comp.lang.c

• Date Index

---

• how to check for out of disk space, rtillmore
• Re: APUE alternatives, Rob Clarke
  • Re: APUE alternatives, Keith Thompson
• C scripting (continued), jacob navia
  • Re: C scripting (continued), jacob navia
  • Re: C scripting (continued), Bartc
    • Re: C scripting (continued), jacob navia
  • Re: C scripting (continued), Keith Thompson
    • Re: C scripting (continued), jacob navia
      • Re: C scripting (continued), Kenny McCormack
• size_t compare with zero, labros07
  • Re: size_t compare with zero, labros07
    • Re: size_t compare with zero, Keith Thompson
  • Re: size_t compare with zero, Boon
  • Re: size_t compare with zero, James Kuyper
  • Re: size_t compare with zero, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: size_t compare with zero, Ben Bacarisse
• ifdef with ||, jimward2
  • Re: ifdef with ||, Boon
    • Re: ifdef with ||, jimward2
  • Re: ifdef with ||, James Kuyper
  • Re: ifdef with ||, Martin Ambuhl
• Corrected: Proposal: Increasing type safety with a keyword, Ioannis Vranos
  • Re: Corrected: Proposal: Increasing type safety with a keyword, Ioannis Vranos
  • Re: Corrected: Proposal: Increasing type safety with a keyword, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Corrected: Proposal: Increasing type safety with a keyword, pete
• [ANN] Data Plotting Library DISLIN 9.5, Helmut Michels
• char type size, Francis Moreau
  • Re: char type size, Ian Collins
    • Re: char type size, Francis Moreau
      • Re: char type size, Boon
      • Re: char type size, Francis Moreau
  • Re: char type size, Boon
    • Re: char type size, Francis Moreau
  • Re: char type size, jacob navia
    • Re: char type size, Francis Moreau
• online spielen ohne geld,legal schnell und einfach geld,schnell und einfach an geld,webmaster geld verdienen,schnell und sicher geld,, mido332
• Explanation of ? operator missing in reference guide, Skybuck Flying
  • Message not available
    • Re: Explanation of ? operator missing in reference guide, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: Explanation of ? operator missing in reference guide, Skybuck Flying
      • Re: Explanation of ? operator missing in reference guide, Bartc
      • Re: Explanation of ? operator missing in reference guide, Richard Tobin
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Explanation of ? operator missing in reference guide, Keith Thompson
• Problem getting a string with blanks in it, ddk1965
  • Re: Problem getting a string with blanks in it, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Problem getting a string with blanks in it, ddk1965
      • Re: Problem getting a string with blanks in it, Bartc
      • Re: Problem getting a string with blanks in it, ddk1965
      • Re: Problem getting a string with blanks in it, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: Problem getting a string with blanks in it, ddk1965
• string related question, aki
  • Re: string related question, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: string related question, aki
    • Re: string related question, aki
• About SIGFPE, pavunkumar
  • Re: About SIGFPE, user923005
  • Re: About SIGFPE, Eric Sosman
• Lseek Error, pavunkumar
  • Re: Lseek Error, James Kuyper
  • Re: Lseek Error, Rob Clarke
• Difference between sigset and singal function, pavunkumar
  • Re: Difference between sigset and singal function, James Kuyper
    • Re: Difference between sigset and singal function, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: Difference between sigset and singal function, Jens Thoms Toerring
• macro include question, sinbad
  • Re: macro include question, sinbad
  • Re: macro include question, Ike Naar
• Help - trying to serialize a struct, erbm
  • Message not available
    • Re: Help - trying to serialize a struct, erbm
      • Re: Help - trying to serialize a struct, Ian Collins
      • Re: Help - trying to serialize a struct, erbm
      • Re: Help - trying to serialize a struct, erbm
      • Re: Help - trying to serialize a struct, erbm
      • Re: Help - trying to serialize a struct, erbm
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Help - trying to serialize a struct, erbm
    • Re: Help - trying to serialize a struct, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: Help - trying to serialize a struct, erbm
    • Re: Help - trying to serialize a struct, user923005
    • Re: Help - trying to serialize a struct, Mark Wooding
• switch() Statement Question, Jujitsu Lizard
  • Re: switch() Statement Question, Eric Sosman
    • Re: switch() Statement Question, Richard Harter
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Eric Sosman
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Richard Harter
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Eric Sosman
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Richard Harter
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Eric Sosman
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Richard Harter
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, James Kuyper
  • Re: switch() Statement Question, jameskuyper
    • Re: switch() Statement Question, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, William Pursell
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Eric Sosman
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Golden California Girls
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, CBFalconer
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, lawrence . jones
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, William Pursell
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Richard
    • Re: switch() Statement Question, lndresnick
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, lndresnick
    • Re: switch() Statement Question, Ivan A. Kosarev
  • Re: switch() Statement Question, Han from China
    • Re: switch() Statement Question, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: switch() Statement Question, Ivan A. Kosarev
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Han from China
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Ivan A. Kosarev
    • Re: switch() Statement Question, Rob Clarke
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Han from China
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Rob Clarke
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Rob Clarke
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Golden California Girls
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Richard Tobin
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Rob Clarke
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Richard
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Keith Thompson
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Han from China
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Rob Clarke
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, jameskuyper
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Eric Sosman
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, jameskuyper
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Han from China
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Han from China
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Keith Thompson
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Richard
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Rob Clarke
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, jameskuyper
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Han from China
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Richard Harter
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, jacob navia
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Keith Thompson
      • Re: switch() Statement Question, Han from China
• A Question regarding format specifiers ,, aki
  • Re: A Question regarding format specifiers ,, Ben Bacarisse
• New Style Abercrombie and Fitch Bags - Discount, jmsmark88
• My killfile, Han from China
  • Re: My killfile, Han from China
    • Re: My killfile, nicollete
      • Re: My killfile, Han from China
      • Re: My killfile, jameskuyper
      • Re: My killfile, Richard
      • Re: My killfile, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: My killfile, Golden California Girls
    • Re: My killfile, Han from China
• please help a beginner, erbm
  • Re: please help a beginner, blargg
  • Re: please help a beginner, Christian Kandeler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • please help a beginner, erbm
    • Re: please help a beginner, Eric Sosman
      • Re: please help a beginner, erbm
      • Re: please help a beginner, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: please help a beginner, erbm
      • Re: please help a beginner, William Pursell
      • Re: please help a beginner, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: please help a beginner, erbm
      • Re: please help a beginner, Richard Heathfield
• 2 questions about signals, Spiros Bousbouras
  • Re: 2 questions about signals, Han from China
    • Re: 2 questions about signals, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: 2 questions about signals, Han from China
  • Re: 2 questions about signals, James Kuyper
    • Re: 2 questions about signals, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: 2 questions about signals, jameskuyper
• www.dudes-mall.com sell:nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,ed hardy,(jean,handbag,cap,sunglass,shoes,t-shirt)air force one shoes,lv,gucci,D&G,bbc,coachUGG boot:$50,.free shipping!, www.dudes-mall.com
• www.fashion4biz.com sell ugg boot,tshirt,handbag,nike shoes,jordan shoes,dunk shoes,puma shoes,and so on for free shippiong from, nikeshoes564@xxxxxxxxx
• Cheap air jordan shoes nike shoes wholesale/retail at www.guoshitrade.com, jersey1234
• www.stylishdudes.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,ed hardy,(jean,handbag,cap,sunglass,shoes,t-shirt)air force one shoes,lv,gucci,D&G,bbc,coach.free shipping!, dudesmallmike224@xxxxxxxxx
• Behaviour, prasoonthegreat
  • Re: Behaviour, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Behaviour, prasoonthegreat
      • Re: Behaviour, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Behaviour, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Behaviour, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Behaviour, Han from China
  • Re: Behaviour, CBFalconer
• New Style True Religion Men's Jeans - discount, jmsmark88
• Introduce a memory structre viewer., cxj01155
• Beautiful JAPAn Girls PLAY UNcensored PORN MOVIE [RS] Kanulau Gachinko #52 - Uncensored [RMVB] ++ Nude Asian Model Collection 2 ---, morabel . tunia
• How implement alfa channel, doc . bullwinkle
  • Re: How implement alfa channel, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: How implement alfa channel, overview
    • Re: How implement alfa channel, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How implement alfa channel, Phil Carmody
      • Re: How implement alfa channel, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How implement alfa channel, Phil Carmody
      • Re: How implement alfa channel, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: How implement alfa channel, Phil Carmody
      • Re: How implement alfa channel, Bartc
      • Re: How implement alfa channel, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: How implement alfa channel, Bartc
  • Re: How implement alfa channel, Eric Sosman
    • Re: How implement alfa channel, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: How implement alfa channel, Eric Sosman
      • Re: How implement alfa channel, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: How implement alfa channel, Eric Sosman
    • Re: How implement alfa channel, Bartc
      • Re: How implement alfa channel, Ben Bacarisse
• WWW.FASHION4BIZ.COM NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5V JORDANS 5FUSION NIKE, nikeshoes312@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• confused, leo
  • Re: confused, Ian Collins
    • Re: confused, CBFalconer
      • Re: confused, leo
      • Re: confused, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: confused, Han from China
      • Re: confused, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: confused, Han from China
      • Re: confused, leo
      • Re: confused, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: confused, Han from China
      • Re: confused, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: confused, Han from China
      • Re: confused, Richard
  • Re: confused, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: confused, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: confused, Han from China
  • Re: confused, Ike Naar
• How does the compiler know that sqrt has no side effects?, Rouben Rostamian
  • Re: How does the compiler know that sqrt has no side effects?, Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: How does the compiler know that sqrt has no side effects?, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: How does the compiler know that sqrt has no side effects?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: How does the compiler know that sqrt has no side effects?, Flash Gordon
    • Re: How does the compiler know that sqrt has no side effects?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: How does the compiler know that sqrt has no side effects?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: How does the compiler know that sqrt has no side effects?, CBFalconer
    • Re: How does the compiler know that sqrt has no side effects?, Eric Sosman
• NEW Ed Hardy T shirts - Fashion, amamark858
• how this works? is it or bug or not???, AliM
  • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Fred
  • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Eric Sosman
    • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Eric Sosman
  • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Eric Sosman
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Han from China
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, CBFalconer
    • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Flash Gordon
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Han from China
  • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Ioannis Vranos
    • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Han from China
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Ioannis Vranos
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Eric Sosman
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, CBFalconer
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, CBFalconer
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Richard
    • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Ioannis Vranos
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, pete
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Keith Thompson
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Ioannis Vranos
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Keith Thompson
      • Re: how this works? is it or bug or not???, Richard
• China Cheap Brand Purses JIMMY THOO D&G VERSACE True leather AAA Wholesale,Free shipping, fujnde1234
• String operations with unsigned char arrays, Boon
  • Re: String operations with unsigned char arrays, Fred
  • Re: String operations with unsigned char arrays, Eric Sosman
  • Re: String operations with unsigned char arrays, pete
• Incorrect index computation, Boon
  • Re: Incorrect index computation, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Incorrect index computation, Boon
      • Re: Incorrect index computation, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Incorrect index computation, pete
      • Re: Incorrect index computation, Han from China
      • Re: Incorrect index computation, Eric Sosman
• doubt with char array, aki
  • Re: doubt with char array, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: doubt with char array, aki
      • Re: doubt with char array, mark . bluemel
      • Re: doubt with char array, aki
  • Re: doubt with char array, mark . bluemel
    • Re: doubt with char array, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: doubt with char array, mark . bluemel
      • Re: doubt with char array, Richard Heathfield
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • doubt with char array, aki
• hurray for stdlib!, luser-ex-troll
  • Re: hurray for stdlib!, Jack Klein
    • Re: hurray for stdlib!, luserXtrog
      • Re: hurray for stdlib!, Ian Collins
      • Re: hurray for stdlib!, Jens Thoms Toerring
• Searching for Happiness ?, corner . 90
• Shared header-file?, Han from Lule
  • Re: Shared header-file?, pete
    • Re: Shared header-file?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Shared header-file?, Han from China
      • Re: Shared header-file?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Shared header-file?, Han from China
      • Re: Shared header-file?, pete
  • Re: Shared header-file?, Stephen Sprunk
• C as a scripting language, jacob navia
  • Re: C as a scripting language, Keith Thompson
    • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Boon
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Chris Dollin
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, pete
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, pete
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, pete
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, pete
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, pete
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, pete
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard Bos
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: C as a scripting language, James Kuyper
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Joe Wright
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
    • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Keith Thompson
  • Re: C as a scripting language, Bartc
  • Re: C as a scripting language, George Peter Staplin
    • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
    • Re: C as a scripting language, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: C as a scripting language, Flash Gordon
    • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
      • Re: C as a scripting language, William Pursell
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Ian Collins
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard Bos
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
  • Re: C as a scripting language, Mark Wooding
    • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: C as a scripting language, Ian Collins
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jfbode1029
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: C as a scripting language, luserXtrog
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Ian Collins
      • Re: C as a scripting language, TonyMc
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Azazel
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard Bos
  • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
    • Re: C as a scripting language, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: C as a scripting language, James Kuyper
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Flash Gordon
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
      • Re: C as a scripting language, James Kuyper
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Han from China
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jameskuyper
      • Re: C as a scripting language, James Kuyper
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard
    • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: C as a scripting language, Chris McDonald
    • Re: C as a scripting language, Flash Gordon
  • Re: C as a scripting language, Tristan Miller
    • Re: C as a scripting language, gwowen
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Tristan Miller
      • Re: C as a scripting language, James Kuyper
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Tristan Miller
    • Re: C as a scripting language, James Kuyper
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Tristan Miller
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jameskuyper
  • Re: C as a scripting language, Ed Prochak
  • Re: C as a scripting language, Chris Dollin
  • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard Bos
    • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard Bos
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
  • Re: C as a scripting language, Tristan Miller
    • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jfbode1029
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Ike Naar
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Tristan Miller
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jfbode1029
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jacob navia
      • Re: C as a scripting language, jfbode1029
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Bartc
    • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard Bos
      • Re: C as a scripting language, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C as a scripting language, CBFalconer
      • [OT] Re: C as a scripting language, Eric Sosman
• Heathfield's ongoing hypocrisy and plug denials, Han from China
• New Styles ED hardy Bikinis - Fashion, jmsmark80
• Corrected: Using type suffixes with floating point constants, Ioannis Vranos
  • Re: Corrected: Using type suffixes with floating point constants, pete
  • Re: Corrected: Using type suffixes with floating point constants, Ioannis Vranos
  • Re: Corrected: Using type suffixes with floating point constants, Ioannis Vranos
    • Re: Corrected: Using type suffixes with floating point constants, Ioannis Vranos
  • Re: Corrected: Using type suffixes with floating point constants, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Corrected: Using type suffixes with floating point constants, Ioannis Vranos
      • Re: Corrected: Using type suffixes with floating point constants, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Corrected: Using type suffixes with floating point constants, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Corrected: Using type suffixes with floating point constants, James Kuyper
• Using type prefixes with floating point constants, Ioannis Vranos
  • Re: Using type prefixes with floating point constants, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Using type prefixes with floating point constants, Ioannis Vranos
      • Re: Using type prefixes with floating point constants, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Using type prefixes with floating point constants, Dik T. Winter
• Re: Pascal's triangle code - Please help!, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: Pascal's triangle code - Please help!, pete
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pascal's triangle code - Please help!, Jens Thoms Toerring
• GRAB THE GOLDEN OPPURTUNITY TO EARN MORE MONEY IN THE WORLD, ganesh 2
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • GRAB THE GOLDEN OPPURTUNITY TO EARN MORE MONEY IN THE WORLD, hari 1
• WWW.FASHION4BIZ.COM cheaper g-satr kidrobot hoodies ed hardy star red monkey gino green global true religion ed-hardy kidrobot jeans hoodies china supplier wholesaler exporters,manufacture, nikeshoesni1@xxxxxxxxx
• Function pointer in argument list, hectorchu
  • Re: Function pointer in argument list, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Function pointer in argument list, pete
    • Re: Function pointer in argument list, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Function pointer in argument list, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Function pointer in argument list, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Function pointer in argument list, Han from China
    • Re: Function pointer in argument list, hectorchu
• What does "object" mean in "object file"?, RealCat
  • Re: What does "object" mean in "object file"?, Joachim Schmitz
    • Re: What does "object" mean in "object file"?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: What does "object" mean in "object file"?, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: What does "object" mean in "object file"?, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: What does "object" mean in "object file"?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: What does "object" mean in "object file"?, Gordon Burditt
• what's wrong with the bitwise operators, Neil
  • Re: what's wrong with the bitwise operators, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: what's wrong with the bitwise operators, Han from China
    • Re: what's wrong with the bitwise operators, Neil
      • Re: what's wrong with the bitwise operators, Han from China
• tin tức ngày hôm nay, hello
• Open source my OIOIC, a completely new object-oriented mechanism for the C., pervise . zhao
  • Message not available
    • Re: Open source my OIOIC, a completely new object-oriented mechanism for the C., user923005
      • Re: Open source my OIOIC, a completely new object-oriented mechanism for the C., rkiesling
      • Re: Open source my OIOIC, a completely new object-oriented mechanism for the C., pervise . zhao
  • Re: Open source my OIOIC, a completely new object-oriented mechanism for the C., blargg
• [OT] proxy test, Bill Cunningham
  • Re: [OT] proxy test, Keith Thompson
    • Re: [OT] proxy test, Bill Cunningham
  • Re: [OT] proxy test, Richard Bos
• call traceback library, Wolfgang Draxinger
  • Re: call traceback library (forgot the arch), Wolfgang Draxinger
    • Re: call traceback library (forgot the arch), Nate Eldredge
      • Re: call traceback library (forgot the arch), Wolfgang Draxinger
• www.stylishdudes.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,ed hardy,(jean,handbag,cap,sunglass,shoes,t-shirt)air force one shoes,lv,gucci,D&G,bbc,coach.free shipping, www.iofferkicks.com
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • www.stylishdudes.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,ed hardy,(jean,handbag,cap,sunglass,shoes,t-shirt)air force one shoes,lv,gucci,D&G,bbc,coach.free shipping, dudesmallmike224@xxxxxxxxx
• Nike Shoes ,UGG Shoes,NFLjerseys, PUMA shoes,Adidas shoes Etc. brand merchandise, nikenba
• Ed Hardy Rhinestone Hat - Fashionable, ljanet859
• C90 penetration, kerravon
  • Re: C90 penetration, Eric Sosman
    • Re: C90 penetration, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, George Peter Staplin
      • Re: C90 penetration, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: C90 penetration, Andrew Haley
      • Re: C90 penetration, Jack Klein
      • Re: C90 penetration, Tristan Miller
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, James Kuyper
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, jameskuyper
      • Re: C90 penetration, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: C90 penetration, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C90 penetration, jameskuyper
      • Re: C90 penetration, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, CBFalconer
      • Re: C90 penetration, James Kuyper
      • Re: C90 penetration, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C90 penetration, CBFalconer
      • Re: C90 penetration, Golden California Girls
      • Re: C90 penetration, Bart van Ingen Schenau
      • Re: C90 penetration, James Kuyper
      • Re: C90 penetration, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C90 penetration, CBFalconer
      • Re: C90 penetration, James Kuyper
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C90 penetration, James Kuyper
      • Re: C90 penetration, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C90 penetration, CBFalconer
      • Re: C90 penetration, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard Bos
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, James Kuyper
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, James Kuyper
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: C90 penetration, CBFalconer
      • Re: C90 penetration, wolfgang . riedel52
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
    • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard Bos
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Message not available
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Message not available
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard Bos
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, Phil Carmody
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, Keith Thompson
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard Bos
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: C90 penetration, Richard Bos
      • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Thad Smith
      • Re: C90 penetration, Walter Banks
      • Re: C90 penetration, Bart van Ingen Schenau
  • Re: C90 penetration, Tristan Miller
    • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
      • Re: C90 penetration, Tristan Miller
  • Re: C90 penetration, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: C90 penetration, kerravon
• multiple macro defns, sinbad
  • Re: multiple macro defns, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: multiple macro defns, sinbad
      • Re: multiple macro defns, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: multiple macro defns, Keith Thompson
  • Re: multiple macro defns, James Kuyper
  • Re: multiple macro defns, pete
    • Re: multiple macro defns, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: multiple macro defns, Keith Thompson
      • Re: multiple macro defns, pete
      • Re: multiple macro defns, sinbad
      • Re: multiple macro defns, Keith Thompson
• Re: AVL tree without malloc in C, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: AVL tree without malloc in C, Han from China
    • Re: AVL tree without malloc in C, Richard Bos
• Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Eric Sosman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Ben Bacarisse
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Fred
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Ben Bacarisse
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Keith Thompson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, CBFalconer
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Keith Thompson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Andrey Tarasevich
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Chris Dollin
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, mark . bluemel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, James Kuyper
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, CBFalconer
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, JosephKK
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Eric Sosman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, Bartc
  • Re: Can inclusion of a printf() effect a calculation? Please help!!, pete
• Question about reading from stream., Carfield Yim
  • Re: Question about reading from stream., jameskuyper
  • Re: Question about reading from stream., Flash Gordon
    • Re: Question about reading from stream., Carfield Yim
• Alter line of file, Jens
  • Re: Alter line of file, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: Alter line of file, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: Alter line of file, user923005
  • Re: Alter line of file, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: Alter line of file, Flash Gordon
• games bonus win prize web sites, malarmuthu.r@xxxxxxxxx
• ATO Matsumoto Men Shoes - Discount, ljanet8585
• strings and malloc(), Mark
  • Re: strings and malloc(), pete
    • Re: strings and malloc(), CBFalconer
      • Re: strings and malloc(), Keith Thompson
      • Re: strings and malloc(), Han from China
      • Re: strings and malloc(), pete
  • Re: strings and malloc(), Paul Hsieh
    • Re: strings and malloc(), Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: strings and malloc(), Phil Carmody
      • Re: strings and malloc(), nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: strings and malloc(), jameskuyper
    • Re: strings and malloc(), pete
      • Re: strings and malloc(), Keith Thompson
  • Re: strings and malloc(), Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: strings and malloc(), Gordon Burditt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: strings and malloc(), Eric Sosman
    • Re: strings and malloc(), Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: strings and malloc(), Eric Sosman
      • Re: strings and malloc(), Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: strings and malloc(), James Kuyper
      • Re: strings and malloc(), Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: strings and malloc(), Eric Sosman
      • Re: strings and malloc(), Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: strings and malloc(), jameskuyper
  • Re: strings and malloc(), Bart van Ingen Schenau
• www.cheapjordansneakers.com wholesale cheap chanel Gucci Handbags Purses ..., chinalook4@xxxxxxxxx
• >>> GRAPHIC DESIGNERS <<<__________________________________________, braggporequited
• Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Chakib Benziane
  • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Keith Thompson
  • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Michael Melanson
  • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), jameskuyper
  • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Chakib Benziane
    • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Flash Gordon
  • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Chakib Benziane
    • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Richard Bos
      • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), JosephKK
      • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Chakib Benziane
    • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Chakib Benziane
      • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Cannot find error on my program ( verry basic C stuff ), Keith Thompson
• Why doesn't return (a % b == 0) work?, Chad
  • Re: Why doesn't return (a % b == 0) work?, luser-ex-troll
  • Re: Why doesn't return (a % b == 0) work?, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Why doesn't return (a % b == 0) work?, jfbode1029
  • Re: Why doesn't return (a % b == 0) work?, jfbode1029
  • Re: Why doesn't return (a % b == 0) work?, Andrey Tarasevich
  • Re: Why doesn't return (a % b == 0) work?, Don Bruder
• to give files unique no, sinbad
  • Re: to give files unique no, mark_bluemel
    • Re: to give files unique no, sinbad
      • Re: to give files unique no, Chris Dollin
      • Re: to give files unique no, mark_bluemel
  • Re: to give files unique no, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: to give files unique no, Richard
      • Re: to give files unique no, lndresnick
      • Re: to give files unique no, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: to give files unique no, Richard
      • Re: to give files unique no, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: to give files unique no, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: to give files unique no, Eric Sosman
      • Re: to give files unique no, Eric Sosman
      • Re: to give files unique no, Kojak
      • Re: to give files unique no, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: to give files unique no, Richard
      • Re: to give files unique no, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: to give files unique no, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: to give files unique no, Jack Klein
  • Re: to give files unique no, Michael Angelo Ravera
• correct macro definitions, sinbad
  • Re: correct macro definitions, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: correct macro definitions, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: correct macro definitions, Richard
      • Re: correct macro definitions, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: correct macro definitions, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: correct macro definitions, Richard
      • Re: correct macro definitions, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: correct macro definitions, Han from China
      • Re: correct macro definitions, Han from China
  • Re: correct macro definitions, Chris M. Thomasson
• Newbie, Echo Weep
  • Re: Newbie, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: Newbie, Echo Weep
      • Re: Newbie, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Newbie, Echo Weep
      • Re: Newbie, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Newbie, Default User
    • Re: Newbie, Han from China
  • Re: Newbie, James Kuyper
    • Re: Newbie, Bill Waddington
      • Re: Newbie, James Dow Allen
      • Re: Newbie, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Newbie, JosephKK
      • Re: Newbie, CBFalconer
  • Re: Newbie, mark_bluemel
    • Re: Newbie, CBFalconer
    • Re: Newbie, Han from China
  • Re: Newbie, jfbode1029
  • Re: Newbie (Followup), Echo Weep
    • Re: Newbie (Followup), Flash Gordon
      • Re: Newbie (Followup), Echo Weep
      • Re: Newbie (Followup), JosephKK
    • Re: Newbie (Followup), jfbode1029
      • Re: Newbie (Followup), Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Newbie (Followup), jameskuyper
      • Re: Newbie (Followup), Keith Thompson
  • Re: Newbie, Preston
  • Re: Newbie, CBFalconer
    • Re: Newbie, Echo Weep
      • Re: Newbie, Richard
      • Re: Newbie, Echo Weep
      • Re: Newbie, Richard
      • Re: Newbie, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Newbie, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Newbie, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: Newbie, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Message not available
      • Re: Newbie, rio
      • Re: Newbie, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Newbie, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Newbie, CBFalconer
