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: CBFalconer
• Gucci Continental Wallet Gold 112724 Collection
  • From: bagsbags31
• Gucci Princy Boston S Collection
  • From: bagsbags31
• Chanel Wallet Red C1509 Collection
  • From: bagsbags31
• Monogram Canvas Designed Purse M61717 Collection
  • From: bagsbags31
• Fendi Spring/Summer Black 2575 Collection
  • From: bagsbags31
• Miu Miu Handbag Earth Yellow 57511 Collection
  • From: bagsbags31
• Monogram Denim Camera Bag Collection
  • From: bagsbags31
• Chanel Handbags Black 25205 Collection
  • From: bagsbags31
• Re: Initializing with OL
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Books
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: dynamic list of structures
  • From: Bartc
• Re: Initializing with OL
  • From: pete
• Re: Books
  • From: Nelu
• Re: dynamic list of structures
  • From: pete
• Re: Initializing with OL
  • From: Keith Thompson
• dynamic list of structures
  • From: irwa82
• Re: Books
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: blargg
• Re: Initializing with OL
  • From: MisterE
• Re: psych question about ignoring people
  • From: marcia
• Re: psych question about ignoring people
  • From: marcia
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: user923005
• Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: user923005
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: C question
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: Willem
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: Nelu
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Tim Woodall
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: psych question about ignoring people
  • From: HoofPrints
• Suggestions about transparent data structures
  • From: stdazi@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: Dominik Friedrichs
• Re: test
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: pete
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: Dominik Friedrichs
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Why copy const char* argument?
  • From: pete
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: Nelu
• Re: oddness with strcpy
  • From: Dominik Friedrichs
• Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer...
  • From: Bartc
• oddness with strcpy
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Books
  • From: Richard
• Why copy const char* argument?
  • From: Dominik Friedrichs
• Re: C question
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Bartc
• Re: C question
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Books
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: C question
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Bruce Cook
• Re: Books
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: C question
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Books
  • From: Nelu
• Re: C question
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: C question
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Books
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Books
  • From: Nelu
• Re: C question
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: Boon
• Re: C question
  • From: Chris Dollin
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Books
  • From: Richard
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard
• Re: Books
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: somenath
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer...
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Typecast clarification
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer...
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Books
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: c to c++
  • From: James Kuyper
• Function for getting a serial number of computer...
  • From: djuro . tost
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Tim Woodall
• Re: Books
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Typecast clarification
  • From: syuga2012@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: C question
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: external variables
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: external variables
  • From: pete
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: C question
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Books
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Books
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: external variables
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Books
  • From: Flash Gordon
• ED Hardy sunglasses - sunglasses discount
  • From: jmsmark30
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: C question
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: C question
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: external variables
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: external variables
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Books
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Books
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C question
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: C question
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: OIOIC, how about ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: OIOIC, how about ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: c to c++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: c to c++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Books
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C question
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Books
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C question
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: external variables
  • From: Jack Klein
• Re: C question
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• C question
  • From: Ficus Elastica
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: external variables
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: external variables
  • From: Richard
• Re: infinite loop
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: external
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Richard
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Type casting void *
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: validity of a pointer
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Books
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: sequence points and the execution model
  • From: Tim Rentsch
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: [repost] external
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Books
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Books
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: command line
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Books
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: command line
  • From: Richard
• Searching For and Buying Health Insurance in a Bad Economy
  • From: healthplans.cjb@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: command line
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Books
  • From: Richard
• Re: command line
  • From: Richard
• Re: command line
  • From: Richard
• Re: Books
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Books
  • From: user923005
• Re: Books
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Books
  • From: user923005
• Re: Books
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Books
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: c to c++
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Books
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Books
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Books
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Books
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Books
  • From: user923005
• Re: c to c++
  • From: user923005
• Re: Books
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: command line
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: [repost] external
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: command line
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Books
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Books
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Books
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Books
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Books
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Books
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• immigrants visas, Jobs listings, work abroad, study abroad and jobs in your area.
  • From: marco.fernando02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: [repost] external
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Richard
• Re: external
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: external
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: Bartc
• Re: OIOIC, how about ?
