Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: raltbos@xxxxxxxxx (Richard Bos)
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:39:03 GMT
Albert <albert.xtheunknown0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Exactly - Students at my school are not given 'administrator accounts'
on WinXP, and I am a student at this school. Now Borland C++ is
installed. I don't like it. When I need to write one huge source file
with a huge main function with little function breakdown,
You do not need to do that.
What you _do_ need to do is talk to your school's sysadmin, who will
drum it into your untenured head exactly why half-educated, immature
twerps should not be trusted with administrator accounts or even command
line access, ever (and that's just the teachers I was referring to -
pupils are a good deal worse yet); and then talk to your programming
teacher, who will try to explain to you why you need to learn to
organise your programming before you have the gall to complain about the
tools you've been given.
Richard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Albert
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- References:
- "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Albert
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Albert
- "Portable" C compilers?
- Prev by Date: Re: On the development of C
- Next by Date: Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C...
- Previous by thread: Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- Next by thread: Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|