Re: Which book is better for a begainer to study C language?
- From: Han from China <autistic-pedantry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:32:06 -0600 (MDT)
Richard wrote:
I never quite got why "Turing Complete" keeps cropping up here.
That's easy. Anything containing the word "Turing" is to computer
science what "cogito ergo sum" is to epistemology, Godel's theorems
are to mathematical logic, the collective unconscious is to Jungian
psychology, and E=mc^2 is to physics: significant for specialists
but mostly just free smart points requiring no real understanding
for the average Usenet blabbermouth or wanker on the street.
(Disclaimer: I'm guilty of using "imperative" and a few others
to sound smart. I wouldn't be surprised if I've tossed out
"Turing Complete".)
Yours,
Han from China
--
"Only entropy comes easy." -- Anton Chekhov
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Pointer to function prototype in K&R C
- Next by Date: Re: looking for thoughts on the philosophy of optimizing compilers
- Previous by thread: Re: Which book is better for a begainer to study C language?
- Next by thread: Re: Which book is better for a begainer to study C language?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|