      • Re: Newbie, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Newbie, CBFalconer
      • Re: Newbie, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Newbie, William Pursell
      • Re: Newbie, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Richard
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Richard
      • Re: Newbie, James Kuyper
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, jameskuyper
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, CBFalconer
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Richard
      • Re: Newbie, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Newbie, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, James Kuyper
      • Re: Newbie, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Newbie, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, CBFalconer
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Richard Bos
      • Re: Newbie, CBFalconer
      • Re: Newbie, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Newbie, Richard Bos
      • Re: Newbie, James Kuyper
      • Re: Newbie, CBFalconer
      • Re: Newbie, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Richard Bos
      • Re: Newbie, Richard
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Richard
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Ian Collins
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Newbie, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Newbie, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, pete
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, pete
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, pete
      • Re: Newbie, pete
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, Han from China
      • Re: Newbie, CBFalconer
  • Re: Newbie, Phil Carmody
    • Re: Newbie, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: Newbie, Bartc
      • Re: Newbie, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Newbie, Echo Weep
• no declaration inside for loop header, Gary
  • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, vlsidesign
      • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, luserXtrog
      • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, blargg
      • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, James Kuyper
      • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, Keith Thompson
      • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, CBFalconer
      • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, Keith Thompson
      • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, Ben Bacarisse
      • [OT] Re: no declaration inside for loop header, Eric Sosman
      • Re: [OT] Re: no declaration inside for loop header, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, vlsidesign
  • Re: no declaration inside for loop header, pete
• types [follwup: code works], Bill Cunningham
  • Re: types [follwup: code works], Kojak
  • Re: types [follwup: code works], Joe Wright
  • Re: types [follwup: code works], Barry Schwarz
  • Re: types [follwup: code works], George Peter Staplin
    • Re: types [follwup: code works], Bill Cunningham
      • Re: types [follwup: code works], Keith Thompson
      • Re: types [follwup: code works], Bill Cunningham
      • Re: types [follwup: code works], Keith Thompson
      • Re: types [follwup: code works], Bill Cunningham
• www.stylishdudes.com sell:nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(free shipping), www.iofferkicks.com
• Accessing complex data from a linked list based data structure.., Ram
  • Re: Accessing complex data from a linked list based data structure.., pete
  • Re: Accessing complex data from a linked list based data structure.., Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Accessing complex data from a linked list based data structure.., George Peter Staplin
    • Re: Accessing complex data from a linked list based data structure.., Ram
      • Re: Accessing complex data from a linked list based data structure.., Barry Schwarz
• memory allocation inside a structure, softvig88
  • Re: memory allocation inside a structure, Golden California Girls
  • Re: memory allocation inside a structure, Han from China
• mktime returns too many seconds, Eric
  • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Eric
  • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Lew Pitcher
    • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Eric
  • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Willem
  • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Keith Thompson
    • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Eric
      • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Bartc
      • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Eric Sosman
      • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Han from China
      • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: mktime returns too many seconds, Han from China
• kostenlos geld im internet verdienen,internet geld verdiehnen,www schnell geld,1 geld machen,mit youtube geld verdienen,ich will geld machen,, tampatoker12
• mann schnell geld verdienen,schnell geld gewinnen,online werbung geld verdienen,holdem poker online spielen,aus geld geld machen,internet geld veridenen,, beata831
• ANNOUNCE: PL/compiler post doc position DEADLINE: May 31, 2009, mark010101
• receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, jc
  • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, Eric Sosman
    • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, jameskuyper
      • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, Eric Sosman
    • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, lawrence . jones
  • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, jayachandran kamaraj
      • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, Eric Sosman
      • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, pete
      • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, jayachandran kamaraj
      • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, Keith Thompson
  • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, Joe Wright
    • Re: receiving pointer through function parameter similar to argv, jayachandran kamaraj
• Volatile and code reordering, REH
  • Re: Volatile and code reordering, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Volatile and code reordering, REH
• Shoes: Ca,Gucci,Parda,Lv,D&G,Chanel,Puma,Hogan,Bape,Armani,Ugg,Ice,Versace,Ed-Hardy - dunk, answer8273
• restoring errno in signal handlers, Hallvard B Furuseth
  • Re: restoring errno in signal handlers, Roberto Divia
    • Re: restoring errno in signal handlers, Hallvard B Furuseth
  • Re: restoring errno in signal handlers, Kaz Kylheku
• Help needed on CC, Gaudha
  • Re: Help needed on CC, Chris Dollin
    • Re: Help needed on CC, James Kuyper
      • Re: Help needed on CC, hume . spamfilter
  • Re: Help needed on CC, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Help needed on CC, CBFalconer
    • Re: Help needed on CC, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Help needed on CC, Mark McIntyre
• How to write a wrapper for printf?, kj
  • Re: How to write a wrapper for printf?, nick_keighley_nospam
• Cheapest desktop Pc @ www.bharatcraft.com, Siduction
• Working hard at Internet but nothing makes Smile at your Lips???So click here, Siduction
• What a magic??? Click the link given below and look what you have won., Siduction
• Setting the length of a file, Old Wolf
  • Re: Setting the length of a file, Darren Cubitt
    • Re: Setting the length of a file, Darren Cubitt
  • Re: Setting the length of a file, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Setting the length of a file, JosephKK
    • Re: Setting the length of a file, Keith Thompson
• embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, luser-ex-troll
  • Message not available
    • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Mark Wooding
  • Message not available
    • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Phil Carmody
  • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, luser-ex-troll
  • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Bartc
    • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Bartc
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Richard Harter
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, CBFalconer
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, luser-ex-troll
      • cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Keith Thompson
      • stylish albeit terse?, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, pete
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, pete
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luserXtrog
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, pete
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Nate Eldredge
      • Indian Hill, my favorite online style guide, was Re: cooking the spaghetti, pete
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Flash Gordon
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Phil Carmody
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, jameskuyper
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Flash Gordon
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, rio
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luserXtrog
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, pete
      • Message not available
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, rio
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, CBFalconer
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, CBFalconer
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Phil Carmody
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Default User
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Harter
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Harter
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, pete
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, pete
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, CBFalconer
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, pete
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, CBFalconer
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, pete
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, CBFalconer
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, pete
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Harter
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Harter
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, CBFalconer
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, CBFalconer
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luserXtrog
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Keith Thompson
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luserXtrog
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, William Pursell
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, JosephKK
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Han from China
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Bos
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Han from China
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luserXtrog
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luserXtrog
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luserXtrog
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Ian Collins
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luserXtrog
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: cooking the spaghetti, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Richard Harter
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Richard Bos
  • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, gw7rib
    • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Flash Gordon
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Richard
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: embarrassing spaghetti code needs stylistic advice, luser-ex-troll
• Help understanding this use of while, Chris Saunders
  • Re: Help understanding this use of while, pete
    • Re: Help understanding this use of while, George Peter Staplin
  • Re: Help understanding this use of while, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Help understanding this use of while, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Help understanding this use of while, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Help understanding this use of while, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Help understanding this use of while, CBFalconer
  • Re: Help understanding this use of while, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Help understanding this use of while, pete
    • Re: Help understanding this use of while, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: Help understanding this use of while, pete
    • Re: Help understanding this use of while, Phil Carmody
• code works, Bill Cunningham
  • Re: code works, Keith Thompson
    • Re: code works, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: code works, Keith Thompson
      • Re: code works, CBFalconer
  • Re: code works, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: code works, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: code works, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: code works, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: code works, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: code works, Han from China
  • Re: code works, Han from China
  • Re: code works, Keith Thompson
    • Re: code works, Bill Cunningham
• Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Emmanuel Stapf [ES]
  • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Emmanuel Stapf [ES]
      • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Lew Pitcher
    • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Emmanuel Stapf [ES]
  • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Walter Banks
  • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Emmanuel Stapf [ES]
  • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, JosephKK
    • Re: Is there a way to flush registers and tell the C compiler to refill?, Kaz Kylheku
• Discount cheap 2009 Nike shoes,Air Jordan shoes, NBA NFL MLB NHL all star Paypal Payment, rjmy123
• Binary tree, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: Binary tree, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Binary tree, user923005
    • Re: Binary tree, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Binary tree, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: Binary tree, user923005
  • Re: Binary tree, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Binary tree, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: Binary tree, user923005
      • Re: Binary tree, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: Binary tree, pete
      • Re: Binary tree, Chris M. Thomasson
  • Re: Binary tree, Chris M. Thomasson
  • Re: Binary tree, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Binary tree, CBFalconer
• The best online shopping site!(www.shoes1998.com), www.shoes1998.com
• why don't you move on to something?, monstabeens
  • Re: why don't you move on to something?, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: why don't you move on to something?, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: why don't you move on to something?, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: why don't you move on to something?, jfbode1029
    • Re: why don't you move on to something?, user923005
      • Re: why don't you move on to something?, Richard Bos
  • Re: why don't you move on to something?, blargg
    • Re: why don't you move on to something?, Golden California Girls
    • Re: why don't you move on to something?, lawrence . jones
      • Re: why don't you move on to something?, Richard Bos
  • Re: why don't you move on to something?, Sjouke Burry
  • Re: why don't you move on to something?, JosephKK
    • Re: why don't you move on to something?, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: why don't you move on to something?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: why don't you move on to something?, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: why don't you move on to something?, Golden California Girls
  • Re: why don't you move on to something?, luser-ex-troll
  • Re: why don't you move on to something?, Preston
• Time usage of a function, mattia
  • Re: Time usage of a function, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Time usage of a function, mattia
• newbie question: fgets() and feof() read last line twice, Andy
  • Re: newbie question: fgets() and feof() read last line twice, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: newbie question: fgets() and feof() read last line twice, Keith Thompson
      • Re: newbie question: fgets() and feof() read last line twice, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: newbie question: fgets() and feof() read last line twice, Andy
  • Re: newbie question: fgets() and feof() read last line twice, Ben Bacarisse
• converting int to float gives nan (int value is definitely non-nan), googlegroups11
  • Re: converting int to float gives nan (int value is definitely non-nan), Richard Heathfield
    • Re: converting int to float gives nan (int value is definitely non-nan), googlegroups11
      • Re: converting int to float gives nan (int value is definitely non-nan), Richard Heathfield
      • Re: converting int to float gives nan (int value is definitely non-nan), Gordon Burditt
      • Re: converting int to float gives nan (int value is definitely non-nan), mark . bluemel
      • Re: converting int to float gives nan (int value is definitely non-nan), nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: converting int to float gives nan (int value is definitely, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: converting int to float gives nan (int value is definitely non-nan), Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: converting int to float gives nan (int value is definitely non-nan), Richard Tobin
• char double doubt, cafetiere
  • Re: char double doubt, Keith Thompson
    • Re: char double doubt, Three Headed Monkey
      • Re: char double doubt, Keith Thompson
      • Re: char double doubt, Richard Bos
  • Re: char double doubt, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: char double doubt, cafetiere
      • Re: char double doubt, James Kuyper
      • Re: char double doubt, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: char double doubt, JosephKK
  • Re: char double doubt, Boon
  • Re: char double doubt, Coffee Pot
    • Re: char double doubt, Keith Thompson
• sizeof and null pointer, Dominik Zaczkowski
  • Re: sizeof and null pointer, pete
    • Re: sizeof and null pointer, Keith Thompson
  • Re: sizeof and null pointer, Default User
  • Re: sizeof and null pointer, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: sizeof and null pointer, Ben Bacarisse
