Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Keith Thompson <kst-u@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:49:36 -0700
CBFalconer <cbfalconer@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
nick_keighley_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
CBFalconer <cbfalco...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Albert wrote:
[...] BTW, I've just found out
that Code::Blocks has been installed which has GCC and makes
creating and compiling single source files a lot easier than
Borland C++ Builder Version 6 (year 2002) Professional
(Unregistered).
Anything that has anything called "Code::Blocks" is not C, and is
thus off topic here. It may be C++, which has its own newsgroup.
C++ is a different language.
this from the man who's spent multiple posts explaining the
security features of DOS...
You do seem incapable of following a discussion. The point is that
CLI interfaces can be perfectly safe, and I even referred to an
illustration that does it. Since it was in another language
(assembly) and for a rare OS today (CP/M) I refrained from any
details, but announced where they could be found.
Chuck. You assumed (incorrectly, as it turns out) that "Code::Blocks"
must have nothing to do with C, and must therefore be off topic. And
yet you felt it necessary to discuss CP/M at some length. Even if
CP/M were relevant to the specific discussion, you can hardly claim
that it's topical for this newsgroup.
Why is Code::Blocks off topic, while CP/M is on topic?
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@xxxxxxx <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Richard
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- References:
- "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Albert
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Malcolm McLean
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Albert
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Richard Bos
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: Albert
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: CBFalconer
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: nick_keighley_nospam
- Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- From: CBFalconer
- "Portable" C compilers?
- Prev by Date: Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme
- Next by Date: Re: (INT_MIN -1) > 0 equals to 0??
- Previous by thread: Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- Next by thread: Re: "Portable" C compilers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|