  • From: Bartc
• Re: OIOIC, how about ?
  • From: jacob navia
• [repost] external
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: c to c++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: c to c++
  • From: user923005
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: Boon
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: The best way to debug an error
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: c to c++
  • From: user923005
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: c to c++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: c to c++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: OIOIC, how about ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: OIOIC, how about ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: Richard
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Benefit of not defining the order of execution
  • From: somenath
• Re: Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Rule-based AI in C
  • From: copx
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Pay off debt - Best Choice
  • From: burialijjacobsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: Richard
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Han from China
• Re: command line
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Default User
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: OIOIC, how about ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: maan kapoor
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: The best way to debug an error
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: c to c++
  • From: user923005
• Re: Initializing with OL
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Initializing with OL
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Books
  • From: user923005
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard
• Re: Initializing with OL
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Initializing with OL
  • From: user923005
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Initializing with OL
  • From: jimward2
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: command line
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: The best way to debug an error
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: command line
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: The best way to debug an error
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: The best way to debug an error
  • From: Missaka Wijekoon
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Shelbyville
  • From: sparkoheaps
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: The best way to debug an error
  • From: Richard
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: maan kapoor
• The best way to debug an error
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING)
  • From: www.iofferkicks.com
• Re: command line
  • From: Richard
• join group
  • From: ketan
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: c to c++
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer
  • From: Martin Kleiner
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation
  • From: jameskuyper
• Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation
  • From: saurabh29789
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Bin Chen
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Boon
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?
  • From: Tony
• Re: c to c++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Jan Hyde
• Re: c to c++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: external variables
  • From: pete
• Re: command line
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: external variables
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: external variables
  • From: pete
• Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Can you help me to understand this define?
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: Bumbala
• Re: Can you help me to understand this define?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Can you help me to understand this define?
  • From: silusilusilu
• Air Force1 and Air Jordan shoes PAYPAL wholesale
  • From: wholesale
• Books
  • From: Cross
• OIOIC, how about ?
  • From: gclcur
• Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Pranav
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?
  • From: Tony
• external variables
  • From: Larry Gates
• Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc()
  • From: Han from China
• Re: command line
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: command line
  • From: Richard
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: command line
  • From: Ian Collins
• command line
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: c to c++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: c to c++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: c to c++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: c to c++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: c to c++
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: 2DevOrNot2Dev
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Can you help me to understand this define?
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Windows graphics problem
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Windows graphics problem
  • From: maan kapoor
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Can you help me to understand this define?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: c to c++
  • From: user923005
• Can you help me to understand this define?
  • From: silusilusilu
• 0, NULL and variadic functions
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Default User
• Re: c to c++
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Default User
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: c to c++
  • From: pete
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Graphing Convolution
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: 2DevOrNot2Dev
• Re: c to c++
  • From: blacklight
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: c to c++
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Variable Scope ?
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Richard
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: c to c++
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Have you ever thought to know your intelligence level?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: compiling C code
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Graphing Convolution
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Richard Bos
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: John Bode
• Re: c to c++
  • From: blacklight
• Variable Scope ?
  • From: 2DevOrNot2Dev
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Eric Sosman
• http://www.stylishdudes.com cheap sell air max shoes, nike shoes,ugg shoes,jordan shoes,handbag,jeans,shox shoes,Get Nike Shoes at Super Cheap Prices
  • From: www.stylishdudes.com
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: blargg
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Richard
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Lorenzo Villari
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Richard
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Richard
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Richard
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Richard
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: c to c++
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: c to c++
  • From: pete
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: pete
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Evisu Jeans - fashionable
  • From: jmsmark30
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: c to c++
  • From: blacklight
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Pranav
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Prada shoes (paypal payment)www.king-trade.cn )
  • From: shjfklsjf
• NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE
  • From: shjfklsjf
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread.
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: c to c++
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Richard
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: pete
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: c to c++
  • From: s0suk3
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard
• Re: Query for the group
  • From: GANHE DINHEIRO NA WEB
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: blacklight
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: c to c++
  • From: blacklight
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Andrew Smallshaw
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: c to c++
  • From: blacklight
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: c to c++
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China
• c to c++
  • From: eminhanif
• Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines
  • From: Han from China
• [OT] Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: pointer to array of structs
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Bart
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: pointer to array of structs
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• pointer to array of structs
  • From: brownqued
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: Malcolm McLean
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Bart
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread.