• One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Keith Thompson
      • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, JosephKK
      • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Joe Wright
      • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Han from China
  • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Eric Sosman
    • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, CBFalconer
    • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Richard
    • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, CBFalconer
      • Re: One word to the right extreme and another to the left extreme, Richard Heathfield
• html to text convertor in c, ddk1965
  • Re: html to text convertor in c, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: html to text convertor in c, Richard Bos
    • Re: html to text convertor in c, Keith Thompson
      • Re: html to text convertor in c, Richard Bos
    • Re: html to text convertor in c, Kojak
• HOT SALE SOFTWARES & SPECIAL OFFERS TODAY, teller
• H&S fread/fwrite, arnuld
  • Re: H&S fread/fwrite, mark . bluemel
  • Re: H&S fread/fwrite, pete
  • Re: H&S fread/fwrite, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: H&S fread/fwrite, lawrence . jones
    • Re: H&S fread/fwrite, Keith Thompson
      • Re: H&S fread/fwrite, Richard Bos
      • Re: H&S fread/fwrite, Keith Thompson
    • Re: H&S fread/fwrite, Eric Sosman
  • Re: H&S fread/fwrite, Richard Tobin
• Confusion on typedef functions, arnuld
  • Re: Confusion on typedef functions, pete
  • Re: Confusion on typedef functions, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Confusion on typedef functions, pete
      • Re: Confusion on typedef functions, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Confusion on typedef functions, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Confusion on typedef functions, Ben Bacarisse
• (INT_MIN -1) > 0 equals to 0??, Andy
  • Re: (INT_MIN -1) > 0 equals to 0??, James Dow Allen
    • Re: (INT_MIN -1) > 0 equals to 0??, Andy
      • Re: (INT_MIN -1) > 0 equals to 0??, Willem
      • Re: (INT_MIN -1) > 0 equals to 0??, Andy
      • Re: (INT_MIN -1) > 0 equals to 0??, Keith Thompson
  • Re: (INT_MIN -1) > 0 equals to 0??, gwowen
    • Re: (INT_MIN -1) > 0 equals to 0??, CBFalconer
      • Re: (INT_MIN -1) > 0 equals to 0??, Keith Thompson
      • Re: (INT_MIN -1) > 0 equals to 0??, blargg
• Order of declaration, André Hänsel
  • Re: Order of declaration, Han from China
  • Re: Order of declaration, Nate Eldredge
• I don't understand typedef example, André Hänsel
  • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Han from China
  • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Keith Thompson
  • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Fred
    • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Keith Thompson
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Fred
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Keith Thompson
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, JosephKK
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Keith Thompson
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, David Thompson
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Han from China
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Keith Thompson
  • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Old Wolf
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Keith Thompson
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Old Wolf
  • Re: I don't understand typedef example, André Hänsel
    • Re: I don't understand typedef example, pete
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, André Hänsel
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, pete
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, André Hänsel
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, pete
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Michael Melanson
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Richard Bos
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, pete
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Richard Bos
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Keith Thompson
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, JosephKK
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, pete
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, André Hänsel
      • Re: I don't understand typedef example, Keith Thompson
• kill process after certain seconds., SamuelXiao
  • Re: kill process after certain seconds., Nate Eldredge
  • Re: kill process after certain seconds., throatslasher
    • Re: kill process after certain seconds., SamuelXiao
      • Re: kill process after certain seconds., Nate Eldredge
  • Re: kill process after certain seconds., Kojak
    • Re: kill process after certain seconds., David Thompson
• for loop calculation question, Chad
  • Re: for loop calculation question, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: for loop calculation question, grocery_stocker
• compilation problem, Bill Cunningham
  • Re: compilation problem, Keith Thompson
  • Re: compilation problem, Lew Pitcher
    • Re: compilation problem, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: compilation problem, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: compilation problem, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: compilation problem, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: compilation problem, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: compilation problem, pete
  • Re: compilation problem, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: compilation problem, Han from China
      • Re: compilation problem, Bill Cunningham
      • Re: compilation problem, pete
  • Re: compilation problem, Richard
  • Re: compilation problem, nick_keighley_nospam
• malloc() size problems, voidexp@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: malloc() size problems, jfbode1029
    • Re: malloc() size problems, CBFalconer
      • Re: malloc() size problems, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: malloc() size problems, Richard Bos
      • Re: malloc() size problems, voidexp@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: malloc() size problems, lndresnick
    • Re: malloc() size problems, voidexp@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: malloc() size problems, lndresnick
      • Re: malloc() size problems, voidexp@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: malloc() size problems, lndresnick
      • Re: malloc() size problems, Flash Gordon
      • Re: malloc() size problems, CBFalconer
      • Re: malloc() size problems, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: malloc() size problems, voidexp@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: malloc() size problems, Bartc
• small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, blmblm
  • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Rich Webb
  • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, user923005
  • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Richard Harter
  • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, pete
  • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Bartc
    • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, blargg
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Bartc
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Phil Carmody
    • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, user923005
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Bartc
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, jameskuyper
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, blargg
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, pete
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Bartc
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, blargg
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Bartc
      • Message not available
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, user923005
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, user923005
  • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, blmblm
    • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Golden California Girls
    • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, JosephKK
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: small integer powers -- use pow() or explicit multiplication?, JosephKK
• Socket creation/write/read time, Johann Schlamp
  • Re: Socket creation/write/read time, Anthony Fremont
    • Re: Socket creation/write/read time, Johann Schlamp
      • Re: Socket creation/write/read time, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Socket creation/write/read time, Johann Schlamp
  • Re: Socket creation/write/read time, Keith Thompson
• gcc and pointer-to-arrays, mjkrol
  • Re: gcc and pointer-to-arrays, Ben Bacarisse
• Printing the bitfields, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: Printing the bitfields, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: Printing the bitfields, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, jameskuyper
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, CBFalconer
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, Scott Fluhrer
      • Re: Printing the bitfields, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Printing the bitfields, James Kuyper
  • Re: Printing the bitfields, Eric Sosman
• const pointer, Eric
  • Re: const pointer, Eric
  • Re: const pointer, Richard Bos
    • Re: const pointer, Eric
      • Re: const pointer, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: const pointer, Eric
      • Re: const pointer, James Kuyper
      • Re: const pointer, CBFalconer
      • Re: const pointer, Keith Thompson
• Getting data from a web page back in C, ddk1965
  • Re: Getting data from a web page back in C, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: Getting data from a web page back in C, jacob navia
    • Re: Getting data from a web page back in C, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Getting data from a web page back in C, jacob navia
      • Re: Getting data from a web page back in C, Richard Bos
    • Re: Getting data from a web page back in C, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Getting data from a web page back in C, Wolfgang Draxinger
• *** Great forex resources ***, Verlyn
• wait(), atandt . alex
  • Re: wait(), Ian Collins
• get money, janapandi@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: from asm to C, Bartc
  • Re: from asm to C, user923005
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: from asm to C, Bartc
• unions within an array, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: unions within an array, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: unions within an array, jameskuyper
  • Re: unions within an array, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: unions within an array, Kenneth Brody
    • Re: unions within an array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: unions within an array, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: unions within an array, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: unions within an array, CBFalconer
      • Re: unions within an array, Richard Bos
      • Re: unions within an array, Golden California Girls
      • Re: unions within an array, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: unions within an array, jfbode1029
    • Re: unions within an array, Han from China
      • Re: unions within an array, jfbode1029
      • Re: unions within an array, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: unions within an array, Keith Thompson
• typedef is a storage class specifier ?, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: typedef is a storage class specifier ?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: typedef is a storage class specifier ?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: typedef is a storage class specifier ?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: typedef is a storage class specifier ?, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: typedef is a storage class specifier ?, jameskuyper
      • Re: typedef is a storage class specifier ?, karthikbalaguru
• Re: 64-bit KISS RNGs, lawrence . jones
• Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Nate Eldredge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Ben Pfaff
    • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Keith Thompson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Eric Sosman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Walter Banks
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., pete
      • Message not available
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., lawrence . jones
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Jean-Marc Bourguet
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., lawrence . jones
  • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., jameskuyper
    • Message not available
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., CBFalconer
    • Message not available
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Ben Bacarisse
    • Message not available
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Dik T. Winter
    • Message not available
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., nick_keighley_nospam
    • Message not available
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Bartc
    • Message not available
      • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Richard Bos
  • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., CBFalconer
  • Re: Floating point arithmetic model of C..., Martin Ambuhl
• Cheap Jordan Sneakers, Discount Nike Shox, Discount Nikes, cheap jordans, cheap nike shox,cheap nike dunks
• MAKE OVER $2000 P/M FROM ONLINE FREE MONEY MAKING NETWORK, anderson
• memory pointer tricks, loudking
  • Re: memory pointer tricks, Eric Sosman
  • Re: memory pointer tricks, James Kuyper
  • Re: memory pointer tricks, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: memory pointer tricks, Eric Sosman
      • Re: memory pointer tricks, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: memory pointer tricks, Han from China
    • Re: memory pointer tricks, Richard
  • Re: memory pointer tricks, Richard Bos
  • Re: memory pointer tricks, lawrence . jones
• Indian Housewife ... Newly Married .. Sexiest Beauty, Sneha123
• Why this doesnt work with Visual studio..., djuro . tost
  • Re: Why this doesnt work with Visual studio..., Ulrich Eckhardt
  • Re: Why this doesnt work with Visual studio..., ramspite
  • Re: Why this doesnt work with Visual studio..., Keith Thompson
  • Re: Why this doesnt work with Visual studio..., Richard Bos
  • Re: Why this doesnt work with Visual studio..., jfbode1029
  • Re: Why this doesnt work with Visual studio..., CBFalconer
    • Re: Why this doesnt work with Visual studio..., Ian Collins
      • Re: Why this doesnt work with Visual studio..., Richard
• Calculating storage alignment, Darren Cubitt
  • Re: Calculating storage alignment, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Calculating storage alignment, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Calculating storage alignment, Darren Cubitt
      • Re: Calculating storage alignment, Darren Cubitt
      • Re: Calculating storage alignment, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Calculating storage alignment, Darren Cubitt
      • Re: Calculating storage alignment, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Calculating storage alignment, CBFalconer
  • Re: Calculating storage alignment, gw7rib
  • Re: Calculating storage alignment, Chris M. Thomasson
• Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, pradeep
  • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Darren Cubitt
    • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, pradeep
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Albert
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Albert
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Albert
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Albert
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, James Kuyper
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Albert
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, jameskuyper
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Albert
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Albert
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Kevin D . Quitt
  • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Flash Gordon
  • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Message not available
      • Re: Pascal Triangle doubt - Help!, Jens Thoms Toerring
• Re: Matrix multiplication code, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Matrix multiplication code, user923005
  • Re: Matrix multiplication code, Kojak
    • Re: Matrix multiplication code, user923005
      • Re: Matrix multiplication code, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: Matrix multiplication code, Kojak
• META: relax topicality to squeeze the spam?, luser-ex-troll
  • Re: META: relax topicality to squeeze the spam?, Han from China
    • Re: META: relax topicality to squeeze the spam?, luser-ex-troll
  • Re: META: relax topicality to squeeze the spam?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: META: relax topicality to squeeze the spam?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: relax topicality to squeeze the spam?, Chris M. Thomasson
  • Re: META: relax topicality to squeeze the spam?, Richard Bos
  • Re: META: relax topicality to squeeze the spam?, Default User
  • Re: META: relax topicality to squeeze the spam?, Tristan Miller
    • Re: META: relax topicality to squeeze the spam?, luser-ex-troll
• Re: "+=" operator, comments appreciated, thanks!, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: "+=" operator, comments appreciated, thanks!, Ben Bacarisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "+=" operator, comments appreciated, thanks!, Keith Thompson
    • Re: "+=" operator, comments appreciated, thanks!, J. J. Farrell
  • Re: "+=" operator, comments appreciated, thanks!, CBFalconer
    • Re: "+=" operator, comments appreciated, thanks!, Golden California Girls
      • Re: "+=" operator, comments appreciated, thanks!, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: "+=" operator, comments appreciated, thanks!, Golden California Girls
      • Re: "+=" operator, comments appreciated, thanks!, Mark McIntyre
• www.stefsclothes.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes.free shipping!, nike shoes
• "Portable" C compilers?, Albert
  • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Mark Hobley
    • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Albert
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Mark Hobley
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Jean-Marc L.
