Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety

On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:25:47 +0100, Richard <rgrdev_@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

cri@xxxxxxxx (Richard Harter) writes:

On 25 Feb 2009 03:44:15 -0800, Tim Rentsch
<txr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jack Klein <jackklein@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:23:56 -0500, "Jujitsu Lizard"
<jujitsu.lizard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in comp.arch.embedded:

Addendum to my previous post ...

I did a little more dinking with the compiler, and I'm convinced now that it
can't be fully trusted.

As others have pointed out, this is beyond the C standard and
off-topic in comp.lang.c, but definitely topical in
comp.arch.embedded.

In case someone is counting votes, I cast my vote in favor
of this thread -- including both the original question and
all the followups that have remained here -- being welcome
and appropriate in comp.lang.c.

Seconded.

It's about real issues with C. So how can it not be welcome? Very
interesting and C programmers should be aware of the issues.



Richard Harter, cri@xxxxxxxx
http://home.tiac.net/~cri, http://www.varinoma.com
Save the Earth now!!
It's the only planet with chocolate.

The world seems to have forgotten how to set signatures recently.


The signature is set properly at my end; somewhere in the path to
the world something happens.



Richard Harter, cri@xxxxxxxx
http://home.tiac.net/~cri, http://www.varinoma.com
Save the Earth now!!
It's the only planet with chocolate.
.

Relevant Pages