  • From: guidoreina
• Re: Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread.
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard
• Re: Query for the group
  • From: richard.townsendrose
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Bruce Cook
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread.
  • From: guidoreina
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: guidoreina
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: Han from China
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China
• New Enthiran Stills ------------>>>>> New Rajini Stills
  • From: rajini.enthiran.robot@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China
• memcpy calls causing segmentation error
  • From: ssylee
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Bruce Cook
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: simple region allocator...
  • From: Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: CBFalconer
• More posts in clc than in clc++ ?
  • From: Tony
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• you can save up to $18,435 on.....
  • From: Deena Richards
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Han from China is off-topic
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Harold Aptroot
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: convert byte array into string
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Ike Naar
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Bruce Cook
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Bruce Cook
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Bart
• Re: (part1a) Han from China teached you C
  • From: Hans Schneider
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: passing char arrays by reference
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: (part1a) Han from China teached you C
  • From: Ike Naar
• Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines
  • From: Han from China
• passing char arrays by reference
  • From: jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A question
  • From: Marc_F_Hult
• Re: (part1a) Han from China teached you C
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: Keith Thompson
• (part1a) Han from China teached you C
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: geo
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days)
  • From: CLC stats
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: Where do I find...
  • From: Swapnajit
• Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Question about sscanf and sprintf
  • From: Bumbala
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: Stephen Sprunk
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Jobs listings, work abroad, study abroad and jobs in your area.
  • From: nicky boy
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Bart
• Re: A question
  • From: Marc_F_Hult
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: Han from China
• Re:
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China
• Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: pete
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Bart
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: pete
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Creating an Apache module
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf()
  • From: Han from China
• nice shopping plaza
  • From: top-ugg.com
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Curtis Dyer
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Richard
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: Richard
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Richard
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment'
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Richard
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Shelbyville
  • From: Jeßus
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: convert byte array into string
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Richard
• Re: New to group
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Richard
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Richard
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Creating an Apache module
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: convert byte array into string
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Creating an Apache module
  • From: Han from China
• Re: New to group
  • From: Tony Holland
• Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines
  • From: Han from China
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: blacklight
• Re: Creating an Apache module
  • From: blacklight
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Creating an Apache module
  • From: mydancake
• Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage
  • From: B Rubble
• Re: fibonacci's music
  • From: Default User
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: Default User
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Han from China
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Nelu
• Re: repeating fraction part
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: repeating fraction part
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: repeating fraction part
  • From: Mark Wooding
• NVHOST Website Design & Custom Programming Supports Cancer Charities
  • From: shopbeenvied.nv@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: fibonacci's music
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Draft paper submission deadline extended: SETP-09
  • From: sr
• Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING)
  • From: www.iofferkicks.com
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Bart
• Re: fibonacci's music
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Where's the FAQ?
  • From: George Petasis
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: REH
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Don Bruder
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: spasmous
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Richard Harter
• Have you ever thought to know your intelligence level?
  • From: iq
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file
  • From: steve
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Richard
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Nelu
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Why do i get runtime error ?
  • From: karthikbalaguru
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Charlton Wilbur
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: convert byte array into string
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Erik Trulsson
• Re: Simple math parser ?
  • From: Guillaume Dargaud
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: chris.j.smith.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: Han from China
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Larry Gates
• Every click makes $ money
  • From: honeymoney
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: Han from China
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Offre d'emploi
  • From: succes344@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Bruce Cook
• Re: Where's the FAQ?
  • From: suchenwi
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: Ike Naar
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Richard
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Richard
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Richard
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Richard
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Richard
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Is void main() OK in this case?