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Marek Kubica
  • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Ian Collins
    • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Albert
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Tristan Miller
  • Message not available
    • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Albert
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Ian Collins
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Albert
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, James Kuyper
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Albert
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, James Kuyper
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Albert
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, James Kuyper
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, pete
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, James Kuyper
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, pete
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Albert
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard Bos
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, CBFalconer
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, CBFalconer
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, CBFalconer
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, CBFalconer
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard Bos
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Albert
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, CBFalconer
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, CBFalconer
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, CBFalconer
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Han from China
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, James Kuyper
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, jameskuyper
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, JosephKK
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Han from China
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard Bos
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, rio
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Rafael
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Han from China
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, James Kuyper
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, CBFalconer
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard Bos
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, James Kuyper
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard Bos
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Old Wolf
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Rich Webb
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Richard Bos
  • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, blargg
  • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, CBFalconer
  • Re: "Portable" C compilers?, Albert
• Copying clipboard into string, Jason
  • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Kojak
    • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Kojak
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Jason
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Han from China
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Richard Bos
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Richard
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Han from China
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Kojak
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Larry Gates
  • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Copying clipboard into string, jacob navia
    • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Richard Bos
    • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Han from China
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, pete
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Han from China
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Han from China
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Richard
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Richard
  • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Bartc
  • Re: Copying clipboard into string, pete
    • Re: Copying clipboard into string, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Copying clipboard into string, luser-ex-troll
  • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Luuk
    • Re: Copying clipboard into string, Jason
• total array size limitations?, glennklockwood
  • Re: total array size limitations?, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: total array size limitations?, glennklockwood
  • Re: total array size limitations?, Bartc
  • Re: total array size limitations?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: total array size limitations?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: total array size limitations?, CBFalconer
  • Re: total array size limitations?, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: total array size limitations?, CBFalconer
    • Re: total array size limitations?, Richard Harter
      • Re: total array size limitations?, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: total array size limitations?, CBFalconer
      • Re: total array size limitations?, Richard Harter
      • Re: total array size limitations?, CBFalconer
      • Re: total array size limitations?, Richard Harter
      • Re: total array size limitations?, nick_keighley_nospam
• Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, Jujitsu Lizard
  • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, James Kuyper
    • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, jameskuyper
      • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, jameskuyper
      • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, david
    • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, blargg
      • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, david
  • Re: Help on Mistake With Function Pointers, Anthony Fremont
• Nike dunk high shoes wholesale\retail, dfcdsf
• define question, david
  • Re: define question, Keith Thompson
    • Re: define question, david
      • Re: define question, Hansjoerg Lipp
      • Re: define question, david
      • Re: define question, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: define question, Richard Bos
      • Re: define question, Keith Thompson
      • Re: define question, david
      • Re: define question, CBFalconer
      • Re: define question, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: define question, Keith Thompson
      • Re: define question, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: define question, Richard
      • Re: define question, Han from China
      • Re: define question, Richard Bos
  • Re: define question, J. J. Farrell
    • Re: define question, Keith Thompson
• Getopt: Getting input to a string after an option, orgthingy
  • Re: Getopt: Getting input to a string after an option, Antoninus Twink
• int pointers & characters !!, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: int pointers & characters !!, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: int pointers & characters !!, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: int pointers & characters !!, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: int pointers & characters !!, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: int pointers & characters !!, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: int pointers & characters !!, James Kuyper
      • Re: int pointers & characters !!, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: int pointers & characters !!, Han from China
  • Re: int pointers & characters !!, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: int pointers & characters !!, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: int pointers & characters !!, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: int pointers & characters !!, Bartc
  • Re: int pointers & characters !!, Darren Cubitt
    • Re: int pointers & characters !!, David Thompson
  • Re: int pointers & characters !!, Eric Sosman
  • Re: int pointers & characters !!, TonyMc
  • Re: int pointers & characters !!, CBFalconer
    • Re: int pointers & characters !!, Antoninus Twink
    • Re: int pointers & characters !!, Bartc
• earn more money in 2009 and also we get free air ticket for your vacation, lily
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • earn more money in 2009 and also we get free air ticket for your vacation, ramya
• I don't get it, mattia
  • Re: I don't get it, Keith Thompson
    • Re: I don't get it, mattia
    • Re: I don't get it, Jack Klein
      • Re: I don't get it, Keith Thompson
      • Re: I don't get it, blargg
  • Re: I don't get it, Han from China
  • Re: I don't get it, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: I don't get it, blargg
  • Re: I don't get it, Martin Ambuhl
• Question about GNU make, Peter Mueller
  • Re: Question about GNU make, Fred
    • Re: Question about GNU make, Richard
  • Re: Question about GNU make, Antoninus Twink
    • Re: Question about GNU make, Peter Mueller
• Re: Matrix multiplication algorithm not working correctly, Dik T. Winter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Matrix multiplication algorithm not working correctly, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Matrix multiplication algorithm not working correctly, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Matrix multiplication algorithm not working correctly, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: Matrix multiplication algorithm not working correctly, David Thompson
  • Re: Matrix multiplication algorithm not working correctly, Bartc
  • Re: Matrix multiplication algorithm not working correctly, Kojak
• History of 'const' grammar, Wolfgang Draxinger
• Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Francois Grieu
  • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Boon
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Jens Thoms Toerring
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Old Wolf
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, blargg
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Han from China
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, blargg
  • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Chetan
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Chetan
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Tim Woodall
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Eric Sosman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Francois Grieu
    • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: Can this mostly useless while loop be optimized out?, Chetan
• Knowing the end of an array of char*, Eric
  • Re: Knowing the end of an array of char*, Jens Thoms Toerring
    • Re: Knowing the end of an array of char*, blargg
  • Re: Knowing the end of an array of char*, Sjouke Burry
    • Re: Knowing the end of an array of char*, Eric
      • Re: Knowing the end of an array of char*, James Kuyper
    • Re: Knowing the end of an array of char*, James Kuyper
• Memory consumption, MN
  • Re: Memory consumption, Edwin van den Oetelaar
  • Re: Memory consumption, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: Memory consumption, Joachim Schmitz
    • Re: Memory consumption, Antoninus Twink
    • Re: Memory consumption, CBFalconer
      • Re: Memory consumption, Han from China
      • Re: Memory consumption, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Memory consumption, Han from China
      • Re: Memory consumption, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Memory consumption, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Memory consumption, Han from China
      • Re: Memory consumption, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Memory consumption, Richard
      • Re: Memory consumption, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Memory consumption, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Memory consumption, Joachim Schmitz
      • Re: Memory consumption, Han from China
      • Re: Memory consumption, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Memory consumption, CBFalconer
      • Re: Memory consumption, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Memory consumption, Han from China
• Re: carriage return and fprintf, John F. Eldredge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: carriage return and fprintf, Han from China
• Memory reallocation, mattia
  • Re: Memory reallocation, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: Memory reallocation, CBFalconer
    • Re: Memory reallocation, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Memory reallocation, CBFalconer
      • Re: Memory reallocation, mattia
      • Re: Memory reallocation, Richard
      • Re: Memory reallocation, mattia
    • Re: Memory reallocation, Han from China
      • Re: Memory reallocation, Chris M. Thomasson
      • Re: Memory reallocation, CBFalconer
      • Re: Memory reallocation, Han from China
• Online Jobs - How To Make Money Online Without Spending Money, girl_money
• Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Richard Bos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Richard Bos
• gets(), jacob navia
  • Re: gets(), George Peter Staplin
    • Re: gets(), Keith Thompson
  • Re: gets(), Curtis Dyer
  • Re: gets(), Richard Heathfield
  • Re: gets(), Phil Carmody
  • Re: gets(), Keith Thompson
• Re: psych question about ignoring people, Kenny McCormack
• success in career, PINK
• Questionnaire, pkuphenix
• Pointer variable Address, pavunkumar
  • Re: Pointer variable Address, George Peter Staplin
  • Re: Pointer variable Address, H Vlems
    • Re: Pointer variable Address, James Kuyper
  • Re: Pointer variable Address, James Kuyper
  • Re: Pointer variable Address, Nelu
• Can I allocate an array on the stack?, luser-ex-troll
  • Re: Can I allocate an array on the stack?, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Can I allocate an array on the stack?, luser-ex-troll
• Re-declaration !!, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: Re-declaration !!, Falcon Kirtaran
    • Re: Re-declaration !!, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: Re-declaration !!, Chris Dollin
  • Re: Re-declaration !!, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: Re-declaration !!, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: Re-declaration !!, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Re-declaration !!, blargg
  • Re: Re-declaration !!, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Re-declaration !!, nick_keighley_nospam
• On the development of C, jacob navia
  • Re: On the development of C, user923005
    • Re: On the development of C, Eric Sosman
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, jameskuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: On the development of C, William Pursell
      • Re: On the development of C, Rui Maciel
      • Re: On the development of C, Daniel Pirch
      • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
    • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, user923005
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, Chris M. Thomasson
    • Re: On the development of C, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
    • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Bartc
    • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, user923005
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, Ian Collins
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, Ian Collins
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
  • Re: On the development of C, jameskuyper
    • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, Golden California Girls
      • Re: On the development of C, jameskuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, user923005
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, lawrence . jones
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, user923005
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, James Kuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, jfbode1029
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, user923005
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: On the development of C, Eric Sosman
      • Re: On the development of C, lawrence . jones
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, user923005
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Eric Sosman
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
      • Re: On the development of C, Chris McDonald
      • Re: On the development of C, Eric Sosman
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, Eric Sosman
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, Eric Sosman
      • gets() (was Re: On the development of C), Kenneth Brody
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, Golden California Girls
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, user923005
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, Phil Carmody
      • Re: On the development of C, Chris McDonald
      • Re: On the development of C, Eric Sosman
      • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
      • Re: On the development of C, Chris McDonald
      • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
      • Re: On the development of C, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: On the development of C, Golden California Girls
      • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Tobin
      • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
      • Re: On the development of C, Phil Carmody
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Default User
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, Phil Carmody
      • Re: On the development of C, Tim Rentsch
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, user923005
      • Re: On the development of C, Kojak
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard
      • Re: On the development of C, Phil Carmody
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Golden California Girls
      • Re: On the development of C, Phil Carmody
      • Re: On the development of C, Anand Hariharan
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, lawrence . jones
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, James Kuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, jameskuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, jameskuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, jameskuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, James Kuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, jameskuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, user923005
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, rio
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, roctheengy
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, roctheengy
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, blargg
      • Re: On the development of C, qarnos
      • Re: On the development of C, roctheengy
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, lawrence . jones
      • Re: On the development of C, Golden California Girls
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
    • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
    • Re: On the development of C, lawrence . jones
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
  • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, jfbode1029
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, jameskuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: On the development of C, jameskuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, lawrence . jones
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Bartc
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, Bartc
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, Bartc
      • Re: On the development of C, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: On the development of C, Bartc
      • Re: On the development of C, Eric Sosman
      • Re: On the development of C, Bartc
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard
      • Re: On the development of C, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, Golden California Girls
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, rio
      • Re: On the development of C, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, lawrence . jones
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, Phil Carmody
      • Re: On the development of C, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
      • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: On the development of C, lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
    • Re: On the development of C, lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: On the development of C, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: On the development of C, George Peter Staplin
    • Re: On the development of C, CBFalconer
    • Re: On the development of C, Tony
  • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
  • Re: On the development of C, Tony
  • Re: On the development of C, Tony
    • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Preston
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, James Kuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, James Kuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: On the development of C, Joe Wright
      • Re: On the development of C, jacob navia
      • Re: On the development of C, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
      • Re: On the development of C, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: On the development of C, Han from China
      • Re: On the development of C, Keith Thompson
      • Re: On the development of C, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: On the development of C, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: On the development of C, James Kuyper
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: On the development of C, Ian Collins
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: On the development of C, Bartc
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, Tony
      • Re: On the development of C, Walter Banks
      • Re: On the development of C, Richard Bos
• what is a subexpression ?, Francis Moreau
  • Re: what is a subexpression ?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: what is a subexpression ?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: what is a subexpression ?, Francis Moreau
      • Re: what is a subexpression ?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: what is a subexpression ?, pete
• PHP, think 4 rohit
  • Re: PHP, Kojak
  • Re: PHP, Tristan Miller
  • Re: PHP, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: PHP, Han from China
  • Re: PHP, CBFalconer
    • Re: PHP, Keith Thompson
      • Re: PHP, CBFalconer
      • Re: PHP, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: PHP, CBFalconer
      • Re: PHP, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: PHP, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: PHP, nick_keighley_nospam
• Same struct, different sizes., Control Freq
  • Re: Same struct, different sizes., Active Volcano
  • Re: Same struct, different sizes., Eric Sosman
  • Re: Same struct, different sizes., Ben Pfaff
  • Re: Same struct, different sizes., blargg
    • Re: Same struct, different sizes., Control Freq
      • Re: Same struct, different sizes., JosephKK
• Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", David Thompson
  • Message not available
    • Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Richard Bos
  • Message not available
    • Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Kenny McCormack
      • Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China
      • Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", nick_keighley_nospam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Peter Nilsson
    • Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", CBFalconer
    • Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China
• Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, David Thompson
• Re: How often do you read the C standard?, David Thompson
  • Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Han from China
• OIOIC how about? Kindly give me your advice. OIOIC is a completely new object-oriented technology for the C programming language., pervise . zhao
• Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ike Naar
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ike Naar
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ike Naar
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ike Naar
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ike Naar
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, CBFalconer
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ike Naar
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, CBFalconer
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, CBFalconer
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Harald van Dijk
  • Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Mark McIntyre
• 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, Keith Thompson
  • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, Jujitsu Lizard
    • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, Daniel Pirch
      • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, Jujitsu Lizard
      • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, blargg
    • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, Phil Carmody
      • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, Han from China
  • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: 3 usages of same name in different contexts !!, karthikbalaguru
• [META] How to keep a clc regular busy, Platonic Solid
  • Re: [META] How to keep a clc regular busy, Larry Gates
    • Re: [META] How to keep a clc regular busy, Mark Wooding
  • Re: [META] How to keep a clc regular busy, Kenneth Brody
    • Re: [META] How to keep a clc regular busy, jellybean stonerfish
      • Re: [META] How to keep a clc regular busy, Richard Bos
    • Re: [META] How to keep a clc regular busy, blargg
• Make money fast., anon
• Re: c program helps, Lew Pitcher
  • Re: c program helps, Richard Heathfield
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: c program helps, Keith Thompson
  • Re: c program helps, pete
  • Re: c program helps, nick_keighley_nospam
• killfile-Chucky flood test (x5) 10, CBFalconer
• killfile-Chucky flood test (x5) 9, CBFalconer
• killfile-Chucky flood test (x5) 8, CBFalconer
• killfile-Chucky flood test (x5) 7, CBFalconer
• killfile-Chucky flood test (x5) 6, CBFalconer
• killfile-Chucky flood test (x5) 5, CBFalconer
• killfile-Chucky flood test (x5) 4, CBFalconer
• killfile-Chucky flood test (x5) 3, CBFalconer
• killfile-Chucky flood test (x5) 2, CBFalconer
• killfile-Chucky flood test (x5) 1, CBFalconer
• printf and extended chars, david
  • Re: printf and extended chars, Luuk
    • Re: printf and extended chars, david
      • Re: printf and extended chars, Luuk
• testing 10, CBFalconer
  • Re: testing 10, Luuk
    • Re: testing 10, James Kuyper
      • Re: testing 10, Luuk
      • Re: testing 10, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: testing 10, Luuk
      • Re: testing 10, Han from China
      • Re: testing 10, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: testing 10, Rich Webb
      • Re: testing 10, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: testing 10, Larry Gates
      • Re: testing 10, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: testing 10, Richard
      • Re: testing 10, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: testing 10, CBFalconer
      • Re: testing 10, Golden California Girls
      • [OT] Re: testing 10, Falcon Kirtaran
      • Re: [OT] Re: testing 10, CBFalconer
• testing 5, CBFalconer
• testing 4, CBFalconer
• testing 3, CBFalconer
• testing 2, CBFalconer
• testing 1, CBFalconer
• How it all ends..., CBFalconer
• correct my code your, CBFalconer
  • Re: correct my code your, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: correct my code your, Ben Pfaff
    • Re: correct my code your, Richard Heathfield
      • [ot]Re: correct my code your, pete
    • Re: correct my code your, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: correct my code your, CBFalconer
• flushing it properly, CBFalconer
  • Re: flushing it properly, Kenny McCormack
• calculate the right lines, CBFalconer
• print the next line, CBFalconer
• pointer variables, CBFalconer
  • Re: pointer variables, CBFalconer
• *++p vs ++*p, Francis Moreau
  • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Ralf Damaschke
    • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Francis Moreau
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Ralf Damaschke
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Francis Moreau
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Ralf Damaschke
  • Re: *++p vs ++*p, CBFalconer
    • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Bartc
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: *++p vs ++*p, CBFalconer
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Golden California Girls
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Richard Bos
  • Re: *++p vs ++*p, James Kuyper
    • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Francis Moreau
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, James Kuyper
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Francis Moreau
  • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Francis Moreau
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, James Kuyper
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Richard Tobin
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Francis Moreau
  • Message not available
    • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Richard
  • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Francis Moreau
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Ike Naar
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Francis Moreau
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Francis Moreau
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Han from China
  • Message not available
    • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Phil Carmody
  • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Han from China
  • Re: *++p vs ++*p, Andrey Tarasevich
• comp.lang.c pest report (2), CBFalconer
• comp.lang.c pest report, CBFalconer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • comp.lang.c pest report, CBFalconer
    • Re: comp.lang.c pest report, CBFalconer
• Question for Richard Heathfield, Everyman
  • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Mark McIntyre
    • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Richard
    • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Old Wolf
      • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Old Wolf
      • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Han from China
  • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, jfbode1029
    • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Han from China
    • Re: Question for Richard Heathfield, Han from China
• Re: What does this do?, Golden California Girls
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What does this do?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: What does this do?, CBFalconer
      • Re: What does this do?, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: What does this do?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: What does this do?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: What does this do?, Phil Carmody
• Changing the base address of an array !!, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: Changing the base address of an array !!, James Kuyper
    • Re: Changing the base address of an array !!, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: Changing the base address of an array !!, Barry Schwarz
  • Message not available
    • Re: Changing the base address of an array !!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Changing the base address of an array !!, James Kuyper
      • Re: Changing the base address of an array !!, karthikbalaguru
  • Message not available
    • Re: Changing the base address of an array !!, karthikbalaguru
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats
  • Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats
• 《 OIOIC Primer 》the Second Edition for the English language. Welcome to download !, pervise . zhao
• SHOES, AF1, PRADA, UGG, JORDAN, GUCCI, NIKE, MAX $33, sdsad
• conservative static region allocator..., Chris M. Thomasson
  • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Malcolm McLean
    • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Flash Gordon
    • Re: conservative static region allocator..., nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: conservative static region allocator..., pete
      • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Richard Bos
      • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Richard Heathfield
      • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Walter Banks
      • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Eric Sosman
      • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Bartc
      • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Richard
      • Re: conservative static region allocator..., CBFalconer
    • Re: conservative static region allocator..., Chris M. Thomasson
• $$Nike dunk high shoes wholesale\retail, two
• Laguna Beach Mens Jeans - Discount Laguna Beach Jeans, wangguizhe
• structure without any data, Tagore
  • Re: structure without any data, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: structure without any data, Tagore
      • Re: structure without any data, James Kuyper
      • Re: structure without any data, Barry Schwarz
• Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, C . J . Clegg
  • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, James Kuyper
    • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, James Kuyper
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, luser-ex-troll
  • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Anthony Fremont
  • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Mark Wooding
  • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, blargg
  • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
    • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, pete
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Jack Klein
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, JosephKK
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Han from China
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Richard Harter
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Richard
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Richard Harter
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, JosephKK
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Willem
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Han from China
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Han from China
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Jack Klein
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Han from China
    • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, qarnos
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, qarnos
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Richard Harter
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Copying from one struct to another, simple assignment?, CBFalconer
• pass 2 dimensional array to sort func - segmentation fault?, drjon
  • Re: pass 2 dimensional array to sort func - segmentation fault?, Ike Naar
    • Re: pass 2 dimensional array to sort func - segmentation fault?, drjon
      • Re: pass 2 dimensional array to sort func - segmentation fault?, Ike Naar
• C is a terrible intermediate language, Tony
  • Re: C is a terrible intermediate language, Keith Thompson
  • Re: C is a terrible intermediate language, lawrence . jones
  • Re: C is a terrible intermediate language, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: C is a terrible intermediate language, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: C is a terrible intermediate language, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: C is a terrible intermediate language, Jack Klein
    • Re: C is a terrible intermediate language, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: C is a terrible intermediate language, Chris Dollin
• Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Tony
  • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Tony
      • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Rich Webb
    • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Anthony Fremont
  • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Han from China
    • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., qarnos
      • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Golden California Girls
    • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., blargg
      • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Mike Wahler
      • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Richard Bos
  • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Phil Carmody
  • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Bartc
  • Re: Null-terminated strings: the final analysis., Jack Klein
• Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, James Kuyper
  • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Bartc
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, pete
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, James Kuyper
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Bartc
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Willem
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, James Kuyper
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, pete
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, James Kuyper
      • Message not available
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Bartc
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Bartc
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Harter
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Harter
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, jacob navia
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Mark McIntyre
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Ike Naar
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, pete
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, pete
  • Re: Do we need to continue to include stdio.h in C files ?, nick_keighley_nospam
• Whitespace before opening paren in function call?, C . J . Clegg
  • Re: Whitespace before opening paren in function call?, pete
  • Re: Whitespace before opening paren in function call?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Whitespace before opening paren in function call?, Kaz Kylheku
• Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, C . J . Clegg
• Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, James Kuyper
  • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Han from China
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, badger
    • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Han from China
  • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Richard Tobin
    • Message not available
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Keith Thompson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Keith Thompson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, jameskuyper
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Message not available
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Richard Bos
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Han from China
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Mark Wooding
    • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Han from China
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Richard Bos
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Han from China
  • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Han from China
  • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, CBFalconer
    • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Richard Bos
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Richard Bos
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Richard Bos
    • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Han from China
    • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Richard
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Golden California Girls
  • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Han from China
  • Re: Some sort of weird round off error -- please help!, Richard Tobin
• Some language not implemented in C?, neoedmund
  • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, neoedmund
  • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, user923005
  • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Tristan Miller
  • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Chris Dollin
  • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, mark . bluemel
  • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Anthony Fremont
  • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Bartc
  • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Mark Wooding
    • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Marek Kubica
  • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Gene
    • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Richard Bos
      • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Some language not implemented in C?, Sjouke Burry
• about c, jeevan
  • Re: about c, Han from China
    • Re: about c, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: about c, user923005
      • Re: about c, Keith Thompson
      • Re: about c, Eric Sosman
      • Re: about c, user923005
  • Re: about c, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: about c, Curtis Dyer
      • Re: about c, Willem
      • Re: about c, Curtis Dyer
  • Re: about c, user923005
    • Re: about c, Richard Bos
  • Re: about c, Tristan Miller
  • Re: about c, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: about c, Sjouke Burry
• Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, JosephKK
  • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, user923005
    • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, JosephKK
      • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Walter Banks
  • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Phil Carmody
    • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, CBFalconer
      • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Richard Bos
      • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Dik T. Winter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, JosephKK
  • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Rui Maciel
    • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, CBFalconer
    • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, user923005
      • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Richard Harter
      • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Willem
      • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, blmblm
    • Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Richard Heathfield
• Work at Home - Make $ 50 Per Hour , 100% Guaranteed, nammo4me@xxxxxxxxx
• Getting source file from the object file, pavunkumar
  • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Getting source file from the object file, pavunkumar
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Tristan Miller
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Richard Bos
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Chris Dollin
  • Re: Getting source file from the object file, user923005
    • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, user923005
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, user923005
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, JosephKK
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, James Kuyper
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, JosephKK
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, user923005
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Richard Bos
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, user923005
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, crisgoogle
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Richard Bos
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, JosephKK
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, JosephKK
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, James Kuyper
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, JosephKK
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, James Kuyper
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, jameskuyper
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Han from China
      • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Getting source file from the object file, Michael Angelo Ravera
• floating-point literal cannot appear in a constant-expression, TimC
  • Re: floating-point literal cannot appear in a constant-expression, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: floating-point literal cannot appear in a constant-expression, Mark L Pappin
  • Re: floating-point literal cannot appear in a constant-expression, Martin Ambuhl
    • Re: floating-point literal cannot appear in a constant-expression, TimC
  • Re: floating-point literal cannot appear in a constant-expression, Han from China
  • Re: floating-point literal cannot appear in a constant-expression, CBFalconer
• is it possible to cast a one dimensional array to a two dimensional array?, SamL
  • Re: is it possible to cast a one dimensional array to a two dimensional array?, James Kuyper
    • Re: is it possible to cast a one dimensional array to a two dimensional array?, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: is it possible to cast a one dimensional array to a two dimensional array?, James Kuyper
    • Re: is it possible to cast a one dimensional array to a two dimensional array?, David Thompson
  • Message not available
    • Re: is it possible to cast a one dimensional array to a two dimensional array?, SamL
• maps and unions, Larry Gates
  • Re: maps and unions, Ben Pfaff
  • Re: maps and unions, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: maps and unions, Larry Gates
  • Re: maps and unions, Thad Smith
  • Re: maps and unions, Chris Dollin
    • Re: maps and unions, Larry Gates
      • Re: maps and unions, Ben Pfaff
      • Re: maps and unions, Larry Gates
      • Re: maps and unions, Richard Bos
      • Re: maps and unions, Larry Gates
      • Re: maps and unions, David Thompson
      • Re: maps and unions, Richard Bos
      • Re: maps and unions, Franken Sense
      • Re: maps and unions, Chris Dollin
      • Re: maps and unions, James Kuyper
      • Re: maps and unions, Larry Gates
      • Re: maps and unions, Richard Bos
      • Re: maps and unions, Larry Gates
      • Re: maps and unions, Richard Bos
      • Re: maps and unions, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: maps and unions, Larry Gates
      • Re: maps and unions, Richard Bos
      • Re: maps and unions, Larry Gates
• Simulate C++ Exception handling with setjmp/longjmp?, Bo Yang
  • Re: Simulate C++ Exception handling with setjmp/longjmp?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Simulate C++ Exception handling with setjmp/longjmp?, Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
