Re: Segmentation fault
- From: James Kuyper <jameskuyper@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:00:46 GMT
CBFalconer wrote:
Keith Thompson wrote:
... snip ...
Incidentally, you seem to be approximately the fifth person to
point out that s is uninitialized. The first post to mention
this was posted about 9 hours before yours. And yes, that post
did arrive on your server; you and I use the same one.
However my reader shows posts in order of date/time, so the first
thing I read is the original question. I reply, and then find
other answers.
Yes, and that is precisely what he is complaining about. You shouldn't waste other people's time by posting responses that duplicate things someone else has already pointed out. In addition to wasting our time, it also make you look as though you're too stupid to use your newsreader properly. I seriously considered replacing "you look as though" with "it clear that". However, I think this has more to do with stubborn selfishness than with stupidity.
According to your message headers, you're using Mozilla, which is quite capable of letting you read other people's responses to a given message before sending your own. It isn't even necessary to read all the messages in the newsgroup - Mozilla is quite capable of displaying a thread as a tree, so you can easily read all of the responses to one message before reading any other messages on that same thread.
.
- References:
- Segmentation fault
- From: vaib
- Re: Segmentation fault
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: Segmentation fault
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: Segmentation fault
- From: CBFalconer
- Segmentation fault
- Prev by Date: Re: How often do you read the C standard?
- Next by Date: Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution
- Previous by thread: Re: Segmentation fault
- Next by thread: a[i++] = j
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|