  • From: Roedy Green
• Re: fibonacci's music
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: spasmous
• Re: fibonacci's music
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Pointer difficulties
  • From: user923005
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Han from China
• Pointer difficulties
  • From: spasmous
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: usablevirus
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Omega Constellation Quadra Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx
• Michele Urban Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx
• Concord Saratoga Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx
• Jaeger LeCoultre Grande Taille Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx
• Cartier Pasha Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Shelbyville
  • From: Homer
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments
  • From: baeuar@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: baeuar@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: fibonacci's music
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: fibonacci's music
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Larry Gates
• A Lange & Sohne 1815 Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches20
• Blancpain Villeret Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches20
• Audemars Piguet Canape Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches20
• Oris Williams F1 Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches20
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: James Kuyper
• Christian Audigier Men Outerwear Discount
  • From: shanqiuyu
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Bart
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Han from China
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Dik T. Winter
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments
  • From: pete
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Harold Aptroot
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: convert byte array into string
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Nick Theodorakis
• Re: Query for the group
  • From: Stephen Quinn
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: repeating fraction part
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: REH
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: A question
  • From: Lew
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: Query for the group
  • From: RHui000
• Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?
  • From: syuga2012@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: repeating fraction part
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: REH
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: convert byte array into string
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Richard
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Richard
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: John Bode
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Default User
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Richard
• Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments
  • From: InuY4sha
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Bart
• Re: convert byte array into string
  • From: Bart
• Re: psych question about ignoring people
  • From: chris
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: convert byte array into string
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: convert byte array into string
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: convert byte array into string
  • From: alessio211734
• Re: Where's the FAQ?
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Rav
• Re: Where's the FAQ?
  • From: Ian Osgood
• Re: New to group
  • From: rossum
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: repeating fraction part
  • From: Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Richard
• how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments
  • From: InuY4sha
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: geo
• Re: convert byte array into string
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Harold Aptroot
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• repeating fraction part
  • From: Tagore
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: HeyBub
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: A question
  • From: RedGrittyBrick
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Michael Mattias
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!
  • From: Anthony Fremont
• Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Where's the FAQ?
  • From: Cameron Laird
• Re: Query for the group
  • From: Willie Moore
• convert byte array into string
  • From: alessio211734
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: fmassei
• Re: Where do I find...
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers
  • From: vippstar
• Re: Linux Bananed At My School
  • From: Rex Ballard
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: Linux Bananed At My School
  • From: Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: pete
• Re: Where's the FAQ?
  • From: Larry W. Virden
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Richard
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Rui Maciel
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Gosi
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: structs
  • From: Paul
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Bart
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: New to group
  • From: richard.townsendrose
• Re: Query for the group
  • From: richard.townsendrose
• Re: Simple math parser ?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Where's the FAQ?
  • From: schlenk
• Re: New to group
  • From: rossum
• Re: Query for the group
  • From: Jane Sullivan
• Re: A question
  • From: Jane Sullivan
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Jane Sullivan
• Re: if (pointer) ?
  • From: David Thompson
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Maarten
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Phil Last
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Where do I find...
  • From: CCH
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: Arnold Trembley
• Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file
  • From: Bill Reid
• HOT LIVE NEWS on Your Mobile for free :)
  • From: cliford baak
• Re: Where's the FAQ?
  • From: red floyd
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: David Fanning
• Re: Hello, quick question
  • From: usablevirus
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: Zach
• Re: Where's the FAQ?
  • From: zs0723
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Zach
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: Richard
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Linux Bananed At My School
  • From: Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k)
• Re: Newbie here
  • From: David E. Ross
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Richard
• Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Hello, quick question
  • From: Bradley K. Sherman
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: structs
  • From: Spiros Bousbouras
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Richard
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: structs
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: user923005
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Integer Overflow
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Larry Gates
• Re: structs
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Integer Overflow
  • From: Tagore
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: Default User
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: structs
  • From: Scott David Daniels
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: ssylee
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: John Bode
• Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: Ian Collins
• initializing values of a pointer without using calloc
  • From: ssylee
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Chad
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: structs
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: structs
  • From: Richard
• Re: structs
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Simple math parser ?
  • From: Bart
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: structs
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?
  • From: Rachel
• Re: Simple math parser ?
  • From: Chris McDonald
• I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment'
  • From: Chad
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Linux Bananed At My School
  • From: ray
• Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file
  • From: steve
• Re: Simple math parser ?