      • Re: Simulate C++ Exception handling with setjmp/longjmp?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Simulate C++ Exception handling with setjmp/longjmp?, Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
      • Re: Simulate C++ Exception handling with setjmp/longjmp?, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Simulate C++ Exception handling with setjmp/longjmp?, Tony
    • Re: Simulate C++ Exception handling with setjmp/longjmp?, Daniel Pirch
• exponential moving average, Bill Cunningham
  • Re: exponential moving average, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: exponential moving average, Keith Thompson
      • Re: exponential moving average, Bill Cunningham
• Re: Benign typedef definition, Spiros Bousbouras
  • Re: Benign typedef definition, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Benign typedef definition, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Benign typedef definition, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Benign typedef definition, Kaz Kylheku
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Benign typedef definition, Mark Wooding
    • Re: Benign typedef definition, David Thompson
• Re: How could the unknown number of arguments been passed to printf, Ben Bacarisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How could the unknown number of arguments been passed to printf, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: How could the unknown number of arguments been passed to printf, Ben Pfaff
• Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch
• Question on finding the caller function., Ravi_G
  • Re: Question on finding the caller function., James Kuyper
    • Re: Question on finding the caller function., Mark Wooding
      • Re: Question on finding the caller function., Keith Thompson
      • Re: Question on finding the caller function., Ravi_G
      • Re: Question on finding the caller function. Getting a it further OT, JosephKK
  • Re: Question on finding the caller function., Nate Eldredge
  • Re: Question on finding the caller function., hal2k
    • Re: Question on finding the caller function., Keith Thompson
    • Re: Question on finding the caller function., jameskuyper
  • Re: Question on finding the caller function., ionic
    • Re: Question on finding the caller function., Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Question on finding the caller function., Ravi_G
    • Re: Question on finding the caller function., David Thompson
• schnell gutes geld verdienen,richtig geld machen,nebenberuflich geld verdienen,drakensang geld machen,internet geld verdienen kann,, blackcat66612
• Re: Help with this little line of code please..., Thomas Maier-Komor
  • Message not available
    • Re: Help with this little line of code please..., Thomas Maier-Komor
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Help with this little line of code please..., James Kuyper
  • Re: Help with this little line of code please..., Eric Sosman
    • Re: Help with this little line of code please..., James Kuyper
    • Re: Help with this little line of code please..., Keith Thompson
• Re: Simple math parser ?, Guillaume Dargaud
• CALCULAT your love percentage on Mobile for FREE, jeremybaar@xxxxxxxxx
• Consideration on pointer declarations, Starman
  • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Shiyou Wang
  • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Starman
      • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Bartc
      • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, JosephKK
      • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, JosephKK
      • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, JosephKK
    • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Richard Harter
      • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Bartc
      • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Bartc
      • [OT] Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, pete
  • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, John Bode
    • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, Starman
  • Re: Consideration on pointer declarations, qarnos
• How read out own IP-address?, R. Grasbon
  • Re: How read out own IP-address?, Shulei Zhu
  • Re: How read out own IP-address?, user923005
• Question about the usual arithmetic conversion, Francis Moreau
  • Re: Question about the usual arithmetic conversion, Mark Wooding
    • Re: Question about the usual arithmetic conversion, Franck Bui-Huu
    • Re: Question about the usual arithmetic conversion, Francis Moreau
  • Re: Question about the usual arithmetic conversion, Ike Naar
    • Re: Question about the usual arithmetic conversion, Francis Moreau
  • Re: Question about the usual arithmetic conversion, James Kuyper
    • Re: Question about the usual arithmetic conversion, Francis Moreau
      • Re: Question about the usual arithmetic conversion, James Kuyper
      • Re: Question about the usual arithmetic conversion, Tim Rentsch
• Christian Louboutin Boots - Fashion, wangguizhe
• Groups, pavunkumar
  • Re: Groups, nick_keighley_nospam
• why address of pointer is machine dependent?, henry
  • Re: why address of pointer is machine dependent?, Stephen Sprunk
  • Re: why address of pointer is machine dependent?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: why address of pointer is machine dependent?, hal2k
    • Re: why address of pointer is machine dependent?, henry
      • Re: why address of pointer is machine dependent?, Keith Thompson
      • Re: why address of pointer is machine dependent?, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: why address of pointer is machine dependent?, Richard
      • Re: why address of pointer is machine dependent?, Default User
  • Re: why address of pointer is machine dependent?, blargg
• Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Phlip
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Kenneth Brody
    • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Keith Thompson
    • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., jacob navia
      • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., jameskuyper
  • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Pascal J. Bourguignon
    • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Ben Pfaff
  • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Han from China
    • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., luser-ex-troll
      • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Ike Naar
  • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Harald van Dijk
    • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., CBFalconer
      • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Harald van Dijk
      • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Richard
      • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Harald van Dijk
      • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., CBFalconer
      • Re: pre-requestie for learning C..., Richard Bos
• ?Searching for Happiness, muslim
• wireless networking library, eminhanif
  • Re: wireless networking library, user923005
  • Re: wireless networking library, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: wireless networking library, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: wireless networking library, nick_keighley_nospam
• Can I still use truss to check function call of multithread applications?, Carfield Yim
  • Re: Can I still use truss to check function call of multithread applications?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Can I still use truss to check function call of multithread applications?, Carfield Yim
• Unary +, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: Unary +, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Unary +, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: Unary +, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Unary +, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Unary +, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Unary +, blargg
      • Message not available
      • Re: Unary +, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Unary +, blargg
      • Re: Unary +, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Unary +, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Unary +, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Unary +, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Unary +, CBFalconer
      • Re: Unary +, pete
      • Re: Unary +, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Unary +, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Unary +, pete
      • Re: Unary +, CBFalconer
      • Re: Unary +, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Unary +, CBFalconer
      • Re: Unary +, blargg
      • Re: Unary +, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Unary +, James Kuyper
      • Re: Unary +, blargg
      • Re: Unary +, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Unary +, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Unary +, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Unary +, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Unary +, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Unary +, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Unary +, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Unary +, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Unary +, Han from China
    • Re: Unary +, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Unary +, Richard Harter
      • Re: Unary +, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: Unary +, blargg
• (WWW.DUDES-MALL.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50, dudesmallmike031@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • (WWW.DUDES-MALL.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50, dudesmallmike044@xxxxxxxxx
• Problem With Loop And Array, John
  • Re: Problem With Loop And Array, Scott Fluhrer
    • Re: Problem With Loop And Array, John
  • Re: Problem With Loop And Array, Lew Pitcher
  • Re: Problem With Loop And Array, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Problem With Loop And Array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Problem With Loop And Array, blargg
      • Re: Problem With Loop And Array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Problem With Loop And Array, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Problem With Loop And Array, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Problem With Loop And Array, pete
• Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, jacob navia
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Eric Sosman
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, pete
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, pete
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Walter Banks
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, luser-ex-troll
  • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Mark McIntyre
  • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, CBFalconer
    • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Richard Harter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Richard Harter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Richard Harter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, pete
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, James Kuyper
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, James Kuyper
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, James Kuyper
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, James Kuyper
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Richard Harter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, James Kuyper
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, James Kuyper
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, CBFalconer
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, user923005
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, James Kuyper
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Richard Harter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, James Kuyper
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, user923005
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, JosephKK
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Han from China
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Richard Bos
    • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, CBFalconer
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Value of "e" in the C log() function, Richard Heathfield
• Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Guilbert STABILO
• The Standard C Library torrent file password, nix
  • Re: The Standard C Library torrent file password, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: The Standard C Library torrent file password, Kojak
  • Re: The Standard C Library torrent file password, CBFalconer
• Novice array size, Francogrex
  • Re: Novice array size, Kojak
    • Re: Novice array size, Francogrex
      • Re: Novice array size, Kojak
      • Re: Novice array size, Francogrex
      • Re: Novice array size, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Novice array size, Kojak
    • Re: Novice array size, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Novice array size, Kojak
    • Re: Novice array size, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Novice array size, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Novice array size, Kojak
  • Re: Novice array size, sathya
  • Re: Novice array size, Han from China
    • Re: Novice array size, Francogrex
      • Re: Novice array size, Kojak
      • Re: Novice array size, Han from China
  • Re: Novice array size, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Novice array size, Mark Wooding
  • Re: Novice array size, Stephen Sprunk
    • Re: Novice array size, Francogrex
  • Re: Novice array size, CBFalconer
    • Re: Novice array size, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Novice array size, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Novice array size, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Novice array size, Richard
• reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, mijoryx
  • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, CBFalconer
    • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, mijoryx
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, mijoryx
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, mijoryx
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, mijoryx
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, mijoryx
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, mijoryx
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, luser-ex-troll
    • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, Richard
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, Ike Naar
    • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, Bartc
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, Kojak
    • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, mijoryx
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, Richard Bos
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, luser-ex-troll
      • Re: reference-counted dynamic tag-union objects, Richard Bos
• A different kind of subtraction ?, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: A different kind of subtraction ?, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: A different kind of subtraction ?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: A different kind of subtraction ?, Fred
  • Re: A different kind of subtraction ?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: A different kind of subtraction ?, pete
  • Re: A different kind of subtraction ?, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: A different kind of subtraction ?, Ben Bacarisse
• Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Richard Bos
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Peter Nilsson
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Bruce Cook
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, CBFalconer
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Anthony Fremont
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Anthony Fremont
      • [OT] Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, rio
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Eric Sosman
    • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Richard Bos
    • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Richard
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, CBFalconer
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported..., Han from China
  • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Gordon Burditt
  • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Bartc
    • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Bartc
  • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Mark Wooding
    • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Kojak
    • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Richard Harter
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Richard Harter
    • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, jameskuyper
  • Re: Multiplication or Division of pointer is not supported by C language :( But, why ?, Anthony Fremont
• Scanf being missed?, Mike
  • Re: Scanf being missed?, Mark Wooding
  • Re: Scanf being missed?, Jens Thoms Toerring
  • Re: Scanf being missed?, Eric Sosman
  • Re: Scanf being missed?, nick_keighley_nospam
• Abercrombie Fitch Mens Shorts - Discount, zhanglin099
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Abercrombie Fitch Mens Shorts - Discount, janetanjn
• ++*p++, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: ++*p++, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Message not available
      • Re: ++*p++, Falcon Kirtaran
      • Re: ++*p++, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: ++*p++, Falcon Kirtaran
      • Re: ++*p++, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: ++*p++, Falcon Kirtaran
      • Re: ++*p++, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: ++*p++, Falcon Kirtaran
      • Re: ++*p++, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: ++*p++, Richard Bos
  • Re: ++*p++, Eric Sosman
    • Re: ++*p++, blargg
    • Re: ++*p++, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: ++*p++, Kojak
  • Re: ++*p++, pete
  • Re: ++*p++, Mark Wooding
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: ++*p++, pete
      • Re: ++*p++, Eric Sosman
      • Re: ++*p++, pete
      • Re: ++*p++, Eric Sosman
      • Re: ++*p++, pete
      • Re: ++*p++, Falcon Kirtaran
      • Re: ++*p++, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: ++*p++, Keith Thompson
      • Re: ++*p++, Falcon Kirtaran
• uninitialized memory read, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: uninitialized memory read, Mark Wooding
    • Re: uninitialized memory read, parag
    • Re: uninitialized memory read, Keith Thompson
      • Re: uninitialized memory read, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: uninitialized memory read, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: uninitialized memory read, Keith Thompson
      • Re: uninitialized memory read, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: uninitialized memory read, Richard Bos
  • Re: uninitialized memory read, Eric Sosman
• [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, maclab2
  • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, James Kuyper
  • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, blargg
      • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, pete
      • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, pete
      • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, pete
      • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, Phil Carmody
  • Re: dst=NULL,size=0, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: dst=NULL,size=0, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: [memcpy] dst=NULL,size=0, Han from China
• Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit, austinium
• Re:, Larry Gates
• Scanf function, pavunkumar
  • Re: Scanf function, Kojak
  • Re: Scanf function, Han from China
    • Re: Scanf function, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Scanf function, Han from China
  • Re: Scanf function, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: Scanf function, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Scanf function, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: Scanf function, Ike Naar
      • Re: Scanf function, nick_keighley_nospam
• Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, David Thompson
• Re: external variables, David Thompson
• Re: Strange printfs !!, Kojak
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Strange printfs !!, Kojak
• Information regarding C++ GUI Builders, stevenruiz
  • Re: Information regarding C++ GUI Builders, Kojak
  • Re: Information regarding C++ GUI Builders, Martin Ambuhl
  • Re: Information regarding C++ GUI Builders, Antoninus Twink
  • Re: Information regarding C++ GUI Builders, Sjouke Burry
• Interview Questions, kid joe
  • Re: Interview Questions, Kojak
  • Re: Interview Questions, Kenneth Brody
    • Re: Interview Questions, Mark Wooding
  • Re: Interview Questions, Bartc
  • Re: Interview Questions, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: Interview Questions, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Interview Questions, Han from China
      • Re: Interview Questions, Han from China
      • Re: Interview Questions, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Interview Questions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Interview Questions, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Interview Questions, Richard
      • Re: Interview Questions, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Interview Questions, Richard Bos
      • Re: Interview Questions, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Interview Questions, Rafael
      • Re: Interview Questions, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Interview Questions, Han from China
      • Re: Interview Questions, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Interview Questions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Interview Questions, Rafael
      • Re: Interview Questions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Interview Questions, Richard Harter
      • Re: Interview Questions, James Kuyper
      • Re: Interview Questions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Interview Questions, Han from China
      • Re: Interview Questions, CBFalconer
      • Re: Interview Questions, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Interview Questions, Han from China
      • Re: Interview Questions, Han from China
      • Re: Interview Questions, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Interview Questions, Han from China
      • Re: Interview Questions, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Interview Questions, Han from China
  • Re: Interview Questions, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Interview Questions, Kenny McCormack
    • Re: Interview Questions, kid joe
      • Re: Interview Questions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Interview Questions, Rafael
    • Re: Interview Questions, JosephKK
  • Re: Interview Questions, jameskuyper
  • Re: Interview Questions, Richard Bos
    • Re: Interview Questions, JosephKK
      • Re: Interview Questions, Richard Bos
      • Re: Interview Questions, JosephKK
  • Re: Interview Questions, G . S . Ohm
• Re: logging optimization, Neo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: logging optimization, David Thompson
• micro to declare and initialize a struct pointer does not work, why?, KOFKS
