Re: Float comparison
- From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:47:40 GMT
In article <49f8747d.779348390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> cri@xxxxxxxx (Richard Harter) writes:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:21:36 GMT, "*** T. Winter"....
<***.Winter@xxxxxx> wrote:
Did you deliberately ignore what I wrote? I wrote: "the bounds of the
range are *not* eps(x * y), but eps(x + y)". Sheesh.
I'm sorry, but it seems to me that you are castigating cbf (in
itself quite the rage these days) quite unfairly. I know what he
is doing; he is deriving the extent of the bounds of the range of
x*y and showing that it is the same as the extent of the bounds
of x+y.
No, you misunderstand. Cbf is stating that a value represents a range.
So when you calculate (in float) z = x * y, z represents a range, bounded
by eps(z). I asked him how it was possible that a possible value for the
ranges represented by x and y could not be in the range represented by z.
He still has not given an answer.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, science park 123, 1098 xg amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Float comparison
- From: Gordon Burditt
- Re: Float comparison
- From: Richard Harter
- Re: Float comparison
- Prev by Date: c books
- Next by Date: Re: Float comparison
- Previous by thread: Re: Float comparison
- Next by thread: Re: Float comparison
- Index(es):