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Simple math parser ?
  • From: Guillaume Dargaud
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Bart
• Re: conditional compilation
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Aliasing and optimization
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: conditional compilation
  • From: Rouben Rostamian
• Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Aliasing and optimization
  • From: ln myshkin
• conditional compilation
  • From: onkar . n . mahajan
• Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?
  • From: bad . skipper
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?
  • From: Alex Buell
• Chopard Happy Beach and Happy Fish Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx
• Patek Philippe Golden Ellipse Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx
• Cartier Ballon Bleu de Cartier Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx
• Maurice Lacroix Calipso Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx
• Breguet La Tradition Breguet Watch, Popular Wristwatch
  • From: zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Need clarity on structure alignment
  • From: Tony
• Re: Aliasing and optimization
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: compiling C code
  • From: Curtis Dyer
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Flash Gordon
• Re: Aliasing and optimization
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: James Dow Allen
• moto Mobile PSP Game & memory card
  • From: goodcheap@xxxxxxx
• NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE
  • From: goodcheap@xxxxxxx
• Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?
  • From: Tim Hall
• Aliasing and optimization
  • From: ln myshkin
• Re: psych question about ignoring people
  • From: Zurikela
• Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?
  • From: bob young
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Bart
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Bart
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: pete
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Zach
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: structs
  • From: Nelu
• Re: structs
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• structs
  • From: Bill Cunningham
• Re: ridiculous
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Michele Urban Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches27
• Baume & Mercier Classima Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches27
• Patek Philippe Calatrava Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches27
• Corum Bubble Mini Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches27
• Girard Perregaux Collection Lady Watch, Best Wristwatch
  • From: iwcwatches27
• Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?
  • From: The_LA_Flash
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Zach
• Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• ridiculous
  • From: Zach
• Re: C++ trap representations
  • From: Zach
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Zach
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Zach
• Re: compiling C code
  • From: Zach
• Re: function call overhead
  • From: Zach
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?
  • From: user923005
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Default User
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Christian interested in a mature debate
  • From: Robibnikoff
• Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?
  • From: Robibnikoff
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Christian interested in a mature debate
  • From: John Locke
• fibonacci's music
  • From: oneearthone
• Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?
  • From: vicman
• What's the most elegant way of doing this?
  • From: Alex Buell
• Re: function call overhead
  • From: John Machin
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: RoLo
• Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: christian.bau
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: dj3vande
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: RoLo
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Christian interested in a mature debate
  • From: SkyEyes
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Default User
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: 7
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?
  • From: Lee
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Christian interested in a mature debate
  • From: Christopher A . Lee
• Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?
  • From: Syd M.
• Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?
  • From: Mike
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: 7
• Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?
  • From: Aaron
• Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?
  • From: John Baker
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: user923005
• Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?
  • From: Christopher A . Lee
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Default User
• Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: user923005
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: question about the ISO standard
  • From: amicus_curious
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: user923005
• Re: Need a good anagram for my name
  • From: Mick Tully
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Nelu
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Need a good anagram for my name
  • From: Mick Tully
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: compiling C code
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: Need a good anagram for my name
  • From: Mick Tully
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Jeff R. Edgarson
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: D Herring
• Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: cnoe
• Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks
  • From: Lorenzo Villari
• Re: More data definitions of the C variables
  • From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Steffen Schuler
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: thomas . mertes
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: thomas . mertes
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: lawrence . jones
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Elros
• Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?
  • From: Bill M
• Re: Christian interested in a mature debate
  • From: Bill M
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: Bart
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: gw7rib
• Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: cnoe
• Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: cnoe
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Tauno Voipio
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Rex Ballard
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: James Kuyper
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Ben Bacarisse
• Re: compiling C code
  • From: C. (http://symcbean.blogspot.com/)
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Jerry McBride
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Jothy
• Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages"
  • From: Robin T Cox
• Bitwise 2009 ($5000 prize money)
  • From: birinder
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: C++ trap representations
  • From: anon
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: jacob navia
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Les Neilson
• Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Ryan McCoskrie
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Ludovic Brenta
• Re: compiling C code
  • From: The Natural Philosopher
• Re: compiling C code
  • From: Erwin Moller
• Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt.