  • Re: micro to declare and initialize a struct pointer does not work, why?, Peter Nilsson
    • Re: micro to declare and initialize a struct pointer does not work, why?, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: micro to declare and initialize a struct pointer does not work, why?, pete
  • Re: micro to declare and initialize a struct pointer does not work, why?, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: micro to declare and initialize a struct pointer does not work, why?, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: micro to declare and initialize a struct pointer does not work, why?, KOFKS
  • Re: micro to declare and initialize a struct pointer does not work, why?, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: micro to declare and initialize a struct pointer does not work, why?, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: micro to declare and initialize a struct pointer does not work, why?, Golden California Girls
• Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Bruce Cook
• Reading Text Files, Mike
  • Re: Reading Text Files, Willem
    • Re: Reading Text Files, Rich Webb
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Richard
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Kaz Kylheku
      • OT: DOS/Windows slashes/backslashes (was Re: Reading Text Files), Kenneth Brody
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Keith Thompson
  • Re: Reading Text Files, Antoninus Twink
    • Re: Reading Text Files, JosephKK
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Joe Wright
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Joe Wright
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Richard Bos
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Reading Text Files, JosephKK
      • Re: Reading Text Files, CBFalconer
  • Re: Reading Text Files, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Reading Text Files, Mike
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Bartc
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Bartc
    • Re: Reading Text Files, Kenneth Brody
  • Re: Reading Text Files, CBFalconer
    • Re: Reading Text Files, Richard
  • Re: Reading Text Files, Barry Schwarz
    • Re: Reading Text Files, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Bartc
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Bartc
      • Re: Reading Text Files, CBFalconer
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Reading Text Files, JosephKK
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Bartc
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Mark L Pappin
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Reading Text Files, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Rafael
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Reading Text Files, Rafael
      • Re: Reading Text Files, JosephKK
• portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., Chris M. Thomasson
  • Re: portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., Mark Wooding
  • Re: portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., Eric Sosman
    • Re: portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., Chris M. Thomasson
      • Re: portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., Chris M. Thomasson
      • Re: portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., George Peter Staplin
      • Re: portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., Keith Thompson
      • Re: portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., Eric Sosman
      • Re: portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., Chris M. Thomasson
  • Re: portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., Chris M. Thomasson
    • Re: portable method of getting alignment of an arbitrary type..., Chris M. Thomasson
• Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Richard Bos
  • Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Mark Wooding
    • Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, CBFalconer
      • Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Richard
      • Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Mark Wooding
    • Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Richard Bos
• Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard Bos
• Christian Louboutin Shoes - Fashion, ppxingpu
• Even more proof of errors going uncorrected, Han from China
• Re: Segmentation fault, Roberto Divia
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Segmentation fault, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Segmentation fault, Kojak
    • Re: Segmentation fault, Ike Naar
      • Re: Segmentation fault, Kojak
    • Re: Segmentation fault, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Segmentation fault, Kojak
  • Re: Segmentation fault, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: Segmentation fault, Richard Bos
  • Re: Segmentation fault, Kenneth Brody
  • Segmentation fault, pavunkumar
    • Re: Segmentation fault, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Segmentation fault, jacob navia
• Leading padding in unions, sp12341234
  • Re: Leading padding in unions, sp12341234
  • Re: Leading padding in unions, CBFalconer
    • Re: Leading padding in unions, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, James Kuyper
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, pete
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, James Kuyper
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, pete
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, jameskuyper
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, pete
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, pete
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, jameskuyper
    • Re: Leading padding in unions, Han from China
  • Re: Leading padding in unions, Han from China
    • Re: Leading padding in unions, Richard Bos
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, Han from China
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, CBFalconer
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, CBFalconer
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, CBFalconer
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, Richard Bos
      • Re: Leading padding in unions, CBFalconer
    • Re: Leading padding in unions, sp12341234
• Re: Query for the group, Frank Adam
• Re: Interesting math problem, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Interesting math problem, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: Interesting math problem, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Interesting math problem, JosephKK
  • Re: Interesting math problem, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: Interesting math problem, Richard
  • Re: Interesting math problem, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: Interesting math problem, Kaz Kylheku
• Re: strange result, JosephKK
• Re: #include vs. -library, Mark Wooding
  • Re: #include vs. -library, Richard Heathfield
• Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Mark Wooding
  • Re: Remebering the order of precedence, David Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Remebering the order of precedence, David Thompson
• Re: Just a bit of silliness, JosephKK
  • Re: Just a bit of silliness, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Just a bit of silliness, Mark Wooding
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bruce Cook
  • Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bruce Cook
    • Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc
      • Re: Just a bit of silliness, Chris Dollin
      • Re: Just a bit of silliness, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Just a bit of silliness, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Just a bit of silliness, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Just a bit of silliness, CBFalconer
  • Re: Just a bit of silliness, David Thompson
• c program - command line prompt - need help, raeiko
  • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Spiros Bousbouras
  • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Curtis Dyer
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard
    • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Phil Carmody
    • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Han from China
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, jacob navia
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Bartc
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, jacob navia
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Bartc
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, jacob navia
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Mark Wooding
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Keith Thompson
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Han from China
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Han from China
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Han from China
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, CBFalconer
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Han from China
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, CBFalconer
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, CBFalconer
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Golden California Girls
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Phil Carmody
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Mark Wooding
      • [OT] Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: [OT] Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Mark Wooding
      • Re: [OT] Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard Tobin
      • Re: [OT] Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: [OT] Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: [OT] Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard Tobin
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Han from China
  • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Curtis Dyer
    • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, nick_keighley_nospam
  • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: c program - command line prompt - need help, Richard
• Fat pointers, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: Fat pointers, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Fat pointers, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Fat pointers, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Fat pointers, Nate Eldredge
  • Re: Fat pointers, Bartc
    • Re: Fat pointers, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Fat pointers, Bartc
      • Re: Fat pointers, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Fat pointers, grocery_stocker
      • Re: Fat pointers, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Fat pointers, grocery_stocker
      • Re: Fat pointers, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Fat pointers, grocery_stocker
      • Re: Fat pointers, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Fat pointers, Antoninus Twink
    • Re: Fat pointers, CBFalconer
      • Re: Fat pointers, Richard
  • Re: Fat pointers, nick_keighley_nospam
• %1.1f on 45.78 is 45.8 ??, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: %1.1f on 45.78 is 45.8 ??, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: %1.1f on 45.78 is 45.8 ??, Kojak
    • Re: %1.1f on 45.78 is 45.8 ??, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: %1.1f on 45.78 is 45.8 ??, Kojak
  • Re: %1.1f on 45.78 is 45.8 ??, Golden California Girls
  • Re: %1.1f on 45.78 is 45.8 ??, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: %1.1f on 45.78 is 45.8 ??, Keith Thompson
    • Re: %1.1f on 45.78 is 45.8 ??, karthikbalaguru
• Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Malcolm McLean
  • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Flash Gordon
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Malcolm McLean
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Mark Wooding
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Bos
  • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Han from China
    • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard
    • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, user923005
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, CBFalconer
      • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Bos
• Affliction Mens T-shirts - Discount, zhanglin099
• Re: GPS tracking software, Bubba
  • Re: GPS tracking software, Ben Bacarisse
    • Re: GPS tracking software, Bubba
      • Re: GPS tracking software, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: GPS tracking software, Bubba
      • Re: GPS tracking software, Ben Bacarisse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GPS tracking software, Bubba
    • Re: GPS tracking software, Bubba
      • Re: GPS tracking software, Bubba
    • Re: GPS tracking software, rio
• Re: header, nick_keighley_nospam
• Cross referencing objects: Am I invoking UB?, Suman
  • Re: Cross referencing objects: Am I invoking UB?, Ike Naar
    • Re: Cross referencing objects: Am I invoking UB?, dimwit
  • Re: Cross referencing objects: Am I invoking UB?, nick_keighley_nospam
• Newsreaders, Albert
  • Re: Newsreaders, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Newsreaders, Albert
      • Re: Newsreaders, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Newsreaders, Albert
      • Re: Newsreaders, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Newsreaders, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Newsreaders, Albert
      • Re: Newsreaders, James Kuyper
      • Re: Newsreaders, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Newsreaders, Sjouke Burry
      • Re: Newsreaders, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: Newsreaders, Rich Webb
  • Re: Newsreaders, Harold Aptroot
  • Re: Newsreaders, James Kuyper
    • Re: Newsreaders, blargg
      • Re: Newsreaders, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Newsreaders, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Newsreaders, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Newsreaders, Antoninus Twink
    • Re: Newsreaders, Albert
      • Re: Newsreaders, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Newsreaders, Richard Bos
      • Re: Newsreaders, blmblm
      • Re: Newsreaders, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Newsreaders, CBFalconer
      • Re: Newsreaders, Keith Thompson
    • Re: Newsreaders, Tristan Miller
      • Re: Newsreaders, Default User
      • Re: Newsreaders, Tony
      • Re: Newsreaders, Stephen Sprunk
      • Re: Newsreaders, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: [OT] Newsreaders, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Newsreaders, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: Newsreaders, Default User
      • Re: Newsreaders, Richard
      • Re: Newsreaders, JosephKK
      • Re: Newsreaders, Default User
      • Re: Newsreaders, JosephKK
      • Re: Newsreaders, Richard
      • Re: Newsreaders, Default User
      • Re: Newsreaders, Richard
      • Re: Newsreaders, JosephKK
      • Re: Newsreaders, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Newsreaders, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: Newsreaders, Doug Miller
      • Re: Newsreaders, Default User
      • Re: Newsreaders, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Newsreaders, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: Newsreaders, CBFalconer
      • Re: Newsreaders, Richard
      • Re: Newsreaders, JosephKK
      • Re: Newsreaders, Default User
      • Re: Newsreaders, Mark Wooding
  • Re: Newsreaders, jfbode1029
    • Re: Newsreaders, JosephKK
  • Re: Newsreaders, CBFalconer
    • Re: Newsreaders, Richard
      • Re: Newsreaders, JosephKK
      • Re: Newsreaders, CBFalconer
    • Re: Newsreaders, Albert
      • Re: Newsreaders, James Kuyper
      • Re: Newsreaders, CBFalconer
    • Re: Newsreaders, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Newsreaders, Richard
  • Re: Newsreaders, Hallvard B Furuseth
  • Re: Newsreaders, Richard Bos
    • Re: Newsreaders, Tony
  • Re: Newsreaders, JosephKK
• verdiene ich schnell geld,internet schnell viel geld,online roulette geld,internet geldverdienen,wie kommt man schnell an geld,, jazar859
• %a in printf, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: %a in printf, karthikbalaguru
    • Re: %a in printf, Kojak
  • Re: %a in printf, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: %a in printf, CBFalconer
      • Re: %a in printf, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: %a in printf, Richard
      • Re: %a in printf, CBFalconer
      • Re: %a in printf, Richard Heathfield
  • Re: %a in printf, Ben Bacarisse
• Re: Qsort-ing structures, Albert
  • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Nate Eldredge
    • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Albert
      • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Albert
      • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Albert
      • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Albert
      • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Albert
      • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Ike Naar
  • Re: Qsort-ing structures, Ike Naar
• Re: Conclusive proof concerning CBFalconer's thread annoyances, Larry Gates
• Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Larry Gates
• Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Golden California Girls
  • Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard Bos
    • Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard Bos
      • Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Martin Ambuhl
      • Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard Bos
• Re: usage of fwide function, Kenny McCormack
• %n !!, karthikbalaguru
  • Re: %n !!, Falcon Kirtaran
    • Re: %n !!, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: %n !!, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: %n !!, Falcon Kirtaran
      • Re: %n !!, JosephKK
      • Re: %n !!, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: %n !!, Ike Naar
      • Re: %n !!, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: %n !!, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: %n !!, Harald van Dijk
      • Re: %n !!, Falcon Kirtaran
      • Re: %n !!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: %n !!, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: %n !!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: %n !!, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: %n !!, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: %n !!, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: %n !!, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: %n !!, Mark Wooding
      • Re: %n !!, Nate Eldredge
      • Re: %n !!, Richard Tobin
      • Re: %n !!, Han from China
      • Re: %n !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: %n !!, Falcon Kirtaran
  • Re: %n !!, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: %n !!, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: %n !!, Falcon Kirtaran
      • Re: %n !!, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: %n !!, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: %n !!, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: %n !!, Falcon Kirtaran
      • Re: %n !!, karthikbalaguru
      • Re: %n !!, Kenneth Brody
      • Re: %n !!, Phil Carmody
      • Re: %n !!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: %n !!, Richard Tobin
      • Re: %n !!, Ike Naar
      • Re: %n !!, Phil Carmody
      • Re: %n !!, Keith Thompson
      • Re: %n !!, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: %n !!, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: %n !!, Falcon Kirtaran
  • Re: %n !!, Han from China
    • Re: %n !!, Richard Tobin
      • Re: %n !!, Harald van Dijk
• Re: Strange !!, CBFalconer
  • Re: Strange !!, Harald van Dijk
    • Re: Strange !!, Ben Bacarisse
      • Re: Strange !!, CBFalconer
      • Re: Strange !!, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Strange !!, Kenny McCormack
• Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??, James Kuyper
• Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), CLC stats
• Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., James Kuyper
    • Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Heathfield
  • Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack
  • Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack
• Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, CBFalconer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, Malcolm McLean
    • Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, Barry Schwarz
      • Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, Keith Thompson
      • Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, Rafael
      • Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, Gordon Burditt
      • Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, David Thompson
• Re: serial port in C, CBFalconer
  • Re: serial port in C, Han from China
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: serial port in C, Joachim Schmitz
  • Re: serial port in C, Han from China
  • Re: serial port in C, Richard
    • Re: serial port in C, the consiglieri
      • Re: serial port in C, CBFalconer
      • Re: serial port in C, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: serial port in C, Richard Bos
• Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Han from China
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, lawrence . jones
  • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, James Kuyper
    • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, David Thompson
    • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Lew Pitcher
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, CBFalconer
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, CBFalconer
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, CBFalconer
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, James Kuyper
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Han from China
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Walter Banks
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, nick_keighley_nospam
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, James Kuyper
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Antoninus Twink
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, CBFalconer
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Keith Thompson
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Golden California Girls
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Tea Pot
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Spiros Bousbouras
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, lawrence . jones
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Bartc
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Ben Bacarisse
  • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, James Kuyper
  • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, CBFalconer
    • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard
  • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, CBFalconer
  • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, CBFalconer
    • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, CBFalconer
  • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Chris M. Thomasson
  • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Old Wolf
  • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Bos
    • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield
    • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Bos
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, nick_keighley_nospam
    • Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Han from China