Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:37:31 -0500
nick_keighley_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
CBFalconer <cbfalco...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Albert wrote:
[...] BTW, I've just found out
that Code::Blocks has been installed which has GCC and makes
creating and compiling single source files a lot easier than
Borland C++ Builder Version 6 (year 2002) Professional
(Unregistered).
Anything that has anything called "Code::Blocks" is not C, and is
thus off topic here. It may be C++, which has its own newsgroup.
C++ is a different language.
this from the man who's spent multiple posts explaining the
security features of DOS...
You do seem incapable of following a discussion. The point is that
CLI interfaces can be perfectly safe, and I even referred to an
illustration that does it. Since it was in another language
(assembly) and for a rare OS today (CP/M) I refrained from any
details, but announced where they could be found.
--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: nick_keighley_nospam
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Keith Thompson
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- References:
- "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Albert
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Albert
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Richard Bos
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Albert
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: nick_keighley_nospam
- "Portable" C compilers?
- Prev by Date: Re: sizeof and null pointer
- Next by Date: Re: compilation problem
- Previous by thread: Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- Next by thread: Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|