  • From: cnoe
• Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file
  • From: Bill Reid
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Ed Morton
• Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?
  • From: Phlip
• Christian Audigier Men Shirts
  • From: lingerliu17
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: pete
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Tim Greer
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Richard
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Decimus Phostle
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: user923005
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Richard
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: What are the safest POSIX functions?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: Peter Nilsson
• Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Janaka
• Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Tim Greer
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Default User
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Jeff R. Edgarson
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: sln
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Keith Thompson
• re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Maximilian
• Re: K&R analog
  • From: Nelu
• Re: C++ trap representations
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: Dr.L.I.Cuesdean, alias Hangeonos, makes a try to learn you about the European Languages from the outset
  • From: Keith Thompson
• K&R analog
  • From: Jeff R. Edgarson
• Re: Can't figure this code out
  • From: Jim Gibson
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: C++ trap representations
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: C++ trap representations
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: C++ trap representations
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file
  • From: Nelu
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• reading in and parsing through a binary file
  • From: steve
• Re: Dr.L.I.Cuesdean, alias Hangeonos, makes a try to learn you about the European Languages from the outset
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: What are the safest POSIX functions?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: What are the safest POSIX functions?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance
  • From: CBFalconer
• Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?
  • From: skillzero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Richard
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Chris Friesen
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Lusotec
• Re: C programming and the Linux kernel
  • From: Tim Greer
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: main prototype pointless?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: John Bode
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: Graphing Convolution
  • From: viper-2
• Re: free problem
  • From: Andres Steinhilber
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: main prototype pointless?
  • From: Kevin D . Quitt
• Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?
  • From: Huibert Bol
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!
  • From: Nelu
• Re: Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!
  • From: Daniel Kraft
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Aaron W . Hsu
• Re: main prototype pointless?
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Fake killfiler Phil Carmody blows his game again
  • From: Han from China - Master Troll
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Nelu
• Re: main prototype pointless?
  • From: Nelu
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?
  • From: Trent
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Chad
• Inline not working properly in GCC?
  • From: James Douglas
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Kenny McCormack
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• RE:Recent Unix Technology News!!!
  • From: Tekwits
• Re: main prototype pointless?
  • From: jameskuyper
• Re: main prototype pointless?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: jacob navia
• main prototype pointless?
  • From: Zach
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Dr.L.I.Cuesdean, alias Hangeonos, makes a try to learn you about the European Languages from the outset
  • From: hangeonos
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Golden California Girls
• re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Keith Thompson
• re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Maximilian
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: pete
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance
  • From: J. J. Farrell
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Joe Wright
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: numerical result out of range
  • From: Lew Pitcher
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: John Bode
• numerical result out of range
  • From: Maximilian
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: Brian Inglis
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Mark McIntyre
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: Gift Certificate not accepted question
  • From: McGyver
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Golden California Girls
• styleweb
  • From: stylewebad@xxxxxxxxx
• styleweb
  • From: stylewebad@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Golden California Girls
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Nate Eldredge
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Rich Webb
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Antoninus Twink
• Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Lorenzo Villari
• Re: [OT] Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Les Harris
• Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty
  • From: Eric Sosman
• Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty
  • From: Richard Heathfield
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: scholz . lothar
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Rich Webb
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: scholz . lothar
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Rich Webb
• Re: free problem
  • From: Barry Schwarz
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42
  • From: Bill
• Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance
  • From: Pete Becker
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Constructing a scalar reference
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Resources about program design in C
  • From: Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Documented error values
  • From: Martin Ambuhl
• Documented error values
  • From: Albert
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: William Pursell
• Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: George Peter Staplin
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Wolfgang Draxinger
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Rich Webb
• Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty
  • From: rkiesling
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Ian Collins
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard Harter
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: Richard
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Richard
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Keith Thompson
• Re: exit() values and the C standards?
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: chris.j.smith.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last month)
  • From: CLC stats
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc
  • From: CBFalconer
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Richard
• Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: kamils80
• Re: Latest string of forgeries
  • From: Richard
• Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert)
  • From: Richard
• Which C Editor/IDE do you use?
  • From: Richard